On Thu, Aug 22, 2013, at 8:16, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:41:33 -0500
> Mark Felder wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 17:09, RW wrote:
>
> > > I see what's happened. Earlier in the year,against my better
> > > judgement, I move to CURRENT in futile attempt to make intel KMS
> > > work
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:41:33 -0500
Mark Felder wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 17:09, RW wrote:
> > I see what's happened. Earlier in the year,against my better
> > judgement, I move to CURRENT in futile attempt to make intel KMS
> > work. It looks like fuse has been moved into the base system,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 17:09, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:44:41 +0200
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
> > On 21/08/2013 23:39, RW wrote:
> > > The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
> > > suggest adding the line:
> > >
> > > fusefs_enable="YES"
> > >
> > > to
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:44:41 +0200
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 21/08/2013 23:39, RW wrote:
> > The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
> > suggest adding the line:
> >
> > fusefs_enable="YES"
> >
> > to rc.conf, but as far as I can see this doesn't affect anything
On 21/08/2013 23:39, RW wrote:
> The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
> suggest adding the line:
>
> fusefs_enable="YES"
>
> to rc.conf, but as far as I can see this doesn't affect anything since
> the port doesn't install an rc.d file. I would have expected suc
The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
suggest adding the line:
fusefs_enable="YES"
to rc.conf, but as far as I can see this doesn't affect anything since
the port doesn't install an rc.d file. I would have expected such a
file to load the fuse kernel module which
