/var/named Changes Ownership to Root on Boot

2008-03-20 Thread Martin McCormick
About half of the 7 FreeBSD systems I run exhibit a very annoying behavior that I have not pinned down yet as to why and how to correct it. I reboot. Soon, I find that bind isn't running. It runs as a low-priority process and is owned by bind so it needs to have write permission in

some problems after upgrading to 7.0-RELEASE

2008-03-20 Thread Novembre
Hi all, I have a couple of questions regarding my upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 7.0-RELEASE following the instructions from the handbook step by step. After the upgrade, I made a custom kernel, and the only option I've added to /etc/make.conf is " CPUTYPE?=prescott ". 1) First question: I upgraded

Re: removable devices auto umounting

2008-03-20 Thread Da Rock
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 14:14 +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:55:37PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > > > > I'm just looking into the removable device issue for freebsd. I can see > > > > its easy enough to auto mount a removable device (although I could use > > > > some help gett

Re: /var/named Changes Ownership to Root on Boot

2008-03-20 Thread Derek Ragona
At 06:30 PM 3/20/2008, Martin McCormick wrote: About half of the 7 FreeBSD systems I run exhibit a very annoying behavior that I have not pinned down yet as to why and how to correct it. I reboot. Soon, I find that bind isn't running. It runs as a low-priority process and is owne

Re: /var/named Changes Ownership to Root on Boot

2008-03-20 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Martin McCormick wrote: I reboot. Soon, I find that bind isn't running. It runs as a low-priority process and is owned by bind so it needs to have write permission in /var/named. When I do ls -ld on /var/named, it's owned by root. /var/named is owned by root

Re: some problems after upgrading to 7.0-RELEASE

2008-03-20 Thread Derek Ragona
At 06:10 PM 3/20/2008, Novembre wrote: Hi all, I have a couple of questions regarding my upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 7.0-RELEASE following the instructions from the handbook step by step. After the upgrade, I made a custom kernel, and the only option I've added to /etc/make.conf is " CPUTYPE?=pr

Re: removable devices auto umounting

2008-03-20 Thread Michael Ross
Am Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:40:39 +1000 schrieb Da Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That last point would only occur if the device was still being written > to- right? No. Removing a mounted device will cause a panic, writes pending or not. Maybe look at the emulators/mtools port, which gives you access

tsocks not working with firefox

2008-03-20 Thread Steve Franks
Hi. I'm setting up a ssh tunnel to a secure server for my surfing. If I configure firefox to use the appropriate proxy directly (i.e. localhost:8080 in socks under firefox preferences) it works as expected. I have set up /etc/tsocks.conf to send everything to localhost:8080 as in all the example

Re: /var/named Changes Ownership to Root on Boot

2008-03-20 Thread Martin McCormick
Chuck Swiger writes: >/var/named is owned by root on all of my newer (5.x and later) >systems; I found an old 4.11 box with it owned by bind, though. If >you're using named chroot'ed (as recommended), it will want /var/named/ >var/{dump/log/run/stats} writable by bind. That's pretty

Powerpc port

2008-03-20 Thread K. Bradford
I have installed 7.0-RELEASE on an old Mac G4. I have cvs'ed the latest sources (using the RELENG_7 tag) in order to track 7.0-STABLE. The problem: I can boot only off the FreeBSD install CD, by breaking into open firmware upon bootup like this: 0 > boot mac-io/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Gcc and make not producing executable

2008-03-20 Thread Eduardo Cerejo
> Eduardo Cerejo wrote: > >> On Linux systems, there is no base system 'make', so GNU make is > >> installed as 'make'. On FreeBSD systems, there is a base system make > >> that is maintained by the FreeBSD project, so GNU make is installed as > >> 'gmake'. The main differences in making with them

Re: some problems after upgrading to 7.0-RELEASE

2008-03-20 Thread Novembre
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > At 06:10 PM 3/20/2008, Novembre wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a couple of questions regarding my upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to > 7.0-RELEASE following the instructions from the handbook step by step. > After the upgrad

Re: some problems after upgrading to 7.0-RELEASE

2008-03-20 Thread Peter Boosten
Novembre wrote: Anyhow, smbd was looking for libgnutls.so.13 which I don't have, but I do have a libgnutls.so.26 and libgnutls.so in /usr/local/lib/ (the latter is a symlink to the former). Also, libgnutls.so.15 exists in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/. So what I did was creating a symlink to libg

Re: some problems after upgrading to 7.0-RELEASE

2008-03-20 Thread Novembre
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Peter Boosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Novembre wrote: > > > > Anyhow, smbd was looking for libgnutls.so.13 which I don't have, but I > > do have a libgnutls.so.26 and libgnutls.so in /usr/local/lib/ (the > > latter is a symlink to the former). Also, l

Re: some problems after upgrading to 7.0-RELEASE

2008-03-20 Thread Peter Boosten
Novembre wrote: I've read UPDATING before doing anything, but I assumed that " portupgrade -faP " also covers that part about gnutls as well. Isn't it true? Unless portupgrade did upgrade samba first and then gnutls, which means it's not smart enough! Am I wrong? Probably not :-) In my expe

Re: python ports

2008-03-20 Thread Nikola Lečić
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:40:26 +0100 Andreas Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > # portversion -vL= > py24-tkinter-2.4.4_2< needs updating (port has 2.5.2_2) > python24-2.4.4_2< needs updating (port has 2.4.5)

Re: OpenOffice 2.3

2008-03-20 Thread Nikola Lečić
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:55:56 +0300 "Mike Barnard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am running FreeBSD 7.0 Pre-Release on an HP 6720s Laptop. I am > experiencing a strange problem with OpenOffice. > > Every time i open a document/spreadsh

xorg signal 6 & signal 10

2008-03-20 Thread Lyle Miller
im trying freebsd7 amd64. i installed xorg after portsnap fetch and portsnap extract (make install clean > build.log). i did Xorg --configure then Xorg --config xorg.conf.new. i get a "(Xorg), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped)" in my syslog and i get a "Fatal server error: Caught signal

Re: i have questions

2008-03-20 Thread Ko Htoo
Are you crazy ? you are bastard .!$%$#@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]&[EMAIL PROTECTED]&@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]&[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%#&^%#% On 3/20/08, Paul A. Procacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lawyer Q8 wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Please i have FreeBSD 6.3 RELEASE i want to

Re: python ports

2008-03-20 Thread Andreas Pettersson
On fre, 2008-03-21 at 05:24 +0100, Nikola Lečić wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:40:26 +0100 > Andreas Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > # portversion -vL= > > py24-tkinter-2.4.4_2< needs updating (port has

<    1   2