Re: really to pkg people

2016-11-28 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 01:21:44AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > It's most disconcerting when a quarterly collection of packages disappears > and one has nowhere to get new packages that match all the ones out in the > field. I think this is more a question for clusteradm@ than for the ports

Re: really to pkg people

2016-11-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 2016/11/28 17:21, Julian Elischer wrote: > It's most disconcerting when a quarterly collection of packages > disappears and one has nowhere to get new packages that match all the > ones out in the field. Since 10.3 is the latest 10 release and the > release_3 collection is gettign soemwhat

Re: really to pkg people

2016-11-28 Thread Steven Hartland
If the machines where installed using pkg you can always grab the installs out of the cache (/var/cache/pkg/) on the relevant machines to debug issues. On 28/11/2016 17:21, Julian Elischer wrote: Is it at all possible for the ports/pkg people to QUIT DELETING STUFF! It's most disconcerting

really to pkg people

2016-11-28 Thread Julian Elischer
Is it at all possible for the ports/pkg people to QUIT DELETING STUFF! It's most disconcerting when a quarterly collection of packages disappears and one has nowhere to get new packages that match all the ones out in the field. Since 10.3 is the latest 10 release and the release_3 collection