Andriy Gapon writes:
> On 19/02/2016 03:55, Perry Hutchison wrote:
>> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> On 17/02/2016 11:28, Perry Hutchison wrote:
I had not expected to find gcc listed (in packagesite.yaml) as a
dependency of the sysutils/cpuburn package. I
On 19/02/2016 03:55, Perry Hutchison wrote:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> On 17/02/2016 11:28, Perry Hutchison wrote:
>>> I had not expected to find gcc listed (in packagesite.yaml) as a
>>> dependency of the sysutils/cpuburn package. I can understand a
>>> _port_ needing gcc (at
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 17/02/2016 11:28, Perry Hutchison wrote:
> > I had not expected to find gcc listed (in packagesite.yaml) as a
> > dependency of the sysutils/cpuburn package. I can understand a
> > _port_ needing gcc (at build time), but does the cpuburn _package_
> >
On 17/02/2016 11:28, Perry Hutchison wrote:
> I had not expected to find gcc listed (in packagesite.yaml) as a
> dependency of the sysutils/cpuburn package. I can understand a
> _port_ needing gcc (at build time), but does the cpuburn _package_
> actually require gcc at _runtime_?
>
I don't
I had not expected to find gcc listed (in packagesite.yaml) as a
dependency of the sysutils/cpuburn package. I can understand a
_port_ needing gcc (at build time), but does the cpuburn _package_
actually require gcc at _runtime_?
___