On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:45:03PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2011-Mar-29 13:51:21 +0200, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote:
Both graphics/netpbm and graphics/netpbm-devel are *WAY*
out of date (5 to 6 years).
I don't understand you. In my experience, the netpbm ports have
always
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2011-Mar-29 13:51:21 +0200, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote:
Both graphics/netpbm and graphics/netpbm-devel are *WAY*
out of date (5 to 6 years).
I don't understand you. In my experience, the netpbm ports have
always been updated fairly regularly.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:55:19PM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote:
Alex Kozlov schrieb:,
So why netpbm is 10.26.64 and graphics/netpbm-devel(??) is 10.35.80?
Because this is the last released tarball.
Later Version are only in Subversion.
2. - Subversion gives no reproduceable files:
Fetching
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote:
The current stable version is 10.47 (.27), and the current
advanced version (this is not the development version!) is
10.53 (.05).
I think that it makes sense to update the netpbm port to the
stable version, and the
On 3/30/2011 11:55 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
Alex Kozlov schrieb:,
So why netpbm is 10.26.64 and graphics/netpbm-devel(??) is 10.35.80?
Because this is the last released tarball.
Later Version are only in Subversion.
The way this has traditionally been handled is for the maintainer to
create
Hi,
Both graphics/netpbm and graphics/netpbm-devel are *WAY*
out of date (5 to 6 years). Many tools listed in the
documentation are not present in the FreeBSD port, and
many of the tools that are present are missing features.
What's making things is worse is the fact that the netpbm
ports don't
On 2011-Mar-29 13:51:21 +0200, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote:
Both graphics/netpbm and graphics/netpbm-devel are *WAY*
out of date (5 to 6 years).
I don't understand you. In my experience, the netpbm ports have
always been updated fairly regularly. The ports currently have:
