On 28/12/2014 11:15, George Mitchell wrote:
I have both python 2.7.8 and python 3.3.5 installed on my machine. When
I build lang/python-doc-html, I end up with python-doc-html-2.7.8. Is
it possible to also get python-doc-html-3.3.5 generated and installed
somehow
I have both python 2.7.8 and python 3.3.5 installed on my machine. When
I build lang/python-doc-html, I end up with python-doc-html-2.7.8. Is
it possible to also get python-doc-html-3.3.5 generated and installed
somehow? -- George
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:26 PM, George Mitchell
wrote:
> On 10/25/14 18:16, Henry Hu wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 2:38 PM, George Mitchell
>> wrote:
>>
>> In the process of building and trying textproc/meld, I discovered that
>>> the lang/python27 configure process concludes, erroneousl
On 10/25/14 18:16, Henry Hu wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 2:38 PM, George Mitchell
wrote:
In the process of building and trying textproc/meld, I discovered that
the lang/python27 configure process concludes, erroneously, that FreeBSD
does not support working Posix semaphores. [...]
Can anyon
d these two lines:
>
> SEM_CONFIGURE_ENV= ac_cv_posix_semaphores_enabled=yes
> SEM_CONFIGURE_ENV_OFF= ac_cv_posix_semaphores_enabled=no
>
> I could not explain why these settings should have any effect on the
> configure and build process, but muttering my most superstitious
> imprecatio
ect on the
configure and build process, but muttering my most superstitious
imprecations under my breath I changed "...=no" to "...=yes" in the
second line and re-installed Python. Lo and behold, configure now
admitted that Posix semaphores worked, and I could run meld. (Why
me
Hi,
I'm working on porting www/py-bottle-cork (an authenticate module for
www/py-bootle).
This module support lot's of backend like:
- MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL using SQLAlchemy
- MongoDb
- SQLite
- Local JSON files for low-traffic web applications
For my needs I only use local JSON files.
Then
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:23:15PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote:
> This was mentioned earlier on the tinderbox list ---
Thanks for the pointer. Not sure why my google-fu failed me this time; is
tinderbox list being indexed correctly? (I'm not subscribed.)
> Comment out the TEST_DEPENDS in devel/py
y27-pylib-1.4.20.txz'
> make: Graph cycles through `py27-setuptools27-5.5.1.txz'
> `pkgconf-0.9.6_1.txz' is up to date.
> `pkg-1.3.6.txz' is up to date.
>
> On stable/8, make(1) falls into endless loop, repeating these lines all
> over again untill it dies via si
9.6_1.txz' is up to date.
`pkg-1.3.6.txz' is up to date.
On stable/8, make(1) falls into endless loop, repeating these lines all
over again untill it dies via sig11.
Can it be related to the recent Python framework overhaul? Any ideas how
to
have different package
> names.
>
> In practice, this means that you can install e.g. a python module for two
> different Python versions at the same time with pkg now (a last fix for it was
> provided on August, the 8th, for the ports, so make sure to update your ports
> tree befo
tree), but have different package
> names.
>
> In practice, this means that you can install e.g. a python module for two
> different Python versions at the same time with pkg now (a last fix for it was
> provided on August, the 8th, for the ports, so make sure to update your ports
>
e.g. a python module for two
different Python versions at the same time with pkg now (a last fix for it was
provided on August, the 8th, for the ports, so make sure to update your ports
tree beforehand).
To install a python module for different Python version, you just have to
provide PYTHON_VERSION
On, Tue Aug 05, 2014, Yuri wrote:
> I am rebuilding the port hierarchy with the top port having
> USE_PYTHON=yes. This package runs python-config.
> But only python2 and python27 were actually built, and therefore only
> python2-config is available and my port breaks.
> Default m
I am rebuilding the port hierarchy with the top port having
USE_PYTHON=yes. This package runs python-config.
But only python2 and python27 were actually built, and therefore only
python2-config is available and my port breaks.
Default meta-port python-2.7, that would have contained python-config
On 22/07/2014 18:43, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> But I can still bump PORTREVISION on py-salt as for this specific port
> the missing egginfo is harmful? (for most other ports it's harmless)
that would be great, thanks.
Nick
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:09 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>>>>On 2014-07-22 17:34, Nick Hilliard wrote:> sysutils/py-salt has been broken
>>>>for the last couple of weeks. The
>>>>> resulting package didn't include the python egg info directory and as a
&
>>>On 2014-07-22 17:34, Nick Hilliard wrote:> sysutils/py-salt has been broken
>>>for the last couple of weeks. The
>>>> resulting package didn't include the python egg info directory and as a
>>>> result, py-salt crashed on startup.
sysutils/py-salt has been broken for the last couple of weeks. The
resulting package didn't include the python egg info directory and as a
result, py-salt crashed on startup. There a PR in bugzilla for this:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191986
>From what I can te
On 07/07/2014 09:13, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 7/07/2014 8:41 AM, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
>> Hi Kubilay!
>>
>> On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/07/2014 7:52 AM, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
>>> Submit an issue with patch, I'll add maintainer_approval flag cc'ing
>>> maintainer if you can
> From the top of my head, at least www/py-flup is broken and one in the
> deps of virtualenvwrapper.
>
> --
> Melvyn
If you're interested, feel free to create an Phabricator account (you
can login via github & twitter) so we can do the update together with
revi
Hi Kubilay!
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 7/07/2014 7:52 AM, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
Submit an issue with patch, I'll add maintainer_approval flag cc'ing
maintainer if you cant, just let me know the issue ID :)
Thought I submitted more already, but they're still in the queue and
d
On 7/07/2014 7:52 AM, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2014, Robert Simmons wrote:
>
>> Beautiful Soup 3.x is Python 2.x only. From the website:
>
> I know that.
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191387#c3
>
> The port doesn't:
> http:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014, Robert Simmons wrote:
Beautiful Soup 3.x is Python 2.x only. From the website:
I know that.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191387#c3
The port doesn't:
http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/py-beautifulsoup32/Makefile
That was the point of the
Beautiful Soup 3.x is Python 2.x only. From the website:
"Beautiful Soup 3 works only under Python 2.x."
http://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm coming accross a few ports that are in the t
Hello,
I'm coming accross a few ports that are in the tree as we speak, that do
not actually install correctly with Python 3.x but aren't marked as 2.7
only.
There seems to be 2 cases:
1. incompatibility in setup.py or related, thus failing in configure
2. incompatibility in the c
g_resources.py", line 742,
> in require
> needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements))
> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 639,
> in resolve
> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
> pkg_resources.Distribut
/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 639, in
resolve
raise DistributionNotFound(req)
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: grizzled-python>=1.0
Methodology or wrapper program or clue as to what to reinstall ???
___
freebsd-po
the commit number to add to the package name
> to distinguish different builds? If PORTVERSION must be static, then
> should I add some package suffix that can be based on a dynamic
> value/variable?
Unfortunately master/head/tip are moving targets and the commit hash
changes over
to the package name
to distinguish different builds? If PORTVERSION must be static, then
should I add some package suffix that can be based on a dynamic
value/variable?
>> 2. Is the way to check python modules dependency correct?
>>
>> PORTNAME= cura
>> PORTVERSION=
On 1/07/2014 11:56 PM, CeDeROM wrote:
> Hello there :-)
>
> I am writing a Makefile to a Python based port that gets the source
> code from GitHub. Two questions:
>
> 1. How to change PORTVERSION / GH_COMMIT based on user choice /
> option? One value for PORTVERSION seems
Hello there :-)
I am writing a Makefile to a Python based port that gets the source
code from GitHub. Two questions:
1. How to change PORTVERSION / GH_COMMIT based on user choice /
option? One value for PORTVERSION seems fine but to change it to
master does not work..
2. Is the way to check
nstall
>> graphics/opencv-core?
>
> This would only apply to py-opencv, so that is the only port that
> would have to be rebuilt. Sorry if that was unclear. I meant that
> numpy should be imported at the python prompt before the opencv
> module.
> $python
>
t;
> Does this mean, we have to rebuild and reinstall math/py-numpy before
> installing graphics/opencv? Do we have to also reinstall
> graphics/opencv-core?
This would only apply to py-opencv, so that is the only port that
would have to be rebuilt. Sorry if that was unclear. I meant that
nump
ts Makefile.
>>
>> /z
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:34 AM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>>>
>>> Zenny wrote this message on Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:24 +0200:
>>>> Hi:
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to
te this message on Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:24 +0200:
>> > Hi:
>> >
>> > I am trying to run opencv2 and installed it using the pkg binaries
>> > (opencv
>> > and py27-opencv).
>> >
>> > However when I try to import opencv2 module, it out
On 11/06/2014 3:54 AM, Robert Simmons wrote:
> Is there an ETA for updating the python27 port to 2.7.7?
> ___
> freebsd-pyt...@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
> To unsubscribe, send any m
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Robert Simmons wrote:
> Is there an ETA for updating the python27 port to 2.7.7?
I just made a patch for updating python27:
https://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/patch/python-2.7.7.diff
If the tests are fine and there is no exp-run needed (I suppose no?),
I p
Is there an ETA for updating the python27 port to 2.7.7?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Is there an ETA for updating the python27 port to 2.7.7?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Marcus von Appen wrote:
> On behalf of the FreeBSD python team, I'd like to announce the availability of
> concurrent, conflict-free python package support in the ports tree.
>
> Why?
>
> FreeBSD supports different python versions and flavours to be installed at
>
On behalf of the FreeBSD python team, I'd like to announce the availability of
concurrent, conflict-free python package support in the ports tree.
Why?
FreeBSD supports different python versions and flavours to be installed at
the same time, such as e.g. Python 2.7 and Python 3.3.
On, Wed May 07, 2014, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:57:41AM -0400, pathiaki2 wrote:
> > On 05/07/2014 08:46, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > >pathiaki2 writes:
> > >
> > >>/usr/ports/databases/pgtune
> > >>
> > >>It d
On 05/07/2014 09:23, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:57:41AM -0400, pathiaki2 wrote:
On 05/07/2014 08:46, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
pathiaki2 writes:
/usr/ports/databases/pgtune
It doesn't check to see if python is installed. Python is required to
run this.
That'
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:57:41AM -0400, pathiaki2 wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 08:46, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> >pathiaki2 writes:
> >
> >>/usr/ports/databases/pgtune
> >>
> >>It doesn't check to see if python is installed. Python is required to
On 05/07/2014 08:46, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
pathiaki2 writes:
/usr/ports/databases/pgtune
It doesn't check to see if python is installed. Python is required to
run this.
That's strange. pgtune defines USE_PYTHON, which adds python to both the
build and run dependencies. It *sh
pathiaki2 writes:
> /usr/ports/databases/pgtune
>
> It doesn't check to see if python is installed. Python is required to
> run this.
That's strange. pgtune defines USE_PYTHON, which adds python to both the
build and run dependencies. It *
Hi,
/usr/ports/databases/pgtune
It doesn't check to see if python is installed. Python is required to
run this.
Thanks!
P.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe,
On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:59:40 +0400
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> O. Hartmann wrote on 19.04.2014 18:35:
> >
> > I try to port PyOpenCL and one dependency is PyOpenGL and Mako. For Mako
> > (textproc/py-mako) the check for dependecy seems simple as I can check
> >
> > BUILD_DEPENDS+=
Hi,
O. Hartmann wrote on 19.04.2014 18:35:
I try to port PyOpenCL and one dependency is PyOpenGL and Mako. For Mako
(textproc/py-mako) the check for dependecy seems simple as I can check
BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${PYTHONBASE}/bin/mako-render:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/py-mako
But how can I check for PyOpenG
I try to port PyOpenCL and one dependency is PyOpenGL and Mako. For Mako
(textproc/py-mako) the check for dependecy seems simple as I can check
BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${PYTHONBASE}/bin/mako-render:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/py-mako
But how can I check for PyOpenGL? As far as I came, it must be something like
On 6-4-2014 4:22, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 5/04/2014 9:12 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>
>>
>> Op 5 apr. 2014 om 05:48 heeft Shane Ambler het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On 04/04/2014 22:42, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>&
n wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've tried to upgrade my python 2.7 which did not work.
>>>> Then I deinstalled all python stuff and tried to install python3 (aka 3.3)
>>>
>>> You can install both versions of python (2.7 & 3.3)
On 5/04/2014 9:12 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>
>
> Op 5 apr. 2014 om 05:48 heeft Shane Ambler het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 04/04/2014 22:42, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've tried to upgrade my python 2.7 which did
Op 5 apr. 2014 om 05:48 heeft Shane Ambler het volgende
geschreven:
> On 04/04/2014 22:42, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've tried to upgrade my python 2.7 which did not work.
>> Then I deinstalled all python stuff and tried to install python3 (ak
On 04/04/2014 22:42, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to upgrade my python 2.7 which did not work.
> Then I deinstalled all python stuff and tried to install python3 (aka 3.3)
You can install both versions of python (2.7 & 3.3) at the same time,
but currently
Hi,
I've tried to upgrade my python 2.7 which did not work.
Then I deinstalled all python stuff and tried to install python3 (aka 3.3)
The system everytime refuses to install because of missing a database:
pkg-static:
lstat(/home2/usr/ports/lang/python33/work/stage/usr/local/lib/python3.
Hi,
When I run `make` in the graphics/mapserver dir and examine the work
directory I notice that there is indeed a mapscript/python subfolder
including a setup.py. Unfortunately running
# python setup.py sdist
to create an egg it fails, notifying me that:
# python setup.py sdist
Traceback (most
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 7:04 AM Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 22/03/2014 9:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
> > I see that Python 3.4.0 has been released
> > <http://blog.python.org/2014/03/python-340-released.html>. Are there
> > any plans to incorporate it into the port
On 22/03/2014 9:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
> I see that Python 3.4.0 has been released
> <http://blog.python.org/2014/03/python-340-released.html>. Are there any
> plans to incorporate it into the ports system?
>
Hi Jerry :)
I'm a major part of the way through finishing a lang
I see that Python 3.4.0 has been released
<http://blog.python.org/2014/03/python-340-released.html>. Are there any
plans to incorporate it into the ports system?
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
Hi,
I can't seem to build mapserver-6.4.0_1 with Python mapscript. I noticed
the following lines at the end of the mapscript build:
===> Registering installation for mapserver-6.4.0_1
pkg-static: lstat(/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mapscript.py):
No such file or directory
pk
On 19/12/2013 4:26 AM, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> On behalf of the FreeBSD python team, I'd like to announce that the
> lang/python port has been removed as an implicit port dependency for
> ports using USE_PYTHON, USE_PYTHON_BUILD and USE_PYTHON_RUN in revision
> 336850.
>
On 18 дек. 2013 г., at 21:26, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> On behalf of the FreeBSD python team, I'd like to announce that the
> lang/python port has been removed as an implicit port dependency for
> ports using USE_PYTHON, USE_PYTHON_BUILD and USE_PYTHON_RUN in revision
> 336
On behalf of the FreeBSD python team, I'd like to announce that the
lang/python port has been removed as an implicit port dependency for
ports using USE_PYTHON, USE_PYTHON_BUILD and USE_PYTHON_RUN in revision
336850.
Why?
The removal is necessary to bring us a step closer to buildin
Synopsis: New port: devel/py-pycparser Complete C99 parser written in pure
Python
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: wg
State-Changed-When: Sun Dec 15 15:41:32 UTC 2013
State-Changed-Why:
What? this port already exists! Thanks
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi
84778
>Category: ports
>Responsible:freebsd-ports-bugs
>Synopsis: New port: devel/py-pycparser Complete C99 parser written in
>pure Python
>Arrival-Date: Sun Dec 15 15:40:00 UTC 2013
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.o
that i need to
--enable-python-binding. (absurd, as that is the whole point of this port) i
trace this back
to the master Makefile in net-p2p/libtorrent-rasterbar. there I find:
.if defined(SLAVE_PORT) && ${SLAVE_PORT:L} == "yes" && defined(USE_PYTHON)
CONFIGURE_ARG
On 06/10/2013 21:13, Marcus von Appen wrote:
On, Sat Oct 05, 2013, Daamn M wrote:
For example: I have installed python 2.7 and then port py-someport. Then I
installed python 3.3 and set PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION to point python 3.3. If
I try to install port py-someport again I wll get an error
2013/10/6 Marcus von Appen
> On, Sat Oct 05, 2013, Daamn M wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry if I'm asking a question that have been asked many times but I
> > couldn't find an answer using google.
> >
> > I need to install few version of Python
On, Sat Oct 05, 2013, Daamn M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if I'm asking a question that have been asked many times but I
> couldn't find an answer using google.
>
> I need to install few version of Python (at least 2.6, 2.7 and 3.3). I
> really appreciate that FreeBS
orts and rubygems. It will work for the majority
> packages that do not install files outside of the site-packages and
> include directories for python. Ports installing e.g. binaries
> might need some additional care, since there is a small regression for
> directories within BSD.loca
outside of the site-packages and
include directories for python. Ports installing e.g. binaries
might need some additional care, since there is a small regression for
directories within BSD.local.dist.
The knob supports the traditional distutils as well as easy_install on
all currently supported
python3.2/site-path
> >>>> but now I lost the 2.7 version.
> >>>>
> >>>> the same happens if I try to install the 2.7 version, it will complain
> >>>> that the 3,2 version is installed.
> >
ost the 2.7 version.
>>>>
>>>> the same happens if I try to install the 2.7 version, it will complain
>>>> that the 3,2 version is installed.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, the comments in ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk are very confusing and
>>>> s
to install the 2.7 version, it will complain
> >> that the 3,2 version is installed.
> >>
> >> BTW, the comments in ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk are very confusing and
> >> some are wrong:
> >> # PYTHON_VERSION- Version of the python binary i
Am 2013-09-10 08:11, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
David Wahlund wrote on 09.09.2013 22:46:
This throws a "this port is deprecated"-warning. EoL for python26 is 1
october 2013.
Just a heads up.
Regards
David
It builds fine python 2.7:
https://redports.org/~rm/20130909204800-7
David Wahlund wrote on 09.09.2013 22:46:
This throws a "this port is deprecated"-warning. EoL for python26 is 1
october 2013.
Just a heads up.
Regards
David
It builds fine python 2.7:
https://redports.org/~rm/20130909204800-7664-143662/mapserver-6.2.1_3.log
Would you try
This throws a "this port is deprecated"-warning. EoL for python26 is 1
october 2013.
Just a heads up.
Regards
David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free
--- devel/py-bcdoc/Makefile (revision 326423)
+++ devel/py-bcdoc/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -1,22 +1,18 @@
-# Created by: Alexey V. Degtyarev
+# Created by: Nikolai Lifanov
# $FreeBSD$
-PORTNAME= botocore
-PORTVERSION= 0.5.3
+PORTNAME= bcdoc
+PORTVERSION= 0.9.0
CAT
Once more, would someone please commit this PR?
Currently this port is broken due to update of mail/py-spf to 2.0.9,
and this PR need to be committed to fix it.
Best regards.
---
Yasuhiro KIMURA
From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
Subject: Re: ports/177797: [PATCH] mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python: update
On, Sun Aug 18, 2013, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I just tried to compile a 9-stable with ports r324867 using sysbuild.sh.
>
> Along the way the devel/git port fails, for the lack of python:
>
> gmake[1]: /usr/local/bin/python: Command not found
> test "
## Poul-Henning Kamp (p...@phk.freebsd.dk):
> I just tried to compile a 9-stable with ports r324867 using sysbuild.sh.
>
> Along the way the devel/git port fails, for the lack of python:
Looks like lang/python is now required to get /usr/local/bin/python, in
addition to UPDATING
I just tried to compile a 9-stable with ports r324867 using sysbuild.sh.
Along the way the devel/git port fails, for the lack of python:
gmake[1]: /usr/local/bin/python: Command not found
test "$(cat GIT-PYTHON-VERSION 2>/dev/null)" = "" ||
Dear committers.
Would someone please commit this PR? Maintainer already approve it.
Best Regards.
---
Yasuhiro KIMURA
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> >> >>>> /usr/local/lib/python3.2/site-path
> >> >>>> but now I lost the 2.7 version.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> the same happens if I try to install the 2.7 version, it will complain
> >> >&
>
> > BTW, the comments in ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk are very confusing and
> > some are wrong:
> > # PYTHON_VERSION- Version of the python binary in your ${PATH}, in
> > the
> > # format "python2.0". Set this i
> directory:
>>>> /usr/local/lib/python3.2/site-path
>>>> but now I lost the 2.7 version.
>>>>
>>>> the same happens if I try to install the 2.7 version, it will complain
>>>> that the 3,2 version is installed.
>>>
tall the 3.2 version in the correct
> >>>> directory:
> >>>> /usr/local/lib/python3.2/site-path
> >>>> but now I lost the 2.7 version.
> >>>>
> >>>> the same happens if I try to install the 2.7 version, it will complain
> &
very confusing and
some are wrong:
# PYTHON_VERSION- Version of the python binary in your ${PATH},
in the
# format "python2.0". Set this in
your
makefile in case you
# want to build extensions with
an
ol
pens if I try to install the 2.7 version, it will complain
>>> that the 3,2 version is installed.
>>>
>>> BTW, the comments in ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk are very confusing and
>>> some are wrong:
>>> # PYTHON_VERSION- Version o
:
# PYTHON_VERSION- Version of the python binary in your
${PATH}, in the
# format "python2.0". Set
this in your
makefile in case you
# want to build extensions with an
ol
are wrong:
# PYTHON_VERSION- Version of the python binary in your ${PATH}, in the
# format "python2.0". Set this in your
makefile in case you
# want to build extensions with an
ol
very confusing and
> some are wrong:
> # PYTHON_VERSION- Version of the python binary in your ${PATH}, in the
> # format "python2.0". Set this in your
> makefile in case you
> #
/site-path
but now I lost the 2.7 version.
the same happens if I try to install the 2.7 version, it will complain
that the 3,2 version is installed.
BTW, the comments in ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk are very confusing and
some are wrong:
# PYTHON_VERSION- Version of the python binary in your
I have same problem. Just rebuild boost-python:
portupgrade -frR boost-python-libs-1.52.0
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/net-p2p-libtorrent-rasterbar-16-python-does-not-build-tp5791587p5826910.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at
Hello,
I've been working on getting Python wrappers for libpkg (pkgng) for the
past few weeks and I think that I've reached the point to actually announce
it :)
Anyway, straight to the point.
You can find on the below listed links information about the libpkg Python
wrappers along wi
# have default permissions.
#
# This archive contains:
#
# python-gnupg
# python-gnupg/Makefile
# python-gnupg/distinfo
# python-gnupg/pkg-descr
# python-gnupg/pkg-plist
#
echo c - python-gnupg
mkdir -p python-gnupg > /dev/null 2>&1
echo x - python-gnupg/Make
Howdy,
python-gnupg is a python wrapper for the gnupg library. It is a separate
project from py-gnupg, but offers similar functionality. You can read
more about it here:
https://code.google.com/p/python-gnupg/
http://pythonhosted.org/python-gnupg/
Here's some example code just for the fun
Am 21.05.2013 13:31, schrieb Michael Gmelin:
> I had the same problem yesterday in a clean jail:
>
> cd /usr/ports/devel/python33
> make install
>
> It stopped with lots of error messages, I was too tired to care
> and just ran
>
> make install
>
> once again and then it worked.
> (no update o
401 - 500 of 859 matches
Mail list logo
