On 23.06.2011, at 16:08, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Peter Toth [2011-06-23 22:54:59 +1200]:
>
>> Did you set the mount point properly for your ZFS root? My previous post
>> was intended as an example only, you need to tailor it to your setup.
>> Also, you can use mfsbsd for installation very easy
When performing an update on the ports tree via "portsnap fetch update"
or when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying
large data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical
modelings) or when compiling world, FreeBD 9.0 and FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE
tend to "freeze"
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann :
Could you post /etc/sysctl.conf and /boot/loader.conf? Also, the
output of uname -a on all machines would be nice.
And since you don't use GENERIC, could you also tell us what
difference your setup is from a GENERIC kernel?
--
chs,
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann
> When performing an update on the ports tree via "portsnap fetch update" or
> when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying large
> data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical modelings) or
> when compiling world, FreeBD 9.0 and FreeBSD
On Wed Jul 6 11, arrowdodger wrote:
> 2011/7/6 O. Hartmann
>
> > When performing an update on the ports tree via "portsnap fetch update" or
> > when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying large
> > data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical modelings) or
Kurt Buff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:37, Yuri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I hit this problem periodically when a lot of disk space is gone and it's
> > hard to tell where did it go. Once it was thunderbird writing huge index
> > file as a consequence of some bug, on another occasion it was the
--- On Tue, 7/5/11, Ian Smith wrote:
> > Does anybody successfully use the "ipfw fwd"? If so
> in which FreeBSD version?
>
> Not I, but many do. On the face of it the rule looks
> correct. Do you
> have a TCP service running on localhost:1234 ? Does
> wlan0 exist? You
> may do better po
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Unga wrote:
> On Tue, 7/5/11, Ian Smith wrote:
> > > Does anybody successfully use the "ipfw fwd"? If so
> > > in which FreeBSD version?
>
> > Not I, but many do. On the face of it the rule looks
> > correct. Do you
> > have a TCP service running on localhost:1234 ?
Ideas anyone?
I am trying to rebuild SpamAssassin after a perl upgrade to 5.12.4 and
get this (I DID run perl-after-upgrade prior to this):
===> p5-Encode-Detect-1.01 depends on file:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12.4/Module/Build.pm - not found
===>Verifying install for
/usr/local/l
On 07/06/11 12:37, arrowdodger wrote:
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann
When performing an update on the ports tree via "portsnap fetch update" or
when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying large
data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical modelings) or
when compilin
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
> better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
> back to the old SCHED_4BSD scheduler.
>
If you are using MPI in numerical codes, th
On 07/06/11 18:28, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
back to the old SCHED_4BSD scheduler.
If you are usin
Hi,
p5-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56_1 and p5-ExtUtils-Install-1.54_1 conflict
both telling that the other one should be deleted.
So which one of the two to keep
so far, I opted for keeping p5-ExtUtils-Install-1.54_1, deleting
p5-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56_1, is this wise or should it be the other
way round
Has anyone re-run those IO benchmarks?
Something smells fishy there.. (with the benchmarking.)
adrian
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann :
> On 07/06/11 12:37, arrowdodger wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/6 O. Hartmann
>>
>>> When performing an update on the ports tree via "portsnap fetch update"
>>> or
>>> when checking
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 06:38:23PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 07/06/11 18:28, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
> >>better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of sugge
In message <20110706170132.ga68...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steve Kargl w
rites:
>I periodically ran the same type test in the 2008 post over the
>last three years. Nothing has changed. I even set up an account
>on one node in my cluster for jeffr to use. He was too busy to
>investigate a
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:05:41PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20110706170132.ga68...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steve Kargl
> w
> rites:
>
> >I periodically ran the same type test in the 2008 post over the
> >last three years. Nothing has changed. I even set up an account
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>
> >> I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
> >> better on multicor
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>
>> I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
>> better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
>> back to the old SCHED_4B
On 06/07/2011 17:40, n dhert wrote:
> p5-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56_1 and p5-ExtUtils-Install-1.54_1 conflict
> both telling that the other one should be deleted.
> So which one of the two to keep
> so far, I opted for keeping p5-ExtUtils-Install-1.54_1, deleting
> p5-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56_1, is thi
On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
b
On 07/06/11 13:00, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:05:41PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message<20110706170132.ga68...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steve Kargl w
rites:
I periodically ran the same type test in the 2008 post over the
last three years. Nothing has changed.
On 7/6/11, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I use SCHED_UL
* Todor Dragnev [2011-07-06 10:43:17 +0300]:
Inline reply:
>
> Hi Chris
>
> I just installed ZFS on ROOT on two 1TB SATA disks:
>
> First you need to download freebsd 8.2 memstick release
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html
I did this via VirtualBox first, so the livefs i
Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
thanks,
Adrian
On 7 July 2011 05:00, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
>>> wrote:
O
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
>
steve == ENOMONEY && jeffr == ENOTIME
And, 4BSD works.
--
Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
On 7 July 2011 09:51, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
>>
>
> steve == ENOMONEY && jeffr == ENOTIME
>
> And, 4BSD works.
I meant it as a more general observation.
If something doesn't work as needed, consid
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:39:00AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 7 July 2011 09:51, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
> >>
> >
> > steve == ENOMONEY && jeffr == ENOTIME
> >
> > And, 4BSD works.
>
> I me
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 7 July 2011 09:51, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
>>>
>>
>> steve == ENOMONEY && jeffr == ENOTIME
>>
>> And, 4BSD works.
>
> I meant it as a
29 matches
Mail list logo
