Hi Guido,
I saw you recently submitted net/unison240 but it depends on
lang/ocaml-nox11. This is a problem with using poudriere:
[00:00:58] >> Error: Duplicated origin for ocaml-nox11-4.01.0_4:
lang/ocaml-nox11 AND lang/ocaml. Rerun with -vv to see which ports are
depending on these.
Would
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
Here is the patch:
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile(revision 381259)
+++ Makefile
On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
>
> Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
>
I never noticed this since it never happened to me and nobody else
reported it.
Anyway now that you dr
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>> Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
>>
>> Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
>>
>
> I never noticed this since it never happen
On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>>> Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
>>> :o).
>>>
>>> Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison24
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>> On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
:o).
W
On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/un
On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>> On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
>
> Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
>
> Here is the patch:
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> --- Makefile
On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>> Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
>>
>> Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
>>
>> Here is the patch:
>>
>> Index: Makefile
>>
Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
>>> :o).
>>>
>>> Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
>>>
>>> Here is the patch:
>>>
>>>
On 03/21/15 13:26, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>> Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>>>
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
:o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the s
Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/21/15 13:26, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Guido Falsi wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>>
>>>
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
>>
On 03/21/15 14:50, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/21/15 13:26, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>
>> This leads me to think there is some misalignment of the X11 option in
>> your setup, that's why I asked for the full log of the failed build, I
>> need to check the environme
> On 21.03.2015, at 15:50, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/21/15 14:50, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>> Which means that if unsetting X11 on in the port and not globally ocaml
>> is built with X11 and unison without - which poudriere will fail on when
>> it tries to find the dependencies... which means
On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi
> wr
On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
>> On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>> On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>> On Mon, M
On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
>>> On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi
> wrote:
>>
On 03/21/15 17:55, Michael Grimm wrote:
>
>> On 21.03.2015, at 15:50, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/21/15 14:50, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
>
>>> Which means that if unsetting X11 on in the port and not globally ocaml
>>> is built with X11 and unison without - which poudriere will fail on when
>>
On 21.03.2015, at 19:10, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/21/15 17:55, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> I recently (after last upgrade of poudriere-devel, although I do not know if
>> that is the cause) ran into a comparable issue with unison without X11 :
>>
>> | MWN> cat /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/stab
Guido Falsi wrote:
>
> Exactly.
>
> There are four cases:
>
> one asks for both with or without X11, works fine, in both.
>
This is all ok.
> one asks for ocaml without X11 and unison with X11, this is wrong and
> cannot obviously work.
>
Absolutely. But this in theory should disable X11 i
On 03/21/15 21:53, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 21.03.2015, at 19:10, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/21/15 17:55, Michael Grimm wrote:
>
>>> I recently (after last upgrade of poudriere-devel, although I do not know
>>> if that is the cause) ran into a comparable issue with unison without X11 :
>>>
>>>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> > On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
> >> On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> >>> On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>
On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
>>> On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>> If you still think there is no difference, I will send you full build
>>> logs both with and with
Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
>>>
On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
If you still think there is no difference, I wil
On 03/26/15 12:59, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>>
>>> Poudriere logs are posted here:
>>>
>>> https://zeno.apeiron.net/unison/test1/
>>>
>>> With the conf
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:55:41AM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
> >> On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> >>> On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
> >>> If you still think there i
On 03/26/15 16:34, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:55:41AM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guid
Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/26/15 12:59, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Guido Falsi wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/26/15 03:21, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
Poudriere logs are posted here:
https:/
On 03/26/15 18:32, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/26/15 12:59, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>> Guido Falsi wrote:
>>>
>
>> I'll reply below with my
>> PERSONAL opinions about such requests.
>>
>> I reword it: the opinions below are personal and don't reflect the
>>
30 matches
Mail list logo
