On 5/27/2014 13:43, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
>
> The 2.0.1 version was released instead, and I am sending the PR with
> update tonight, so, please, close the current PR as we're doing
> proper version bump.
Okay, but I prefer to keep everything on the same PR. Can you just mail
the patches as
On 5/27/2014 00:03, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
>
> I've asked him for confirmation if what's up there now
> (24f638daa0c28a9d44db2282d46ea3edfd4c7d11a656e38677b741620bf1483d) is
> what he wants it to be, and it if is, then we'll get distfiles fixed,
> hopefully, for the last time, as I've also as
On 5/26/2014 22:31, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
>
> Wiadomość napisana przez Bartłomiej Rutkowski w dniu
> 26 maj 2014, o godz. 22:23:
>
>>
>> Wiadomość napisana przez John Marino w dniu 26
>> maj 2014, o godz. 22:18:
>>
>>> On 5/26/2014 2
On 5/26/2014 22:12, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
> SHA256 (demjson-2.0.tar.gz) =
> 24f638daa0c28a9d44db2282d46ea3edfd4c7d11a656e38677b741620bf1483d
> SIZE (demjson-2.0.tar.gz) = 115914
>
> what perfectly matches what the author says it should be. I've asked him if
> he can check his release syste
On 5/26/2014 21:36, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
> I've just mailed the upstream, explaining the situation and
> suggesting releasing such changes as minor version numbers, like
> 2.0.1 or something similar. We'll see what, if any response will I
> receive, but for now, please, patch the port with n
The following reply was made to PR ports/186284; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Marino
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/186284: lang/python27: [PATCH] Several python ports fail
after staging due to library that links itself
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:39:07 +0100
On 12/24/2013 17:54, William Grzybowski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, John Marino
> wrote:
>> The impact is that they will disappear from dports, because we don't
>> feature ports that can't have binary packages. I'm sure there was a
>> good
On 12/24/2013 17:33, William Grzybowski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:26 PM, John Marino
> wrote:
>> Recently, probably caused by recent changes to devel/py-setuptools,
>> around 6 ports broke all in the same way. An example is below:
>> Is python@ aware and are
Recently, probably caused by recent changes to devel/py-setuptools,
around 6 ports broke all in the same way. An example is below:
> ===
> ===> brebis-0.8 depends on package: py33-setuptools>0 - not found
> ===>Verifying install for py33-setup
On 11/21/2013 12:52, William Grzybowski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:48 AM, John Marino
> wrote:
>> On 11/11/2013 16:22, William Grzybowski wrote:
>> Hi William,
>> It appears this exp-run was performed a week ago
>> (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cg
On 11/11/2013 16:22, William Grzybowski wrote:
> We are aware of the issue.
>
> --record option from setup.py is registering a directory whereas it
> should not. It is believed the update from distribute to setuptools
> will fix this issue, but it is pending an exp-run ports/183726.
>
Hi William
I have discovered at least 3 python ports that use
PYDISTUTILS_AUTOPLIST, and fail to package due to faulty generated plists.
The ports are:
www/py-flexget
devel/py-robotframework-ride
science/py-pydap/
errors seen during repo creation:
> pkg-static: /packages/All/py27-robotframework-ride-1
On 11/3/2013 16:24, William Grzybowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you please give it another go with r332618?
>
Hi William,
That simple one-liner worked like magic.
Thanks!
John
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
On 10/29/2013 11:15, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 8:18 PM, Marcus von Appen wrote:
>>
>> For those with too much free time at their hands: feel free to go
>> through John's list
>> and fix the ports to use a proper python version at build time instead
>> of `python` :-).
>>
>
> Thanks for
Per IRC conversation with mva, I'm sending python@ a list of ports that
currently don't build in DragonFly poudriere due to ports infrastructure
problems. I have not changed the python default in make.conf. It would
be nice to get Mk/bsd.python.mk (or whatever) fixed so these ports build
in poudr
The following reply was made to PR ports/178008; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Marino
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/178008: www/py-djangotoolbox: unfetchable distfile, fragile
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:34:32 +0200
On 21 Apr 2013, John Hixson wrote:
> I
On 3/26/2013 06:00, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Hi John,
Thank you for your efforts. This is what I'm trying to compile:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/py-qt.tgz
Would you please confirm, I merged it right?
PS. Unfortunately, this port is unmaintained, so in that case it's up to
submitter to pro
The following reply was made to PR ports/177350; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Marino
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/177350: x11-toolkits/py-qt: [PATCH] fix provided from
DragonFly
Ports
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:26:17 +0100
From that error log, I'd say
18 matches
Mail list logo
