b. f. wrote:
On 3/1/11, Stephen Montgomery-Smithstep...@missouri.edu wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
b. f. wrote:
On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
...
As is clear from bsd.gcc.mk, in almost every case now in use,
USE_FORTRAN sets _USE_GCC, which
on 28/02/2011 00:41 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied
below) saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now.
The problem seems to be with libtool. If I run a command like:
On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied
below) saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now.
The issue seems to be that some reference to __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx is
included twice at some
b. f. wrote:
On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied below)
saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now.
The issue seems to be that some reference to __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx is included
twice at
.libs/api.o(.text.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0): In function
`__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx':
: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'
/usr/lib/crtbeginS.o(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0): first defined
here
*** Error code 1
Stop in /work/a/ports/science/vis5d+/work/vis5d+-1.2.1/src
,-soname -Wl,libvis5d.so.2 -o
.libs/libvis5d.so.2
.libs/api.o(.text.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0): In function
`__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx':
: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'
/usr/lib/crtbeginS.o(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0): first
defined here
*** Error code 1
.2
.libs/api.o(.text.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0): In function
`__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx':
: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'
/usr/lib/crtbeginS.o(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0): first defined
here
*** Error code 1
Stop in /work/a/ports/science/vis5d+/work/vis5d+-1.2.1
On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied
below) saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now.
The issue seems to be that some reference to __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx is
included twice at some point.
On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied
below) saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now.
The issue seems to be that some reference to __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx is
included twice at some
