Outback Dingo writes:
> Actually i question why the extra tcl is even required.
I took a quick look at the sources and there are tcl scripts providing
part of the build infrastructure. A few other things, too, but that was
enough to explain the dependency.
__
Actually i question why the extra tcl is even required.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:03 AM, andrew clarke wrote:
> On Tue 2009-11-10 15:51:11 UTC+0100, Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote:
>
> > As you have seen, the up-to-date sqlite port requires tcl for
> > *building*. A few of you complained a
On Tue 2009-11-10 15:51:11 UTC+0100, Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> As you have seen, the up-to-date sqlite port requires tcl for
> *building*. A few of you complained about it, but I don't understand why
> you are not complaining about ports that have perl or python configure
> scripts, t
As you have seen, the up-to-date sqlite port requires tcl for
*building*. A few of you complained about it, but I don't understand why
you are not complaining about ports that have perl or python configure
scripts, too ;-)
Said so, I have a patch to switch the sqlite port to use the
"amalgamation"
