Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-13 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 12:03:54PM +0100, Stefan Ehmann wrote: I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental builds don't quite work as I expected. poudriere rebuilds all packages if any dependency has

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-13 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org writes: poudriere only knows that the dependency changed. In effect, to find out if the package of interest would be changed because of that, it has no other recourse than to build the package. Now, if you can come up with some heuristics whereby you can

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-12 Thread Karel Miklav
On 12.01.2015 18:55, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Well, no, there is not, and unless you figure out an algorithm to do it, and I'm saying algorithm in the mathematical sense, not heuristic, that is, one that is always right, feel free to submit a patch for it :-) Now, there's a good chance that it

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-12 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 12/01/2015 21:05, Karel Miklav wrote: On 12.01.2015 18:55, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Well, no, there is not, and unless you figure out an algorithm to do it, and I'm saying algorithm in the mathematical sense, not heuristic, that is, one that is always right, feel free to submit a patch for

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-12 Thread Stefan Ehmann
On 12.01.2015 18:45, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! The option -S (Don't recrusively rebuild packages affected by other packages requiring incremental rebuild) looked promising. But automatic packages are not always rebuilt and I've also encountered build problems. I'll try this option now and would

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-12 Thread Stefan Ehmann
On 12.01.2015 18:08, Mathieu Arnold wrote: +--On 12 janvier 2015 17:59:36 +0100 Stefan Ehmann shoes...@gmx.net wrote: | | But it would be nice to have a poudriere option to avoid rebuilds of | ports without version bumps. If something should go horribly wrong every | now and then, you can

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-12 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! The option -S (Don't recrusively rebuild packages affected by other packages requiring incremental rebuild) looked promising. But automatic packages are not always rebuilt and I've also encountered build problems. I'll try this option now and would appreciate if you could describe the

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-12 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 12 janvier 2015 18:45:06 +0100 Stefan Ehmann shoes...@gmx.net wrote: | On 12.01.2015 18:08, Mathieu Arnold wrote: | | | +--On 12 janvier 2015 17:59:36 +0100 Stefan Ehmann shoes...@gmx.net | wrote: | | | | But it would be nice to have a poudriere option to avoid rebuilds of | | ports

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-12 Thread Stefan Ehmann
On 12.01.2015 01:27, Mathieu Arnold wrote: +--On 4 janvier 2015 18:24:24 +0100 Stefan Ehmann shoes...@gmx.net wrote: | On 02.01.2015 12:03, Stefan Ehmann wrote: | I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to | manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-12 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 12 janvier 2015 17:59:36 +0100 Stefan Ehmann shoes...@gmx.net wrote: | | But it would be nice to have a poudriere option to avoid rebuilds of | ports without version bumps. If something should go horribly wrong every | now and then, you can still fall back to the default rebuild behavior.

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-12 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 1/12/2015 11:45 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! The option -S (Don't recrusively rebuild packages affected by other packages requiring incremental rebuild) looked promising. But automatic packages are not always rebuilt and I've also encountered build problems. I'll try this option now

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-11 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 4 janvier 2015 18:24:24 +0100 Stefan Ehmann shoes...@gmx.net wrote: | On 02.01.2015 12:03, Stefan Ehmann wrote: | I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to | manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental builds | don't quite work as I expected. |

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-11 Thread Karel Miklav
On 04.01.2015 18:24, Stefan Ehmann wrote: On 02.01.2015 12:03, Stefan Ehmann wrote: I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental builds don't quite work as I expected. poudriere rebuilds all packages if

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-05 Thread Mikhail Tsatsenko
02 янв. 2015 г. 14:04 пользователь Stefan Ehmann shoes...@gmx.net написал: I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental builds don't quite work as I expected. poudriere rebuilds all packages if any

Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-04 Thread Stefan Ehmann
On 02.01.2015 12:03, Stefan Ehmann wrote: I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental builds don't quite work as I expected. poudriere rebuilds all packages if any dependency has changed. If there are only

poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

2015-01-02 Thread Stefan Ehmann
I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental builds don't quite work as I expected. poudriere rebuilds all packages if any dependency has changed. If there are only some ports with new versions, possibly