On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 01:02:09PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:53:21AM +1100, Stephen Hocking wrote:
In my efforts to make the xrdp port more robust under FreeBSD, I have
discovered that sigwait (kind of an analogue to select(2), but for
signals rather than I/O)
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:53:21AM +1100, Stephen Hocking wrote:
Hi all,
In my efforts to make the xrdp port more robust under FreeBSD, I have
discovered that sigwait (kind of an analogue to select(2), but for
signals rather than I/O) re-enables ignored signals in its list under
Linux, but
Stephen Hocking schrieb:
Hi all,
In my efforts to make the xrdp port more robust under FreeBSD, I have
discovered that sigwait (kind of an analogue to select(2), but for
signals rather than I/O) re-enables ignored signals in its list under
Linux, but not FreeBSD.
If the application relies
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote:
Stephen Hocking schrieb:
Hi all,
In my efforts to make the xrdp port more robust under FreeBSD, I have
discovered that sigwait (kind of an analogue to select(2), but for
signals rather than I/O) re-enables ignored
Hi all,
In my efforts to make the xrdp port more robust under FreeBSD, I have
discovered that sigwait (kind of an analogue to select(2), but for
signals rather than I/O) re-enables ignored signals in its list under
Linux, but not FreeBSD. The sesman daemon uses SIGCHLD to clean up
after a session
