John Reynolds wrote:
[ On Sunday, September 30, Philipp Ost wrote: ]
I disabled perl-support and all was fine...
For the sake of completeness:
H. Well, I depend quite heavily on the Perl support :( (and had
already disabled FXP). Does anybody have any experience on 6.2-STABLE or
= hello, I've been trying to upgrade ImageMagick for several days now
= but with no success. I'm on a -current system built about a month ago
= (Aug 31 19:52:08 MST 2007). I am using the default config of having
= TTF on, and FPX off.
The port has a maintainer, you know... I'm very interested in
hello, I've been trying to upgrade ImageMagick for several days now but with no
success. I'm on a -current system built about a month ago (Aug 31 19:52:08 MST
2007). I am using the default config of having TTF on, and FPX off.
I've even tried portupgrade -fR ImageMagick thinking that one of the
I just disabled fxp format in ImageMagick config. Maybe this one helps you too.
Cheers, Oliver
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 06:43:47AM -0700, John Reynolds wrote:
hello, I've been trying to upgrade ImageMagick for several days now but with
no
success. I'm on a -current system built about a month
Oliver Herold wrote:
I just disabled fxp format in ImageMagick config. Maybe this one helps you too.
I disabled perl-support and all was fine...
For the sake of completeness:
$ make showconfig
=== The following configuration options are available for
ImageMagick-6.3.5.10:
X11=on X11
[ On Sunday, September 30, Philipp Ost wrote: ]
I disabled perl-support and all was fine...
For the sake of completeness:
H. Well, I depend quite heavily on the Perl support :( (and had
already disabled FXP). Does anybody have any experience on 6.2-STABLE or
something other than
I test it with perl support disabled and it works.
[ On Sunday, September 30, Philipp Ost wrote: ]
I disabled perl-support and all was fine...
For the sake of completeness:
H. Well, I depend quite heavily on the Perl support :( (and had
already disabled FXP). Does anybody
