2009/5/25 Peter Boosten :
> Chris Rees wrote:
>> 2009/5/25 Wojciech Puchar :
> first - says that it's measure of CPU load
> then - "or waiting for short-term events such as disk I/O" - which is NOT
> measure of CPU load.
>
Er, what? Of course it is!
>>> amount of disk I/O
Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/5/25 Wojciech Puchar :
first - says that it's measure of CPU load
then - "or waiting for short-term events such as disk I/O" - which is NOT
measure of CPU load.
>>> Er, what? Of course it is!
>>>
>> amount of disk I/O is a measure of CPU load? seems you
2009/5/25 Wojciech Puchar :
>>> first - says that it's measure of CPU load
>>> then - "or waiting for short-term events such as disk I/O" - which is NOT
>>> measure of CPU load.
>>>
>>
>> Er, what? Of course it is!
>>
> amount of disk I/O is a measure of CPU load? seems you are true expert ;)
>
Do
> Lars Eighner wrote:
>> That is all the ASCII codes there are. ASCII is a a seven-bit standard.
>
>> There is no such thing as ASCII codes from 160-255. ASCII is a 7-bit
>> standard. You cannot express 160 in seven bits.
>
>
>> No, because there are no ASCII codes between 128 and 159. ASCI
first - says that it's measure of CPU load
then - "or waiting for short-term events such as disk I/O" - which is NOT
measure of CPU load.
Er, what? Of course it is!
amount of disk I/O is a measure of CPU load? seems you are true expert ;)
___
freebs
first - says that it's measure of CPU load
then - "or waiting for short-term events such as disk I/O" - which is NOT
measure of CPU load.
You are mistaken. I think what you are referring to is the percentage of
no i'm not. doing lots of I/O and little CPU load produces high "load
average
Yes, you're right; ASCII is a seven bit code. Only E-ASCII employs the
8th bit to widen the addressing space available, thus it can define
more characters in binary.
/RM
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
2009/5/24 Wojciech Puchar :
>> From the glossary (p. 630) of _The_Design_and_Implementation_of_the
>> _FreeBSD_Operating_System_ by McKusick and Neville-Neil:
>>
>> load average A measure of CPU load on the system. The load
>> average
>> in FreeBSD is an average of the nu
Yuri wrote:
> Look below: load over 7 and no processes take much CPU.
>
> Yuri
>
> 7.2-PRERELEASE, 32-bit on i7-920.
>
>
> last pid: 93192; load averages: 7.68, 6.27,
> 4.61
Lars Eighner wrote:
That is all the ASCII codes there are. ASCII is a a seven-bit standard.
There is no such thing as ASCII codes from 160-255. ASCII is a 7-bit
standard. You cannot express 160 in seven bits.
No, because there are no ASCII codes between 128 and 159. ASCII is a 7-bit
s
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Kelly Jones wrote:
"man ascii" defines the ASCII codes from 0-127,
That is all the ASCII codes there are. ASCII is a a seven-bit standard.
and the various ISO-8859-x tables define the ASCII codes from 160-255
No. There is no such thing as ASCII codes from 160-255. A
Maybe you're looking for this?
http://www.petefreitag.com/cheatsheets/ascii-codes/
This one is quite specific, though...
http://www.ascii.cl/htmlcodes.htm
Regards,
Ronny Mandal
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
On Sun, 24 May 2009 20:22:37 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar
wrote, *again* without attribution:
>> From the glossary (p. 630) of _The_Design_and_Implementation_of_the
>> _FreeBSD_Operating_System_ by McKusick and Neville-Neil:
>>
>> load average A measure of CPU load on the system. T
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
