Re: port science/paraview

2009-09-28 Thread Stas Timokhin
>I'd like to help but I've never done any serious >port work, just occasional patches. >What is your estimate of the amount of work, and of >skills required to bring this port up to date? I made update of this port, so you can test it. Diff can be found here: http://www.stasyan.com/devel/ports/par

Re: port science/paraview

2009-08-18 Thread wen heping
ParaView-3.6.1 require Qt4.3 or newer, there is qt-4.5.2 in FreeBSD ports tree. On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Philipp Ost wrote: > Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >> port science/paraview is far behind the current version. >> >> I do understand that nobody really takes

Re: port science/paraview

2009-08-18 Thread Philipp Ost
Anton Shterenlikht wrote: port science/paraview is far behind the current version. I do understand that nobody really takes care of it, so please do not see this as a request. I'm grateful that somebody has created this port at all! I'd like to help but I've never done any se

Re: port science/paraview

2009-08-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
Anton Shterenlikht wrote: port science/paraview is far behind the current version. I do understand that nobody really takes care of it, so please do not see this as a request. I'm grateful that somebody has created this port at all! I'd like to help but I've never done any se

Re: port science/paraview

2009-08-18 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Anton Shterenlikht wrote: port science/paraview is far behind the current version. I do understand that nobody really takes care of it, so please do not see this as a request. I'm grateful that somebody has created this port at all! I'd like to help but I've never done any se

port science/paraview

2009-08-18 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
port science/paraview is far behind the current version. I do understand that nobody really takes care of it, so please do not see this as a request. I'm grateful that somebody has created this port at all! I'd like to help but I've never done any serious port work, just occasiona