Re: www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?

2013-06-20 Thread Paul Mather
On Jun 19, 2013, at 7:48 PM, "Steve Wills" wrote: >> I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated >> www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the >> port upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it >> complains it can't f

Re: www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?

2013-06-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:03:13PM -0500, James wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jerry wrote: > > > I totally agree. Plus, perhaps the port can be modified to use "env" > > to locate bash; ie, "\usr\bin\env bash". I use it all the time for > > shell scripts that I write for various syst

Re: www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?

2013-06-19 Thread Steve Wills
> I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated > www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the > port upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it > complains it can't find "bash" and Rails apps won't spawn. > > I don't have

Re: www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?

2013-06-11 Thread Paul Mather
On Jun 11, 2013, at 10:04 AM, "Steve Wills" wrote: >> I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated >> www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the >> port upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it >> complains it can't

Re: www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?

2013-06-11 Thread James
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jerry wrote: > I totally agree. Plus, perhaps the port can be modified to use "env" > to locate bash; ie, "\usr\bin\env bash". I use it all the time for > shell scripts that I write for various systems and it hasn't failed > me yet. Aye. bapt@ is working on

Re: www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?

2013-06-11 Thread Jerry
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:51:02 +0200 Eitan Adler articulated: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Steve Wills > wrote: > >> I've included at the end a snippet from httpd-error.log showing the > >> behaviour of the new Passenger 4.0.5 prior to the workaround I put > >> in place mentioned in the prece

Re: www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?

2013-06-11 Thread Eitan Adler
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Steve Wills wrote: >> I've included at the end a snippet from httpd-error.log showing the >> behaviour of the new Passenger 4.0.5 prior to the workaround I put in >> place mentioned in the preceding paragraph. > > I think it only calls bash like that when it crashe

Re: www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?

2013-06-11 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Steve Wills wrote: >> I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated >> www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the >> port upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it >> complains it can't

Re: www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?

2013-06-11 Thread Steve Wills
> I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated > www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the > port upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it > complains it can't find "bash" and Rails apps won't spawn. > > I don't have

www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?

2013-06-11 Thread Paul Mather
I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the port upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it complains it can't find "bash" and Rails apps won't spawn. I don't have shells/b