Re: rcorder doesn't apply to ports startup scripts in 6.0?

2007-01-15 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:17:30PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote: > Scot Hetzel wrote: > >>So all of the ports which are being updated to use rcorder are now > >>breaking on all of the existing 6.0 systems... > >> > >It shouldn't break existing systems, as the scripts are still run in > >alphabetical order

Re: rcorder doesn't apply to ports startup scripts in 6.0?

2007-01-13 Thread Doug Barton
Jo Rhett wrote: > Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> Move the affected scripts to /etc/rc.d. > > Ugh. It's non portable and hard to document, compared to "apply this > patch to all 6.0 systems" which I can do via cfengine. Yeah, I wouldn't go that route either. You should be able to generate the right pat

Re: rcorder doesn't apply to ports startup scripts in 6.0?

2007-01-13 Thread Jo Rhett
Gabor Kovesdan wrote: Move the affected scripts to /etc/rc.d. Ugh. It's non portable and hard to document, compared to "apply this patch to all 6.0 systems" which I can do via cfengine. -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation ___ freebsd

Re: rcorder doesn't apply to ports startup scripts in 6.0?

2007-01-13 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Jo Rhett schrieb: Scot Hetzel wrote: So all of the ports which are being updated to use rcorder are now breaking on all of the existing 6.0 systems... It shouldn't break existing systems, as the scripts are still run in alphabetical order on the 6.0 systems before revision 1.336.2.1 of /etc/rc

Re: rcorder doesn't apply to ports startup scripts in 6.0?

2007-01-13 Thread Jo Rhett
Doug Barton wrote: It might be simpler just to update to 6.2-RELEASE in the long run. It's planned, about 3 months from now. Until then... ;-) -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists

Re: rcorder doesn't apply to ports startup scripts in 6.0?

2007-01-12 Thread Doug Barton
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Jo Rhett wrote: Scot Hetzel wrote: So all of the ports which are being updated to use rcorder are now breaking on all of the existing 6.0 systems... It shouldn't break existing systems, as the scripts are still run in alphabetical order on the 6.0 systems before revision

Re: rcorder doesn't apply to ports startup scripts in 6.0?

2007-01-12 Thread Jo Rhett
Scot Hetzel wrote: So all of the ports which are being updated to use rcorder are now breaking on all of the existing 6.0 systems... It shouldn't break existing systems, as the scripts are still run in alphabetical order on the 6.0 systems before revision 1.336.2.1 of /etc/rc. Which scripts ar

Re: rcorder doesn't apply to ports startup scripts in 6.0?

2007-01-12 Thread Doug Barton
Jo Rhett wrote: > I'd just like to confirm that rcorder wasn't implemented until 6.1, right? Scot's answer was correct here in terms of timing. If you're looking for a big round number, 6.1-RELEASE is good enough. > So all of the ports which are being updated to use rcorder are now > breaking on

Re: rcorder doesn't apply to ports startup scripts in 6.0?

2007-01-12 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 1/12/07, Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd just like to confirm that rcorder wasn't implemented until 6.1, right? rcorder was implemented for the base system scripts in 5.0-RELEASE, support for the ports rc.d scripts was implemented in 6.0-STABLE (/etc/rc 1.336.2.1 on 2005/12/21 07:11:

rcorder doesn't apply to ports startup scripts in 6.0?

2007-01-11 Thread Jo Rhett
I'd just like to confirm that rcorder wasn't implemented until 6.1, right? So all of the ports which are being updated to use rcorder are now breaking on all of the existing 6.0 systems... -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation ___