On 2016-Dec-12, at 12:59 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> [Top post asking if you (Gerald) think portmaster is in
> error and so if a bugzilla report should be made.]
>
> Do you expect that portmaster should instead/also(first)
> be checking (using the gcc6:lang/gcc6 related example
> from USE_GCC=any
[Top post asking if you (Gerald) think portmaster is in
error and so if a bugzilla report should be made.]
Do you expect that portmaster should instead/also(first)
be checking (using the gcc6:lang/gcc6 related example
from USE_GCC=any): "pkg query %n-%v gcc6" instead of
checking "pkg query %n-%v l
On 2016-Dec-11, at 3:11 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 02:59:36PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>> I tend to have powerpc64 and powerpc patches because of my
>> experimenting with clang targeting them and that the standard
>> powerpc64 build does not boot PowerMac G5's reliably.
>
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 02:59:36PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> I tend to have powerpc64 and powerpc patches because of my
> experimenting with clang targeting them and that the standard
> powerpc64 build does not boot PowerMac G5's reliably.
Is that on 10, 11 or -current?
On 10 I remember being
[After "BUILD_DEPENDS+= gcc6:lang/gcc6" below shows that
portmaster does not do what you indicate the build environment
should do. The beginning is not essential material.]
On 2016-Dec-11, at 4:40 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Mark Millard wrote:
>> I reported already that dev
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Mark Millard wrote:
> I reported already that devel/kBuild/Makefile has in its
> Makefile:
>
> USE_GCC= any
>
> and devel/kBuild is what causes the lang/gcc* build. (I
> reported more than that but it is the part relevant here.)
I had read that, and I di investigate.
USE_G
On 2016-Dec-11, at 1:39 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Mark Millard wrote:
>> [Top post of example lack of lang/gcc6-devel vs. lan/gcc6
>> substitutability. Context /usr/ports/ at -r428325 (other
>> than a few specially controlled items.]
>
> I had another look,
Hi Mark,
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Mark Millard wrote:
> [Top post of example lack of lang/gcc6-devel vs. lan/gcc6
> substitutability. Context /usr/ports/ at -r428325 (other
> than a few specially controlled items.]
I had another look, and lang/gcc6 and lang/gcc6-devel really are
substitutable in what
[Top post of example lack of lang/gcc6-devel vs. lan/gcc6
substitutability. Context /usr/ports/ at -r428325 (other
than a few specially controlled items.]
After installing lang/gcc6-devel something else indirectly
forced lang/gcc6 to try to build. The attempt failed with:
Installing gcc6-6.2.0...
On 2016-Nov-25, at 11:47 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Mark Millard wrote:
>> I wonder if that leaves lang/gcc and lang/gcc49 as conflicting.
>
> Yes, these two ports conflict for the time being, and are properly
> marked as such.
>
> (And I am looking for a more elegant appr
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Mark Millard wrote:
> I wonder if that leaves lang/gcc and lang/gcc49 as conflicting.
Yes, these two ports conflict for the time being, and are properly
marked as such.
(And I am looking for a more elegant approach going forward, in
particular when we move into GCC 5 territo
On 2016-Nov-25, at 5:00 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2016, at 01:13, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> Author: dim (src committer)
>>> Date: Fri Nov 25 12:54:01 2016
>>> New Revision: 427110
>>> URL:
>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/427110
>>>
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> Fix build of lan
On 26 Nov 2016, at 01:13, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> Author: dim (src committer)
>> Date: Fri Nov 25 12:54:01 2016
>> New Revision: 427110
>> URL:
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/427110
>>
>>
>> Log:
>> Fix build of lang/gcc with libc++ 3.9.0, similar to r421625:
>> . . .
>> What
> Author: dim (src committer)
> Date: Fri Nov 25 12:54:01 2016
> New Revision: 427110
> URL:
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/427110
>
>
> Log:
> Fix build of lang/gcc with libc++ 3.9.0, similar to r421625:
> . . .
> What is happening here, is that the source file includes gcc/sy
14 matches
Mail list logo