Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version

2009-04-09 Thread Dima Panov
On Thursday 09 April 2009 23:22:17 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > OK. I've just committed a patch. > [...SKIP...] Sem, what about to restore old functionality with repacking dependent packages by portupgrade -rp ? With last versions of portupgrade it works only for bumped/rebuilded packages, but no

Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version

2009-04-09 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Robert Huff wrote: Sandra Kachelmann writes: I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please re-implement it? Try the "-F" switch. (I believe this used to be the default, but Something Happened(tm) within the last year to make it necessary to use it explicitly

Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version

2009-04-09 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
OK. I've just committed a patch. Sandra Kachelmann wrote: Hi I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please re-implement it? Sandra Sergey Matveychuk Date 3 Jul 2008 09:50:58 Subject Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current

Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version

2009-04-08 Thread Robert Huff
Sandra Kachelmann writes: > I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please > re-implement it? Try the "-F" switch. (I believe this used to be the default, but Something Happened(tm) within the last year to make it necessary to use it explicitly. There was a mess

Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version

2009-04-08 Thread Sandra Kachelmann
Hi I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please re-implement it? Sandra Sergey Matveychuk Date 3 Jul 2008 09:50:58 Subject Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version Message-ID 486ca0af.3020...@freebsd.org In reply to Sand

Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version

2008-07-03 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Robert Huff wrote: Sergey Matveychuk writes: > After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command > > $ portversion -vl'<' > > does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I > found the information useful. > > before: > gnutls-2.4.0

Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version

2008-07-03 Thread Robert Huff
Sergey Matveychuk writes: > > After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command > > > > $ portversion -vl'<' > > > > does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I > > found the information useful. > > > > before: > > gnutls-2.4.0< n

Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version

2008-07-03 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Sandra Kachelmann wrote: After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command $ portversion -vl'<' does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I found the information useful. before: gnutls-2.4.0< needs updating (port has 2.4.1) now: gnutls

portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version

2008-07-03 Thread Sandra Kachelmann
After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command $ portversion -vl'<' does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I found the information useful. before: gnutls-2.4.0< needs updating (port has 2.4.1) now: gnutls < need