Re: ports/116050: [NEW PORT] devel/p5-Gearman-Server: Gearman server daemon

2007-09-25 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:27:14AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > On Sep 24, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > >On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:11:02AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > >>Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new > >>port created and assigned to me as the MAIN

Re: ports/116050: [NEW PORT] devel/p5-Gearman-Server: Gearman server daemon

2007-09-25 Thread Vivek Khera
On Sep 24, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:11:02AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER. It just seems wrong to do that. You can't just drop your kitt

Re: ports/116050: [NEW PORT] devel/p5-Gearman-Server: Gearman server daemon

2007-09-24 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:11:02AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new > port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER. It just seems > wrong to do that. You can't just drop your kitten on our doorstep and expect us to take care of

Re: ports/116050: [NEW PORT] devel/p5-Gearman-Server: Gearman server daemon

2007-09-24 Thread Vivek Khera
Hi... Sorry I've been out of the loop for a while. Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER. It just seems wrong to do that. Furthermore, since this port replaces devel/p5-gearmand, it should have either been repo