On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Nice Script!
> I intend to steal parts of it for my own use.
It's great when you can plunder without robbing anyone :)
> > P.S. Maybe I ought to expand it to IPv6 considering that the IPv4
> > address space has [reportedly] finally ran out (is that t
On 10 February 2011 08:33, c0re wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I've got set of servers that uses NFS mounted /usr/ports. When I use
> "portupgrade samba" on 1st server it says
> [/usr/ports/INDEX-7.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid
> argument] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... -
> 2260
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> Ignoring the TRIM issue for a moment . . .
>
> You're probably best off saving SSD storage for cases where you have lots
> of reads and little to no write activity, unless you enjoy buying new
> SSDs a lot. Actually, let's not ignore TRIM; t
On Feb 11, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> also i noticed that when a processes CPU activity goes up to let's say 10% and
> then down again to 0% this doesn't mean that the idle process will jump to
> 200%
> instantly, but it takes ~ 10 seconds for it to reclaim the CPU activity that
> w
On Fri Feb 11 11, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> >> It means (c). Kernel activity, short-lived transient processes, and
> >> imperfections in sampling data are the other ~13 / 10 %
> >
> > thanks. it seems in some cases these imperfections have qui
On Feb 11, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
>> It means (c). Kernel activity, short-lived transient processes, and
>> imperfections in sampling data are the other ~13 / 10 %
>
> thanks. it seems in some cases these imperfections have quite an impact:
>
> last pid: 48135; load averag
On Fri Feb 11 11, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> > a) my system is 100% idle, since no processes except the idle process takes
> > up
> > up CPU time or
> > b) that a or some processes take up 2% CPU time which aren't being shown or
> > c) that each of
On Feb 11, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> a) my system is 100% idle, since no processes except the idle process takes up
> up CPU time or
> b) that a or some processes take up 2% CPU time which aren't being shown or
> c) that each of my cpu core is only 86.6/89.4% idle?
It means (c).
hi there,
i'm trying to decipher the following top(1) output:
otaku% top -PSHb -d2
last pid: 14206; load averages: 0.02, 0.04, 0.00 up 1+02:08:5801:13:21
256 processes: 3 running, 238 sleeping, 15 waiting
Mem: 1356M Active, 141M Inact, 342M Wired, 79M Cache, 212M Buf, 44M Free
Swap: 18
On 10/02/2011 15:37, Anonymous wrote:
David Demelier writes:
Hello,
The SDL's pkg-message says we can use video driver in tty terminal.
To do this you have to load the vesa kernel module or enable it in your
kernel, and set environment variable "SDL_VIDEODRIVER=vgl".
I tried it with mpl
David Demelier writes:
> On 10/02/2011 15:37, Anonymous wrote:
>> David Demelier writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The SDL's pkg-message says we can use video driver in tty terminal.
>>>
>>> To do this you have to load the vesa kernel module or enable it in your
>>> kernel, and set environment v
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:13:43 -0800
David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Christopher J. Ruwe
> wrote:
> > Since some weeks my local clock runs two hours early.
> > My /etc/localtime is a copy of /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Berlin
> > and I have set both ntpd_enable="YES" and nt
Nothing to do oh, freebsd-questions stay in bat!
2011/02/03 18:02:09 -0800 Rem P Roberti => To FreeBSD :
RPR> Now that I understand how to get a scanner working, if there are any
RPR> photographers out there who are using scanners with FreeBSD for
RPR> negatives or slides I would love to hear a
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:13:43 -0800
David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Christopher J. Ruwe
> wrote:
> > Since some weeks my local clock runs two hours early.
> > My /etc/localtime is a copy of /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Berlin
> > and I have set both ntpd_enable="YES" and nt
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> Since some weeks my local clock runs two hours early. My /etc/localtime
> is a copy of /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Berlin and I have set both
> ntpd_enable="YES" and ntpd_sync_on_start="YES".
ntpd has a sanity check -- if the clock is o
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:40:37AM +, Paul Macdonald wrote:
>
> I'd be interested to here peoples opinions on best uses for SSD, general
> purpose applications such as databases , webservers etc will benefit
> obviously,
>
> but i'm also curious as to disk intensive applications such as ma
On Feb 11, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> My ntp.conf consists of
>
> server ntp1.ptb.de prefer
> server ntp2.ptb.de
> restrict default ignore
> restrict 127.0.0.1
>
> Surely, I must be missing something. Does anybody have an idea?
What does "ntpq -p -c rv" indicate?
It wouldn'
Since some weeks my local clock runs two hours early. My /etc/localtime
is a copy of /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Berlin and I have set both
ntpd_enable="YES" and ntpd_sync_on_start="YES". My ntp.conf consists of
server ntp1.ptb.de prefer
server ntp2.ptb.de
restrict default ignore
restrict 127.0.0.
Hi Devin,
Thanks for sharing your work.
The list strips non-text attachments so there isn't much to see at the moment
though...
---
Fleuriot Damien
On 11 Feb 2011, at 04:53, Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to announce the release of a new script. A script that I've
> developed f
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 08:56 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hi Devin,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing your work.
>
> The list strips non-text attachments so there isn't much to see at the moment
> though...
Thanks Damien.
Here's a link to the pic I posted online in-tandem with the post to the
list
FreeBSD's current tftp client doesn't work with tftpd-hpa.
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT (XEN) #0: Fri Jan 21 15:54:41 EST 2011
~(fbpv)1% tftp 192.168.1.1
tftp> get pxeboot
Got ERROR packet: Unsupported option(s) requested
Error code 2048: Unsupported option(s) requested
tftp>
Anybody got a solution for t
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 349, Issue 8, Message: 15
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:53:53 -0800 Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to announce the release of a new script. A script that I've
> developed for our field engineers that I'd like to share with the rest
> of the world.
>
>
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:56:42 +0100
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> The list strips non-text attachments so there isn't much to see at
> the moment though...
It wasn't supposed to be attached - try
http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/download/host-setup.txt :)
--
Bruce Cran
___
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Guillermo Fernando Cotone <
guillermo.cot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 09:55 AM, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote:
> > And this construction work?
> >
> > ipv4_addrs_ed0="192.0.2.129/27 192.0.2.1-2/28 192.0.2.4-5/28"
> >
> It would work only if all the IPs w
11.02.2011 15:25, Guillermo Fernando Cotone wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 09:55 AM, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote:
>> And this construction work?
>>
>> ipv4_addrs_ed0="192.0.2.129/27 192.0.2.1-2/28 192.0.2.4-5/28"
>>
> It would work only if all the IPs were on the same subnet. If you want
> to use di
On 02/11/2011 09:55 AM, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote:
> And this construction work?
>
> ipv4_addrs_ed0="192.0.2.129/27 192.0.2.1-2/28 192.0.2.4-5/28"
>
It would work only if all the IPs were on the same subnet. If you want
to use different subnets you need to implement vlans on that interface
11.02.2011 8:07, Matthew Seaman пишет:
> ipv4_addrs_re0="xxx.xxx.yyy.134-147/23"
>
> See rc.conf(5) for details.
And this construction work?
ipv4_addrs_ed0="192.0.2.129/27 192.0.2.1-2/28 192.0.2.4-5/28"
--
Vladislav V. Prodan
VVP24-UANIC
+38[067]4584408
+38[099]4060508
vla...@jabber.ru
Nothing to do oh, freebsd-questions stay in bat!
2011/02/11 09:40:37 + Paul Macdonald => To FreeBSD
Mailing List :
PM> I'd be interested to here peoples opinions on best uses for SSD, general
PM> purpose applications such as databases , webservers etc will benefit
PM> obviously,
Sun.com b
Hi,
Is anyone using SSD drives on freeBSD server systems?
I'm attracted by the performance increases i've seen on both my desktops
and laptops (quite amazing and easy upgrade if you've not tried)..
I see from here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM#Operating_system_and_SSD_support
that
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robert Bonomi
> Sent: 11 February 2011 01:59 AM
> To: Vikash Badal
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: switching from gnu make to bsd make
>
> Try ty
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:17:57 -0500, Robert Ames wrote:
>
> I'm having problems trying to record from a sound card under
> 8.1-RELEASE. The last time I tried this was many releases ago,
> possibly 4.x-RELEASE. Back then I would do something like "cat
> /dev/dsp > file" but now when I try it I ju
31 matches
Mail list logo
