Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

2017-12-04 Thread Henrik Hudson
On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, Henrik Hudson wrote: > On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, Henrik Hudson wrote: > > > On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, René Ladan wrote: > > > > > Op 1 dec. 2017 19:06 schreef "Henrik Hudson" : > > > > > > So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific > > >

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

2017-12-03 Thread emilia
> I had no idea that the handbook was still directing people straight to HEAD. > You're absolutely > right, that should be changed. Unfortunately, directing people to an SVN path > is difficult, because > the SVN URL changes every 3 months, and switching an SVN branch from one path > to another

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

2017-12-03 Thread Christoph Brinkhaus
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 09:47:20AM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: Dear Adam, first of all I thank you and all contributers. In my optinion things are running as smooth as possible. One must be extreme optimistic to expect such a change to happen without any issues. > > On 3 Dec, 2017, at 6:31,

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

2017-12-03 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 3 Dec, 2017, at 6:31, Eric Masson wrote: > > Is ports/head becoming the alter ego of src/head (possible breakages or > disruptive new features from time to time) ? Categorically, yes, though major breakages are rare. Situations like this, where a major new feature gets

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

2017-12-03 Thread Eric Masson
Adam Weinberger writes: Hi Adam, > Given that most people don't participate and test patches while they're > in review, you have to expect that some bugs will only surface when it > lands in HEAD. This is precisely why we have quarterly branches, and why > we recommend that

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

2017-12-02 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 2 Dec, 2017, at 5:55, Christian Ullrich wrote: > > * Henrik Hudson wrote: > >> So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific >> make.conf like this: > >> #Python >> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python=3.6 python2=2.7 python3=3.6 > > Same here, and this

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

2017-12-02 Thread Christian Ullrich
* Henrik Hudson wrote: So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific make.conf like this: #Python DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python=3.6 python2=2.7 python3=3.6 Same here, and this happens: # cat /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/py3-make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python=3.6 #

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

2017-12-01 Thread Henrik Hudson
On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, Henrik Hudson wrote: > On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, René Ladan wrote: > > > Op 1 dec. 2017 19:06 schreef "Henrik Hudson" : > > > > So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific > > make.conf like this: > > > > # > > #unset some options by

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

2017-12-01 Thread Henrik Hudson
On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, René Ladan wrote: > Op 1 dec. 2017 19:06 schreef "Henrik Hudson" : > > So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific > make.conf like this: > > # > #unset some options by default > OPTIONS_UNSET= ALSA APIDOCS BONJOUR CUPS DEBUG

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

2017-12-01 Thread René Ladan
Op 1 dec. 2017 19:06 schreef "Henrik Hudson" : So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific make.conf like this: # #unset some options by default OPTIONS_UNSET= ALSA APIDOCS BONJOUR CUPS DEBUG DOCBOOK DOCS EXAMPLES GNUTLS HTMLDOCS \ PULSEAUDIO

poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

2017-12-01 Thread Henrik Hudson
So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific make.conf like this: # #unset some options by default OPTIONS_UNSET= ALSA APIDOCS BONJOUR CUPS DEBUG DOCBOOK DOCS EXAMPLES GNUTLS HTMLDOCS \ PULSEAUDIO SOUND STATIC TESTS X11 XINERAMA XORG #fetch arguments - set