Re: off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Linksys, DLink, etc. Cheap is cheap You gave examples of WORST CRAP, and not really cheap. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-un

Re: Sponsoring FreeBSD

2009-06-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I follow the list regularly but haven't posted any messages so far (that I can recall, at least), in the few years subscribed. I participate a little more actively in a few other lists, as well; but honestly I haven't seen a list as polluted as this one. The remarkable thing is that almost all th

Re: Sponsoring FreeBSD

2009-06-19 Thread Diego Schulz
Excuse me, this thread was about..? I follow the list regularly but haven't posted any messages so far (that I can recall, at least), in the few years subscribed. I participate a little more actively in a few other lists, as well; but honestly I haven't seen a list as polluted as this one. The rem

Re: backdoor threat

2009-06-19 Thread prad
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:39:35 -0400 Bill Moran wrote: > Sure. It costs almost nothing to send a fax message, and he could > send it over and over and run you out of paper and ink while you're > sleeping. Infantile, yes. > yes except for the fact that i don't have a fax machine and the number is

Re: off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread David N
2009/6/20 Nikos Vassiliadis : > Jerry B. Altzman wrote: >> >> Do you require Gigabit ethernet or no? > > That, I don't know yet... but given that they want to build > a solid infrastructure that will be worth of using for the > years to come, most probably yes. > > Environmental conditions will be

Re: off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
Jerry B. Altzman wrote: Do you require Gigabit ethernet or no? That, I don't know yet... but given that they want to build a solid infrastructure that will be worth of using for the years to come, most probably yes. Environmental conditions will be normal, everything will be indoor. And I *thi

Re: off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread Gary Gatten
Linksys, DLink, etc. Cheap is cheap - Original Message - From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org To: Nikos Vassiliadis Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Sent: Fri Jun 19 09:45:22 2009 Subject: Re: off topic: unmanageable switch? Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > Hi, > > This has nothing t

ZFS and block device replication

2009-06-19 Thread Mister Olli
Hi, I'm starting digging into FreeBSD and ZFS and came up with a question which is bothering me. I'm thinking about placing block device replication (e.g. via DRDB or NDB) under a ZFS/ ZVOL. It would improve replication as it's done immediately, not within a time-frame (as the 'zfs [send/receive]

Re: freebsd mass deployment

2009-06-19 Thread Martin Thomas
Thanks for the advice given so far, I will have a look at them. @Wojciech: Your approach seems too simplistic to me. It might only work under very specific circumstances but is impractical otherwise. Consider, for example, a network consisting of machines of different types (workstations, web

Re: Processes dying with signal 11

2009-06-19 Thread Peter Giessel
On Friday, June 19, 2009, at 12:21PM, "Bruce Cran" wrote: >Unfortunately memtest86+ runs on x86 hardware and this is a >PowerPC iBook. Being Apple hardware there's not much swapping of >hardware I can do - I'll run a few more tests but I guess it's probably >time to chuck it away. Try running Me

Re: Processes dying with signal 11

2009-06-19 Thread Glen Barber
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Bruce Cran wrote: > > Unfortunately memtest86+ runs on x86 hardware and this is a > PowerPC iBook. Yeah... I apparently had already forgotten it was a PPC machine. Ooops. :) -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd

Re: freebsd mass deployment

2009-06-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
similar for FreeBSD too. So far I only found a guide for jumpstart. simply install on one, tar it up and untar on each other, using PXE just to boot anything. Wojciech, That is true, yes, but you have not answered the OPs question. Yes i did - it is the way of doing repetitive installation

Re: freebsd mass deployment

2009-06-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I used SystemImager for Linux installs, and I was curious about doing something similar for FreeBSD. By chance, I ran across this today, and now I am very excited about trying it out. farbot port looks like you - as most people - like to make your life complex. unix already have all needed to

Re: Processes dying with signal 11

2009-06-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I would suspect hardware. Most probably RAM than anything else initially. Can you run memtest86+? on Mac? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre

Re: Processes dying with signal 11

2009-06-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
The problem I see is that after a few hours of running buildworld, when it starts building clang itself, 'as' crashes with a signal 11. always at the same point or in random places? if first - it's probably not hardware problem. It's at a random location, but it always happens after the build

Re: freebsd mass deployment

2009-06-19 Thread Jason
I used SystemImager for Linux installs, and I was curious about doing something similar for FreeBSD. By chance, I ran across this today, and now I am very excited about trying it out. farbot port http://code.google.com/p/farbot/ -jgh On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:01:42AM +, Martin Thomas thu

Re: gmplayer cannot show video in xfce4

2009-06-19 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 6/19/09, Carmel NY wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:05:13 +0200 > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote: > >> Not from console; from xterm. And if xv is not available, x11 is just >> fine(but slow). > > This is everything: > > MPlayer 1.0rc2-4.2.1 (C) 2000-2007 MPlayer Team > CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Cor

Re: Processes dying with signal 11

2009-06-19 Thread Bruce Cran
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:35:09 -0400 Glen Barber wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Glen Barber > wrote: > > I would suspect hardware.  Most probably RAM than anything else > > initially.  Can you run memtest86+? > > > > Also, for what it's worth, I had this similar scenario a few years > a

Re: Processes dying with signal 11

2009-06-19 Thread Glen Barber
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > I would suspect hardware.  Most probably RAM than anything else > initially.  Can you run memtest86+? > Also, for what it's worth, I had this similar scenario a few years ago. After numerous hardware replacements (RAM, motherboard, etc, etc) i

Re: Processes dying with signal 11

2009-06-19 Thread Glen Barber
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Bruce Cran wrote: > > It's at a random location, but it always happens after the build has > been running for a few hours and when it's ended up swapping some > processes out of main memory.  I've read > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/troubleshoot.html#SIGN

Re: Processes dying with signal 11

2009-06-19 Thread Bruce Cran
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:04:26 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > up-to-date HEAD: > > > > FreeBSD mac.draftnet 8.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Jun 16 22:07:11 BST 2009 > > bru...@mac.draftnet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/IBOOK powerpc > > > > The problem I see is that after a few hours of running buildworld, > >

Re: Changing my login directory

2009-06-19 Thread Karl Vogel
>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:13:32 -0400, >> Steve Bertrand said: S> I've got a couple of jails now that I use exclusively for Perl S> development. As soon as I log into the box via SSH, my first command is S> _always_ "cd devel/something". I'd like to make it so that '~' remains S> /home/steve,

Re: Processes dying with signal 11

2009-06-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
up-to-date HEAD: FreeBSD mac.draftnet 8.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Jun 16 22:07:11 BST 2009 bru...@mac.draftnet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/IBOOK powerpc The problem I see is that after a few hours of running buildworld, when it starts building clang itself, 'as' crashes with a signal 11. always at the same p

Re: backdoor threat

2009-06-19 Thread Bill Moran
In response to prad : > i just received this 'threat' from someone on a forum: Stay off that forum. Sounds annoying to me. > "+1.2507437628 <-- And,yes of course this is a fax, but I could > write and execute a script that would have some real fun with it.. > Don't you think. Especially fro

backdoor threat

2009-06-19 Thread prad
i just received this 'threat' from someone on a forum: "+1.2507437628 <-- And,yes of course this is a fax, but I could write and execute a script that would have some real fun with it.. Don't you think. Especially from a BSD server ;) You missed a small back door, if you're nice I'll help you

Re: gmplayer cannot show video in xfce4

2009-06-19 Thread Carmel NY
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:05:13 +0200 "Paul B. Mahol" wrote: > Not from console; from xterm. And if xv is not available, x11 is just > fine(but slow). This is everything: MPlayer 1.0rc2-4.2.1 (C) 2000-2007 MPlayer Team CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ (Family: 15, Model: 75, St

Re: Compact Freebsd 'appliance'

2009-06-19 Thread John Almberg
I have a couple of Via Artigo a2000 boxes, one running FreeBSD-STABLE (post 7.2) and the other running FreeNAS. Both work well. I've seen posts from one fellow who's tracking a bug with the vge interface under very heavy load, but both of mine stream music and do Time Machine backups via netata

Re: Compact Freebsd 'appliance'

2009-06-19 Thread Charlie Kester
On Fri 19 Jun 2009 at 07:24:58 PDT John Almberg wrote: Sounds good. They are so inexpensive, I will just give it a whirl and see if it cuts the mustard. Speed isn't really an issue, since it's going to be twiddling it's thumbs most of the time. Doesn't really matter if it takes 10 seconds or

Re: Compact Freebsd 'appliance'

2009-06-19 Thread George Hartzell
John Almberg writes: > I have a client who has an application that he wants to deploy in his > customer's offices as a headless 'appliance'. Basically, just a black > box that you can plug into a Lan, turn it on, and it runs. No floppy > disk or CD, no monitor/keyboard, just remotely mana

Re: Processes dying with signal 11

2009-06-19 Thread Glen Barber
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Bruce Cran wrote: > I've been trying to run a buildworld using the clangbsd branch on my > G4 iBook, but without success. I'm currently running a fairly > up-to-date HEAD: > > FreeBSD mac.draftnet 8.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Jun 16 22:07:11 BST 2009 > bru...@mac.draftnet:/

Re: gmplayer cannot show video in xfce4

2009-06-19 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 6/19/09, Carmel NY wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:08:59 +0200 > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote: > >> Somehow hal manages to break -vo xv ? Try with mplayer and see full >> error message. >> What video driver are you using? > > I am using the 'nv' driver. > > Using mplayer from the console does not pro

Processes dying with signal 11

2009-06-19 Thread Bruce Cran
I've been trying to run a buildworld using the clangbsd branch on my G4 iBook, but without success. I'm currently running a fairly up-to-date HEAD: FreeBSD mac.draftnet 8.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Jun 16 22:07:11 BST 2009 bru...@mac.draftnet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/IBOOK powerpc The problem I see is that af

Re: gmplayer cannot show video in xfce4

2009-06-19 Thread Carmel NY
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:08:59 +0200 "Paul B. Mahol" wrote: > Somehow hal manages to break -vo xv ? Try with mplayer and see full > error message. > What video driver are you using? I am using the 'nv' driver. Using mplayer from the console does not produce an error. Of course, all I get is the a

Re: The 'uname' output

2009-06-19 Thread Harry Matthiesen Jensen
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:31:38PM +0200, Harry Matthiesen Jensen wrote: > > > I have wondered why my build number in the 'uname' output not is > > > incrementet for each build I make of the system, it shows '#0' > > > all the time. > > > > Do you remove /usr/obj between builds? > > Yes, and goin

automount and sshfs

2009-06-19 Thread Michael Grant
sshfs is a file system that lets you mount a remote ftp dir on a directory using fuse. I have it working fine on freebsd. Instead of using the mount command to mount the fs, it's mounted by running the sshfs command. Is there some generic thing like amd that is not NFS specific that I could use

Re: gmplayer cannot show video in xfce4

2009-06-19 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 6/19/09, Carmel NY wrote: > When I start mplayer (gmplayer) from within xfce4 and attempt to play a > video, I receive an error message. The audio portion works fine however. > > The screen-shot of the error message is viewable here: > > http://imagebin.ca/view/OdMEXlY.html > > What is st

Re: WLAN with Thinkpad T41

2009-06-19 Thread Andrew Gould
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote: > Hi there, > > I have a Thinkpad T41 with FreeBSD 7.2/i386 > > With dmesg i see the wlan card: > > ath0: mem 0xc021-0xc021 irq 11 at device 2.0 on > pci2 ath0: [ITHREAD] > ath0: WARNING: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface > ath0

Re: off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread Peter
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > Hi, > > This has nothing to do with FreeBSD. I have to buy 3-4 24/16 > port ethernet switches for a school. Could you recommend a > brand/model? I don't know if such recommendations should be > done off list? Netgear - really cheap, no problems with them if inside(norma

WLAN with Thinkpad T41

2009-06-19 Thread Jochen Neumeister
Hi there, I have a Thinkpad T41 with FreeBSD 7.2/i386 With dmesg i see the wlan card: ath0: mem 0xc021-0xc021 irq 11 at device 2.0 on pci2 ath0: [ITHREAD] ath0: WARNING: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface ath0: Ethernet address: 00:05:4e:48:14:ab ath0: mac 5.6 phy 4.1 5ghz radio 1.7

Re: Compact Freebsd 'appliance'

2009-06-19 Thread John Almberg
On Jun 18, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Charlie Kester wrote: On Thu 18 Jun 2009 at 14:18:21 PDT Tim Judd wrote: I've read reports (and forgotten it's source since then) that some Intel Atom processors work well, some don't with FreeBSD. This was something I read within a couple months, so I would see

Re: off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread Jerry B. Altzman
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 06:22, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > My list of priorities, with 1 being the most important. > 1. Price > 2. Stability > 3. No "smart" features >OK, this looks like a .1Q frame, let's drop it. >This MAC address is active on many ports, let's drop it. > 4. STP

Re: freebsd mass deployment

2009-06-19 Thread Odhiambo ワシントン
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Wojciech Puchar < woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > >> I'd like to install FreeBSD on a number of machines, automatically and >> unattended over Ethernet via PXE. I'm quite familiar with FAI, which does a >> great job for Debian, and I'd like to know whether

Re: The 'uname' output

2009-06-19 Thread Harry Matthiesen Jensen
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:09:57PM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Harry Matthiesen Jensen typed: > > I have wondered why my build number in the 'uname' output not is > > incrementet for each build I make of the system, it shows '#0' > > all the time. > > D

Re: off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Olivier I'd choose 3com. Their low-end unmanaged models are pretty cheap as well as some smarter officeconnect models. They are not cheap ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To u

Re: off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Now I have had satisfaction with Dlink and Compex, maybe not among the cheapest, but still cheap. I have had some working for 6 or 7 years You are happy because you are using it with good power supply, probably UPS. Both (and D-Link mostly) are completely unprotected for even minor power sp

Re: off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
This has nothing to do with FreeBSD. I have to buy 3-4 24/16 port ethernet switches for a school. Could you recommend a brand/model? I don't know if such recommendations should be done off list? no idea about 4, but in my practice the cheapest ones are really good. _

Re: freebsd mass deployment

2009-06-19 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I'd like to install FreeBSD on a number of machines, automatically and unattended over Ethernet via PXE. I'm quite familiar with FAI, which does a great job for Debian, and I'd like to know whether there is something similar for FreeBSD too. So far I only found a guide for jumpstart. simply ins

Re: Configuring VLANs - Why is IP address require on NIC connected to Trunk?

2009-06-19 Thread Geoff Roberts
Hi, On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:16:18 am Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > Geoff Roberts wrote: > > I find I have to give the ext0 interface an IP address in order for > > routing and packet filtering to work on the attached VLANs. > > > > a) Is there a way to configure this so that I don't have to give ext0

Re: freebsd mass deployment

2009-06-19 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Thomas wrote: > Hello list, > > I'd like to install FreeBSD on a number of machines, automatically and > unattended over Ethernet via PXE. I'm quite familiar with FAI, which does a > great job for Debian, and I'd like to know whether there is

Re: The 'uname' output

2009-06-19 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Harry Matthiesen Jensen typed: > I have wondered why my build number in the 'uname' output not is > incrementet for each build I make of the system, it shows '#0' > all the time. > > Example output of 'uname -a': > > FreeBSD mugin-LAN.localhost 8.0-CURREN

Re: freebsd mass deployment

2009-06-19 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:01:42AM +, Martin Thomas typed: > > Hello list, > > I'd like to install FreeBSD on a number of machines, automatically and > unattended over Ethernet via PXE. I'm quite familiar with FAI, which does a > great job for Debian, and I'd like to know whether there is s

The 'uname' output

2009-06-19 Thread Harry Matthiesen Jensen
I have wondered why my build number in the 'uname' output not is incrementet for each build I make of the system, it shows '#0' all the time. Example output of 'uname -a': FreeBSD mugin-LAN.localhost 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Jun 18 12:41:05 CEST 2009 r...@mugin-lan.localhost:/usr/o

Re: off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread Jeff Laine
On Fri,06/19/09 [17:31:49], Olivier Nicole wrote: > Nikos, > > > My list of priorities, with 1 being the most important. > > 1. Price > > 2. Stability > > As the price is the most important for you, buy any cheap switch. > > Now I have had satisfaction with Dlink and Compex, maybe not among the

gmplayer cannot show video in xfce4

2009-06-19 Thread Carmel NY
When I start mplayer (gmplayer) from within xfce4 and attempt to play a video, I receive an error message. The audio portion works fine however. The screen-shot of the error message is viewable here: http://imagebin.ca/view/OdMEXlY.html What is strange is that the video was working until

freebsd mass deployment

2009-06-19 Thread Martin Thomas
Hello list, I'd like to install FreeBSD on a number of machines, automatically and unattended over Ethernet via PXE. I'm quite familiar with FAI, which does a great job for Debian, and I'd like to know whether there is something similar for FreeBSD too. So far I only found a guide for jumpstar

Re: off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread Olivier Nicole
Nikos, > My list of priorities, with 1 being the most important. > 1. Price > 2. Stability As the price is the most important for you, buy any cheap switch. Now I have had satisfaction with Dlink and Compex, maybe not among the cheapest, but still cheap. I have had some working for 6 or 7 years

off topic: unmanageable switch?

2009-06-19 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
Hi, This has nothing to do with FreeBSD. I have to buy 3-4 24/16 port ethernet switches for a school. Could you recommend a brand/model? I don't know if such recommendations should be done off list? My list of priorities, with 1 being the most important. 1. Price 2. Stability 3. No "smart" featu