On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 17:09, RW wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:44:41 +0200
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 21/08/2013 23:39, RW wrote:
The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
suggest adding the line:
fusefs_enable=YES
to rc.conf, but as far as
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:41:33 -0500
Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 17:09, RW wrote:
I see what's happened. Earlier in the year,against my better
judgement, I move to CURRENT in futile attempt to make intel KMS
work. It looks like fuse has been moved into the base system,
but
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013, at 8:16, RW wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:41:33 -0500
Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 17:09, RW wrote:
I see what's happened. Earlier in the year,against my better
judgement, I move to CURRENT in futile attempt to make intel KMS
work. It looks
The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
suggest adding the line:
fusefs_enable=YES
to rc.conf, but as far as I can see this doesn't affect anything since
the port doesn't install an rc.d file. I would have expected such a
file to load the fuse kernel module which
On 21/08/2013 23:39, RW wrote:
The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
suggest adding the line:
fusefs_enable=YES
to rc.conf, but as far as I can see this doesn't affect anything since
the port doesn't install an rc.d file. I would have expected such a
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:44:41 +0200
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 21/08/2013 23:39, RW wrote:
The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
suggest adding the line:
fusefs_enable=YES
to rc.conf, but as far as I can see this doesn't affect anything
since the
