> Use "freebsd-update fetch install" to update staying in the currently
> running RELEASE branch. So you just get security updates and errata.
ty!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsub
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 03:29:23PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>
> Royce Williams wrote:
> >
> > Colin, adding you to this thread with proposed patch (two options) for
> > freebsd-update, below.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > >> Honest question, have you been b
Royce Williams wrote:
>
> Colin, adding you to this thread with proposed patch (two options) for
> freebsd-update, below.
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> Honest question, have you been building things from source under
> >> debian's ports or are you using their ve
Colin, adding you to this thread with proposed patch (two options) for
freebsd-update, below.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Honest question, have you been building things from source under
>> debian's ports or are you using their version of "pkg"?
>
> the latter
>
> and i
On 3/22/2014 15:29, Esa Karkkainen wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:49:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
>> > and i have two 9 systems where i try to use freebsd-update. also a
>> > time-consuming rabbit hole leading nowhere pleasant. e.g.
>> >
>> > # freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE-p3
> L
Am 23.03.2014 01:18, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
> PACKAGESITE support in pkg.conf has been dropped entirely in 1.3 which
> is in alpha at the moment. I need to double check, but that should mean
> those error messages will go away too.
To be blunt, anyone who wants to use FreeBSD for production doe
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:40:36 +0900
Randy Bush wrote:
> > strange. Whenever I come in touch with Linux, I have the feeling
> > that the people better would have kept Windows on their machine.
>
> the first time i logged on to a linux system, i said `ls`, it came out
> in color, and i walked
On Mar 22, 2014, at 5:40 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
strange. Whenever I come in touch with Linux, I have the feeling that
the people better would have kept Windows on their machine.
+1, liked, upvoted, favorited, pinned, retweeted
the first time i logged on to a linux system, i said `ls`, it cam
> On Mar 22, 2014, at 2:44 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>
>> On 03/22/14 14:00, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
>>> On 03/22/2014 01:57 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
>>> wrote:
On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
>>
At least testing bran
> strange. Whenever I come in touch with Linux, I have the feeling that
> the people better would have kept Windows on their machine.
the first time i logged on to a linux system, i said `ls`, it came out
in color, and i walked away.
i have been a freebsd lover for a couple of decades, and 4.3 be
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 03:19:21 +0900
Randy Bush wrote:
> > What about using pkg(1) and what version of FreeBSD are you on?
>
> what about standing on my left foot and chewing gum? you're down in
> the kinky world where the customer has to spend serious time and
> energy to get around brokenn
On 22/03/2014 23:15, Royce Williams wrote:
> To this day, I still have an 8.3 jail that complains:
>
> pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a
> repository configuration file
>
> ... but I don't actually have a pkg.conf in that jail, and 'grep -r
> PACKAGESITE /' yields no
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
[snip]
> there will always be a few bugs. otoh, with freebsd ports, there may be
> a few working paths, but they are damned hard to find. and there is
> very viable competition. many long time freebsd users are leaving, yes
> sadly, but leav
On 03/22/14 14:00, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
On 03/22/2014 01:57 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
At least testing branches would be appreciated.
Something like ivoras@ suggested two years ago?
http:
On 03/22/2014 01:57 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
> wrote:
>> On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
>> At least testing branches would be appreciated.
>
> Something like ivoras@ suggested two years ago?
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/f
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:49:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> and i have two 9 systems where i try to use freebsd-update. also a
> time-consuming rabbit hole leading nowhere pleasant. e.g.
>
> # freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE-p3
Lose the "-p3", because freebsd-update will get you to the
> Ok then, well then you should be using pkg if you want to do a fair
> apples to apples comparison.
as i said, pkg also fails every day in weird and wonderful ways.
> That is quite annoying! I don't happen to use FreeBSD update, but
> honestly posting a log of this as a fresh message to the l
Forgot to reply to list.
Typos and terseness brought to you by the LG G2 running SlimKat.
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Freddie Cash"
Date: Mar 22, 2014 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: reason 23 why we've moved to linux
To: "Randy Bush"
Cc:
On Mar 22, 2014 11:4
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
> On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
>>
>> from another team member, also a long time freebsd user of decades
>>
>> firefox build bombs because something has hardwired gcc47, which is
>> not installed, so firefox's ./configure bo
On 3/22/14 11:49 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
Honest question, have you been building things from source under
debian's ports or are you using their version of "pkg"?
the latter
Ok then, well then you should be using pkg if you want to do a fair
apples to apples comparison.
Otherwise you're compar
On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
from another team member, also a long time freebsd user of decades
firefox build bombs because something has hardwired gcc47, which is
not installed, so firefox's ./configure bombs testing hello world.
Attempting to figure out what has hardwir
> Honest question, have you been building things from source under
> debian's ports or are you using their version of "pkg"?
the latter
and i have two 9 systems where i try to use freebsd-update. also a
time-consuming rabbit hole leading nowhere pleasant. e.g.
# freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-
On 3/22/14 11:38 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
I'm nursing a touch of a foul mood too. (The missus and I were out at
a birthday party last night a little later than we should have.)
sympathies. don't drink, though freebsd ports causes me to reconsider
It might loosen you up!
I'm going to gym to s
> I'm nursing a touch of a foul mood too. (The missus and I were out at
> a birthday party last night a little later than we should have.)
sympathies. don't drink, though freebsd ports causes me to reconsider
> I'm going to gym to shake out the bad attitudes, what are you doing?
going back to
On 3/22/14 11:19 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
What about using pkg(1) and what version of FreeBSD are you on?
what about standing on my left foot and chewing gum? you're down in the
kinky world where the customer has to spend serious time and energy to
get around brokenness in your product. this is a
> What about using pkg(1) and what version of FreeBSD are you on?
what about standing on my left foot and chewing gum? you're down in the
kinky world where the customer has to spend serious time and energy to
get around brokenness in your product. this is a well-known recipe for
losing customers
On 3/22/14 11:12 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
from another team member, also a long time freebsd user of decades
firefox build bombs because something has hardwired gcc47, which is
not installed, so firefox's ./configure bombs testing hello world.
Attempting to figure out what has hardw
from another team member, also a long time freebsd user of decades
firefox build bombs because something has hardwired gcc47, which is
not installed, so firefox's ./configure bombs testing hello world.
Attempting to figure out what has hardwired gcc47 quickly leads down
an entire
On 3/18/14, 9:56 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
Ugh, that's a mess, I haven't seen that personally, but I just tend to
pull from git, although that takes a long time.
Using git lets me keep local changes easily.
The other option that works is just using portsnap. I think "portsnap
auto" or "portsnap a
> Ugh, that's a mess, I haven't seen that personally, but I just tend to
> pull from git, although that takes a long time.
>
> Using git lets me keep local changes easily.
>
> The other option that works is just using portsnap. I think "portsnap
> auto" or "portsnap alfred" should work for get
Ugh, that's a mess, I haven't seen that personally, but I just tend to
pull from git, although that takes a long time.
Using git lets me keep local changes easily.
The other option that works is just using portsnap. I think "portsnap
auto" or "portsnap alfred" should work for getting your the
/usr/ports# svn up
Updating '.':
Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn0.us-east.freebsd.org:443':
- The certificate has an unknown error.
Certificate information:
- Hostname: svnmir.ysv.FreeBSD.org
- Valid: from Jul 29 22:01:21 2013 GMT until Dec 13 22:01:21 2040 GMT
- Issuer: cl
32 matches
Mail list logo
