Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.

2012-03-24 Thread Doug Barton
On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: Hey Doug, Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening ? Yes, see below. If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) I don't like the

Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.

2012-03-24 Thread Chris Rees
On 24 Mar 2012 21:47, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: Hey Doug, Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening ? Yes, see below. If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use

Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.

2012-03-24 Thread Jason Hellenthal
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: Hey Doug, Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening ? Yes, see below. If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to

Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.

2012-03-24 Thread Jason Hellenthal
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: Hey Doug, Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening ? Yes, see below. If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to

named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.

2012-03-23 Thread Jason Hellenthal
Hey Doug, Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening ? If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) from source it attempts to remove empty directories from /etc/named/*. When doing this it

Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.

2012-03-23 Thread Chris Rees
On 23 Mar 2012 15:41, Jason Hellenthal jhellent...@dataix.net wrote: Hey Doug, Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening ? If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) from source it

Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.

2012-03-23 Thread Jason Hellenthal
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 04:52:48PM +, Chris Rees wrote: On 23 Mar 2012 15:41, Jason Hellenthal jhellent...@dataix.net wrote: Hey Doug, Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening ? If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention