Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-04 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/04/2012 06:00, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > On 02.01.2012 23:32, Doug Barton wrote: >> Is there such a thing as a redports mailing list? > > I neither have the infrastructure nor the time to > setup and maintain my own list so I created one on > Google Groups: > > redpo...@googlegroups.com >

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-04 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 04.01.2012 19:21, Greg Larkin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/4/12 3:07 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: On 03.01.2012 22:32, Greg Larkin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to a

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-04 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/4/12 3:07 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > On 03.01.2012 22:32, Greg Larkin wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: >>> Hi Porters! >>> >>> I am happy to announce that redports

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-04 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 02.01.2012 23:32, Doug Barton wrote: Is there such a thing as a redports mailing list? I neither have the infrastructure nor the time to setup and maintain my own list so I created one on Google Groups: redpo...@googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/group/redports IRC was easy: #redpo

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-04 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 03.01.2012 22:32, Greg Larkin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! In case you never heard of it

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-03 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > Hi Porters! > > I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally > reached the point where I think It's safe to be used > by everybody! In case you never heard of it before > redports is the result

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-03 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 02.01.2012 23:32, Doug Barton wrote: Is there such a thing as a redports mailing list? No, currently not. There is no mail infrastructure for redports yet. If people want such a list or an IRC channel I could certainly do it but it's not high priority for me right now. -- Bernhard Froehlich

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-02 Thread Doug Barton
Is there such a thing as a redports mailing list? -- You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ __

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-02 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 12:44:58 +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > Hi Porters! > > I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally > reached the point where I think It's safe to be used > by everybody! In case you never heard of it before > redports is the result of an idea born at EuroBSDCon

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-02 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 01.01.2012 21:03, Vitaly Magerya wrote: Hi again. I've got this issue: an update to one port depends on an update to another one, and I'd like to test both before submitting. So the question is this: if I've got both ports in the repository, when rebuilding the dependent port, will redports us

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-01 Thread Vitaly Magerya
Hi again. I've got this issue: an update to one port depends on an update to another one, and I'd like to test both before submitting. So the question is this: if I've got both ports in the repository, when rebuilding the dependent port, will redports use the dependency from official ports tree, or

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2012-01-01 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Sa., 31. Dez. 2011 23:26:14 CET, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Bernhard, is there a time limit on build execution, or some other kind > of hang prevention? Yes, there is some limit in tinderbox but I think it's somewhere around 24 hours. > My port (lang/stklos) has a known problem with hanging on

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-31 Thread Vitaly Magerya
Bernhard, is there a time limit on build execution, or some other kind of hang prevention? My port (lang/stklos) has a known problem with hanging on 9.x, and it's already been building for 90 minutes (normally it takes one)... So, if you'll read this message before it is finished, please just kill

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-30 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Do., 29. Dez. 2011 17:55:06 CET, Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Frank Laszlo > wrote: > > On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > > > > > > Hi Porters! > > > > > > I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally > > > reached the point where

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-30 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Do., 29. Dez. 2011 19:13:46 CET, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > I am trying this out.  Looking at the instructions on > https://redports.org/wiki/UserGuide: > > > svn co https://svn.redports.org/ > mkdir www > cp -pr /usr/ports/www/phpvirtualbox www/ > svn add www > svn commit -m "phpv

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-29 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
I am trying this out. Looking at the instructions on https://redports.org/wiki/UserGuide: svn co https://svn.redports.org/ mkdir www cp -pr /usr/ports/www/phpvirtualbox www/ svn add www svn commit -m "phpvirtualbox added" shouldn't there be a second line "cd " or something like that?

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-29 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Do., 29. Dez. 2011 15:26:12 CET, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > > Hi Porters! > > > > I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally > > reached the point where I think It's safe to be used > > by everybody! > > First of all, this is pretty great. > > Next, questi

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-29 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Frank Laszlo wrote: > > I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally > > reached the point where I think It's safe to be used > > by everybody! > > FYI, I'm getting a 502 bad gateway error when loading the page. In nginx case, it's usually a sympthom of broken/stalle

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-29 Thread Marin Atanasov Nikolov
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Frank Laszlo wrote: > On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: >> >> Hi Porters! >> >> I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally >> reached the point where I think It's safe to be used >> by everybody! > > > FYI, I'm getting a 502 bad gateway error

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-29 Thread Iqbal Aroussi
FYI: me too. 502 Bad Gateway -- nginx/1.0.11 * -- * *Iqbal Aroussi* *+212 665 025 032* *iq...@aroussi.name* On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 16:08, Frank Laszlo wrote: > On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > >> Hi Porters! >> >> I am happy to announce that red

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-29 Thread Frank Laszlo
On 12/29/11 6:44 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! FYI, I'm getting a 502 bad gateway error when loading the page. -- Frank Laszlo _

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-29 Thread Vitaly Magerya
Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > Hi Porters! > > I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally > reached the point where I think It's safe to be used > by everybody! First of all, this is pretty great. Next, questions, comments & feature requests. 1. It would be good to see what is currently

Re: redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-29 Thread wen heping
Account created. Am I the first user of your redports.org ? wen 2011/12/29 Bernhard Froehlich > Hi Porters! > > I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally > reached the point where I think It's safe to be used > by everybody! In case you never heard of it before > redports is the resu

redports.org - The public FreeBSD ports development infrastructure

2011-12-29 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
Hi Porters! I am happy to announce that redports.org has finally reached the point where I think It's safe to be used by everybody! In case you never heard of it before redports is the result of an idea born at EuroBSDCon 2011 in Karlsruhe to give Port Maintainers and Port Committers a public ser