llinois.edu GSI patch,
which not only include the Wilkinson's GSSAPI Patch but also the HPN patch,
among others. Unfortunately this patch also conflicts with some of our own
FreeBSD patches in the port. What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI
patch from security/openssh-portable and fo
Hi, I see this port has no maintainer now and is now out of date. I
have attempted myself to update the port but have hit a number of
problems.
1 - some of the contrib patches dont exist for the new version of the
app. I assume support would need to be dropped t least emporarily on
an update.
2 -
Hello Cy,
On 3/14/2012 08:57, Cy Schubert wrote:
[snip]
> What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI
> patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI
> server key exchange, create a new port (through a repocopy of course) which
> includes the illinois.edu GS
In message <4f60ef46.2040...@acsalaska.net>, Mel Flynn writes:
> Hello Cy,
>
> On 3/14/2012 08:57, Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI
> > patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI
> &
On 03/14/2012 09:01 PM, Cy Schubert wrote:
In message<4f60ef46.2040...@acsalaska.net>, Mel Flynn writes:
Hello Cy,
On 3/14/2012 08:57, Cy Schubert wrote:
[snip]
What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI
patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI
serv
Cy,
If the option of splitting openssh into two ports means that one of those
ports is closer to the base system's openssh, and the base system's openssh
requires the FreeBSD patch-set, for base, then this is a commendable
suggestion. Otherwise, I would vote for one kit, subject of course to
Grze
I (maintainer of security/openssh-portable) need one or two days to
review GSI patch and other patches which are available for openssh-5.9.
But repocopy security/openssh-portable to security/openssh-portable58
and upgrade security/openssh-portable to 5.9 sound reasonable for me.
Beginning from
Hi,
Thanks in advance for taking a look at this.
I need help understanding how to test a port patch and submit it to the
port maintainer. Port in question is security/openssh-portable, for which
KERB_GSSAPI is broken. Upstream has a patch, but Poudriere is failing in
the fetch phase after my
The pending update to 6.5 is on my github:
https://github.com/bdrewery/openssh/
I will commit in the next few days. Please test and comment back in private.
The KERB_GSSAPI is beyond hope. It lacks an upstream and I have no way
to test. It needs refactoring as the key handling/API has changed a b
Please see ports/150493 for someone who seems to be looking at it.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Request.
Attached is a patch against security/openssh-portable Makefile to remove
FreeBSD version and openssl version from its version reply string.
This changes it from its default reply to: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.2p1
I would rather leave a prober
After became a new maintainer of security/openssh-portable,
I updated it to 5.8p2 version.
My paches fixes several problems repoted to this port:
- ports/144597: Kerberos knob work again
- ports/150493: Port updated to (almost) recent version
- ports/160389: Port build fine on FreeBSD 9.x
- ports
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:46 AM Rick Miller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks in advance for taking a look at this.
>
> I need help understanding how to test a port patch and submit it to the
> port maintainer. Port in question is security/openssh-portable, for which
> KERB_GSSAPI is
Hello,
> > Thanks in advance for taking a look at this.
Can you please upload it to bugs.freebsd.org and post the PR number
here ? The re-formatted patch is very difficult to read.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:55 AM Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > Thanks in advance for taking a look at this.
>
> Can you please upload it to bugs.freebsd.org and post the PR number
> here ? The re-formatted patch is very difficult to read.
Indeed, it is.
Please disregard. It was determine
Hi all...
Not sure if this is the correct way of asking for a bit of help, but i
have been trying to upgrade the ports in one of my servers, and when i
am trying to upgrade the port security/openssh-portable to the following
version:
openssh-portable-6.2.p2_3,1
It will fail to compile
On 2/2/2014 8:57 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> The pending update to 6.5 is on my github:
> https://github.com/bdrewery/openssh/
>
> I will commit in the next few days. Please test and comment back in private.
>
> The KERB_GSSAPI is beyond hope. It lacks an upstream and I have no way
> to test. It n
On 2/4/2014 7:41 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 2/2/2014 8:57 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> The pending update to 6.5 is on my github:
>> https://github.com/bdrewery/openssh/
>>
>> I will commit in the next few days. Please test and comment back in private.
>>
>> The KERB_GSSAPI is beyond hope. It lac
Hi,
On 5/30/2012 6:38 PM, Michael wrote:
> Hi, I found problem on FreeBSd 9.0 RELEASE p2
>
> dev# cd /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable
> dev# make deinstall
> ===> Deinstalling for security/openssh-portable
> ===> openssh-portable not installed, skipping
> dev#
On 5/30/12 9:25 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
cd /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable
fetchhttp://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports%2F168306&getpatch=1
patch< patch-openssh-hpn-mirror.txt
actually, the & in the command line mucks things up.
this should work:
cd /usr/por
is up publicly yet but will soon.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 09:44:13PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> On 5/30/12 9:25 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > cd /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable
> > fetchhttp://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports%2F168306&getpatch=1
03:38:32 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: security/openssh-portable HPN 404
You guys may want to try these out...
This updates to openssh-portable-5.9p1_2,1
See the attached config file for the options I tested with. If you want
something else and it does not work feel free to email me directly an
ats for
> prs owned by scheidell.
>
> --
> Michael Scheidell, CTO
> >|SECNAP Network Security
>
>
> -Original message-
> From: Jason Hellenthal
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org"
> Sent: Thu, May 31, 2012 03:38:3
Probably you want VersionAddendum option in sshd_config?
Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 08:14 -0500 jhell:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Request.
>
> Attached is a patch against security/openssh-portable Makefile to remove
> FreeBSD version a
but I did not miss that option.
Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 08:14 -0500 jhell:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Request.
Attached is a patch against security/openssh-portable Makefile to remove
FreeBSD version and openssl version from its version reply string.
This changes it from its
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:40, jhell@ wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:29, dindin@ wrote:
Probably you want VersionAddendum option in sshd_config?
No.
To my understanding and my last tests VersionAddendum and is only a Addendum
or did not work which spurred me to patch up the Makefile in the fir
> >Probably you want VersionAddendum option in sshd_config?
> >
>
> No.
>
> To my understanding and my last tests VersionAddendum and is only a
> Addendum or did not work which spurred me to patch up the Makefile in the
> first place.
I put VersionAddendum into sshd_config (with nothing trail
> centel# service openssh restart
> /usr/local/etc/ssh/sshd_config: line 13: Bad configuration option:
> VersionAdendum
> /usr/local/etc/ssh/sshd_config: terminating, 1 bad configuration options
>
> ? So like I was saying "It does not work that way".
Looks like you have a typo. It should be "Ver
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:45:36 -0500
jhell wrote:
J> centel# service openssh restart
J> /usr/local/etc/ssh/sshd_config: line 13: Bad configuration option:
J> VersionAdendum
^ "VersionAddendum"
J> /usr/local/etc/ssh/sshd_config: terminating, 1 bad configuration
J> options
J>
J>
Il 01/13/10 14:45, jhell ha scritto:
centel# service openssh restart
/usr/local/etc/ssh/sshd_config: line 13: Bad configuration option:
VersionAdendum
/usr/local/etc/ssh/sshd_config: terminating, 1 bad configuration options
? So like I was saying "It does not work that way".
You spelt it inco
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:45, jhell@ wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:40, jhell@ wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:29, dindin@ wrote:
Probably you want VersionAddendum option in sshd_config?
No.
To my understanding and my last tests VersionAddendum and is only a
Addendum or did not work which spu
Denny Lin wrote:
Probably you want VersionAddendum option in sshd_config?
No.
To my understanding and my last tests VersionAddendum and is only a
Addendum or did not work which spurred me to patch up the Makefile in the
first place.
I put VersionAddendum into sshd_config (with nothing tra
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:03, 000.fbsd@ wrote:
Denny Lin wrote:
Probably you want VersionAddendum option in sshd_config?
No.
To my understanding and my last tests VersionAddendum and is only a
Addendum or did not work which spurred me to patch up the Makefile in the
first place.
I put Vers
version with your 5.8. Of course i
will do this in my test system first and i will report any problems.
Thanks once more for this work.
Fred
---
Frederico Costa
fredpo...@mufley.com
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:24:05 +0200, Grzegorz Blach wrote:
After became a new maintainer of security/openssh
version with your 5.8. Of course i
will do this in my test system first and i will report any problems.
Thanks once more for this work.
Fred
---
Frederico Costa
fredpo...@mufley.com
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:24:05 +0200, Grzegorz Blach wrote:
After became a new maintainer of security/openssh
Mainly features introduced by external patches should be tested.
They work for me, but maybe someone will find some regressions.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any ma
New snapshot is ready to testing:
https://github.com/downloads/Roorback/mgk_ports/openssh-portable-5.8p2-t2.shar
In this version WITH_LPK knob is fixed.
Thanks to Gleb Smirnoff.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 06:38:10PM +0200, Grzegorz Blach wrote:
G> New snapshot is ready to testing:
G>
https://github.com/downloads/Roorback/mgk_ports/openssh-portable-5.8p2-t2.shar
G> In this version WITH_LPK knob is fixed.
G> Thanks to Gleb Smirnoff.
btw, one more issue with the port is that c
On 9/2/2013 3:14 AM, Frederico Costa wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> Not sure if this is the correct way of asking for a bit of help, but i
> have been trying to upgrade the ports in one of my servers, and when i
> am trying to upgrade the port security/openssh-portable to the foll
bit of help, but
i
have been trying to upgrade the ports in one of my servers, and when
i
am trying to upgrade the port security/openssh-portable to the
following
version:
openssh-portable-6.2.p2_3,1
It will fail to compile, with the standard options set for the config
with the following
Howdy!
Could someone update the SCTP patch for ports/security/openssh-portable?
Fixed version attached (very basic changes: account for "oIdentityAgent"
config option and "-J" flag that appeared in openssh-7.3).
I use SCTP all the time (makes a _huge_ differenc
bsd-openpty.c:128: error: for each function it appears in.)
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/work/openssh-5.2p1/openbsd-compat.
*** Error code 1
I'm surprised there is nothing appearing on this in the lists,
or have I missed it all?
anton
--
Anton Shterenlik
John E Hein wrote:
John E Hein wrote at 16:31 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006:
> Now that ports/Mk does the right thing for DESTDIR (thanks to Gábor),
> here's a patch that supports DESTDIR properly for
> security/openssh-portable:
>
[snip]
> @@ -171,29 +171,33 @@ post-ext
Gábor Kövesdán wrote at 01:29 +0200 on Aug 10, 2006:
> John E Hein wrote:
> > John E Hein wrote at 16:31 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006:
> > > Now that ports/Mk does the right thing for DESTDIR (thanks to Gábor),
> > > here's a patch that supports DESTDIR prope
at supports DESTDIR properly for
> > > security/openssh-portable:
> > >
> > [snip]
> > > @@ -171,29 +171,33 @@ post-extract:
> > > post-patch:
> > >@${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|-ldes|-lcrypto|g' ${WRKSRC}/configure
> >
John E Hein wrote at 17:43 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006:
> Well, the part that makes it annoying to duplicate in all ports is not
> the two separate words (CHROOT DESTDIR), but that you have to test
> defined(DESTDIR) && !empty(DESTDIR) before you can figure out whether
> to use ${CHROOT} ${DESTDIR} o
Gábor Kövesdán wrote at 01:47 +0200 on Aug 10, 2006:
> Ah, you mean defining CHROOTDESTDIR only when DESTDIR is set and leave
> it empty when not? It sounds reasonable then. I'll work this out after
> some hours of sleeping. :)
Yep... that's it.
__
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:59:18PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
> John E Hein wrote at 17:43 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006:
> > Well, the part that makes it annoying to duplicate in all ports is not
> > the two separate words (CHROOT DESTDIR), but that you have to test
> > defined(DESTDIR) && !empty(DESTDI
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:59:18PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
John E Hein wrote at 17:43 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006:
> Well, the part that makes it annoying to duplicate in all ports is not
> the two separate words (CHROOT DESTDIR), but that you have to test
> defined(DESTDIR
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:25:38PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:59:18PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
> >
> >>John E Hein wrote at 17:43 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006:
> >> > Well, the part that makes it annoying to duplicate in all ports is not
> >> > the
John E Hein wrote at 11:55 -0600 on Aug 10, 2006:
> Brooks Davis wrote at 09:05 -0500 on Aug 10, 2006:
> > I think we should ideally introduce a feature to allow ports to
> > automatically run pkg-install and stuff the code in bsd.port.mk so
> > ports don't have to know about DESTDIR in this
Brooks Davis wrote at 09:05 -0500 on Aug 10, 2006:
> My inclination would be something like:
>
> PKG_INSTALL_TEMP=`mktemp ${DESTDIR}/tmp/pkg_install` && \
> (${CAT} ${PKG_INSTALL} > ${PKG_INSTALL_TEMP}; \
> ${SH} ${PKG_INSTALL_TEMP}; \
> ${RM} ${PKG_INSTALL_
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:25:38PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:59:18PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
John E Hein wrote at 17:43 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006:
Well, the part that makes it annoying to duplicate i
Hi,
security/openssh-portable was recently updated to 8.0p1 and breaks GSSAPI.
I'd like to test the Debian GSSAPI patch for 8.0p1[1] submitting the result
to the openssh-portable maintainer. Poudriere already sets the appropriate
options for KERB_GSSAPI here so the intent is to leverage Poud
Hi!
> Could someone update the SCTP patch for ports/security/openssh-portable?
Now a major motion picture at
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215632
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to
> Hi!
>
> > Could someone update the SCTP patch for
> > ports/security/openssh-portable?
>
> Now a major motion picture at
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215632
Great! I will be cheering for all the main characters.
--
[SorAlx
On 12/27/16 9:39 PM, sor...@cydem.org wrote:
>
> Howdy!
>
> Could someone update the SCTP patch for ports/security/openssh-portable?
> Fixed version attached (very basic changes: account for "oIdentityAgent"
> config option and "-J" flag that appeared
On 1/13/17 1:31 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 12/27/16 9:39 PM, sor...@cydem.org wrote:
>>
>> Howdy!
>>
>> Could someone update the SCTP patch for ports/security/openssh-portable?
>> Fixed version attached (very basic changes: account for "oIdentityAgent
> > Could someone update the SCTP patch for
> > ports/security/openssh-portable? Fixed version attached (very basic
> > changes: account for "oIdentityAgent" config option and "-J" flag
> > that appeared in openssh-7.3).
> The proper place to
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:43:50 -0800
wrote:
>
> My point is that it might be a good idea to commit SCTP support
> into base system's openssh. Then we(I) won't need the port at all.
> The protocol first appeared in FreeBSD, yet there is not a single
> program that uses it. This can change.
I use i
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 5:34 PM Rick Miller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> security/openssh-portable was recently updated to 8.0p1 and breaks GSSAPI.
> I'd like to test the Debian GSSAPI patch for 8.0p1[1] submitting the result
> to the openssh-portable maintainer. Poudriere already
Hey people,
I was looking over old unresolved PR's. I came across this one:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144597
When I sent a message to the submitter of the PR, the email bounced back
suggesting that the submitter no longer uses that email address.
I don't think it woul
As stated in the subject
if [ -f /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key ]; then
echo "You already have a Elliptic Curve DSA host key" \
"in /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key"
echo "Skipping protocol version 2 Elliptic Curve DSA Key Generation"
else
/usr/
On 07/15/2011 06:23 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:39:01PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Hey people,
I was looking over old unresolved PR's. I came across this one:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144597
When I sent a message to the submitt
On 07/15/2011 06:28 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/15/2011 06:23 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:39:01PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Hey people,
I was looking over old unresolved PR's. I came across this one:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.
On 16 Jul 2011 00:23, "Jason Hellenthal" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:39:01PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> > Hey people,
> >
> > I was looking over old unresolved PR's. I came across this one:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144597
> >
> > When I
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:17 PM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
>
> As stated in the subject
>
> if [ -f /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key ]; then
> echo "You already have a Elliptic Curve DSA host key" \
> "in /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key"
> echo "Skipping protocol
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:17 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
>
> As stated in the subject
>
> if [ -f /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key ]; then
> echo "You already have a Elliptic Curve DSA host key" \
> "in /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key"
> echo "Skipping protocol
"Enable kerberos (autodetection)"
KERB_GSSAPI=off: "Enable Kerberos/GSSAPI patch (req: GSSAPI)"
LIBEDIT=on: "Enable readline support to sftp(1)"
LPK=off: "Enable LDAP Public Key (LPK) patch"
OPENSSH_CHROOT=on: "Enable CHROOT support"
OVE
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 01:46:20PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:17 PM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
> >
> > As stated in the subject
> >
> > if [ -f /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key ]; then
> > echo "You already have a Elliptic Curve DSA host key" \
> >
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:24 PM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 01:46:20PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:17 PM, J. Hellenthal
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > As stated in the subject
>> >
>> > if [ -f /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key ]; then
>> > echo
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 02:38:54PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:24 PM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 01:46:20PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:17 PM, J. Hellenthal
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > As stated in the subject
> >
72 matches
Mail list logo
