On 12/04/2012 11:09, Chris Rees wrote:
Chris, I did misread your email-- portmanager appears absolutely fine,
and is in no danger of removal :)
That's good to know thank you. Sorry, portupgrade to portmanager was a
bit of a sneaky corner.
Chris
On 12/04/2012 04:41, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 04/12/12 03:39, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 11 April 2012 21:55, Bryan Drewerybr...@shatow.net wrote:
Hi Phillip,
Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster
instead. What are the thoughts on this? Just the lack of a
On 12 April 2012 10:03, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 12/04/2012 10:57, Chris Rees wrote:
I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that portmanager
is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does what it does
extremely
well and without fuss. I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/12/2012 04:57 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
Unfortunately, many of us do not find that it 'just works'. There
is no-one to ask for support, so people resort to asking ports@ or
in IRC.
It is also unmaintained, and has many bugs against it:
I am
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:54 +0100
Chris Whitehouse articulated:
I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that
portmanager is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does
what it does extremely well and without fuss. I think the fact that
it still just works after
Am 12.04.2012 22:02, schrieb Jerry:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:54 +0100
Chris Whitehouse articulated:
I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that
portmanager is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does
what it does extremely well and without fuss. I think the
Hi Phillip,
Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster
instead. What are the thoughts on this? Just the lack of a maintainer?
I was considering writing/submitting a patch to support pkgng with
portupgrade.
1.
On 11 April 2012 21:55, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote:
Hi Phillip,
Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster
instead. What are the thoughts on this? Just the lack of a maintainer?
Open PRs that indicate long lasting bugs with no upstream maintainer.
If you
On 04/12/12 03:39, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 11 April 2012 21:55, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote:
Hi Phillip,
Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster
instead. What are the thoughts on this? Just the lack of a maintainer?
Open PRs that indicate long lasting
