Здравствуйте, Marco.
Вы писали 1 сентября 2011 г., 23:35:49:
MB On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, the wise Коньков Евгений wrote:
Notice: [B1] IFACE: Add route 0.0.0.0/0 130.115.3.34 failed: File exists
You already have default route in your system
why you set up the default again?
Notice in conf:
set
Apologies to anyone this message appears weird to up front; I'm doing
some work on my Windows 7 Partition, and though I'm going to try and
make sure this isn't a crappy email message, we all know how Windows can
be. I've made sure it's plain text and all but if this appears weird to
anyone, I'm
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Gary Dunn wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 12:55 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Gary Dunn wrote:
I have studied that and the source to what seems to be a driver,
fujitsu-usb-touchscreen.
This may be what you already
- launch dhclient manually
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/wlan-setup-tp4748233p4761835.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
- FreeBSD 9 has latest wpa_supplicant.
- Try upgrading router's firmware.
- Try detailing wpa_supplicant.conf more.
eg. proto=
pairwise=
group=
regards,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/wlan-setup-tp4748233p4761824.html
Sent from the
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, the wise Коньков Евгений wrote:
set iface route 130.115.0.0/16
you say that behind tunnele thereis 130.115.0.0/16 subnet, but
MB [B1] 130.115.85.11 - 130.115.3.35
you have address from subnet 130.115.0.0/16 addres on local machine
so you get this message:
MB Loop detected
On 31/08/2011 23:45, David Brodbeck wrote:
I'm testing FreeBSD 9.0-BETA with an eye toward eventually using
FreeBSD 9.0 to replace some existing OpenSolaris 2008.11
installations. I've found NFS file creation performance (as measured
by Bonnie++) is equally slow for both with default settings.
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:43:12 -0400, Allen wrote:
I don't know a lot about Gnome3, because a lot of my machines aren't
very powerful by today's standards, and if what I read on RAM
requirements was true, I won't be able to use it on any machine except
this one anyway. I can't Believe how bad
Is it possible to mount a ufs partition writable by group wheel? How would
the fstab entry look?
Thanks,
Michael M
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:01+0200, Michael M wrote:
Is it possible to mount a ufs partition writable by group wheel? How would
the fstab entry look?
It really depends on what you want to achieve.
If it's okay that the (local) root directory of said
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:01:58 +0200, Michael M wrote:
Is it possible to mount a ufs partition writable by group wheel?
It is. :-)
How would
the fstab entry look?
Maybe like this:
# Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass
# - -
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Sep 2 06:30:22 2011
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:01:58 +0200
From: Michael M thecr...@gmail.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Mount a ufs partition writable by group wheel?
Is it possible to mount a ufs partition writable by group
Excuse my generic question, I should have asked:
Can the group rw options for given partition destination be defined in fstab
upon mount?
Thanks,
Michael M
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.comwrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Sep 2
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:08:08 +0200, Michael M wrote:
Excuse my generic question, I should have asked:
Can the group rw options for given partition destination be defined in fstab
upon mount?
No. The access rights depend on the owner:group permissions
of the mountpoint directory. The _act_ of
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:08:08 +0200, Michael M wrote:
Excuse my generic question, I should have asked:
Can the group rw options for given partition destination be defined in
fstab
upon mount?
No. The access rights depend
Hi,
Anybody know the editorial/publisher of the psSense book?
Thanks,
--
Alejandro Imass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:50:18 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
It looks like the best bet would be fsdb, assuming that it is a UFS file
system. That does have a 'findblk' command to find a file containing a
block, but you would need to calculate the block offset in the
filesystem first. It
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:33:22 -0400
Alejandro Imass articulated:
Hi,
Anybody know the editorial/publisher of the psSense book?
Which one? Perhaps you might want to start here:
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooksfield-keywords=pfsensex=0y=0
BTW, your sig
Hi Alejandro:
I'm not aware of a pfSense book, but if you want a book on PF, there is:
The OpenBSD PF Packet Filter Book
Editor: Jeremy C. Reed
Publisher: Reed Media Services
ISBN: 978-0-9790342-0-6
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost
On 30/08/2011 19:30, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Preferably in a non-interactive and scriptable way. Is it possible with
the base system tools?
0(ich10)# pw usermod testuser1 -w random
Password for 'testuser1' is: km.y0LScI3p1
0(ich10)# pw usermod testuser1 -w random
Password for 'testuser1' is:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:33:22 -0400
Alejandro Imass articulated:
Hi,
Anybody know the editorial/publisher of the psSense book?
Which one? Perhaps you might want to start here:
I think you would have a better response asking that question on the pfsense
mailing list as the author hangs out on it.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Imass
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011
Anyone know if FreeBSD 8.2 supports the AMD 850 and/or 950 southbridge?
I've been looking on the web without much luck (unusual) and the
hardware docs for the release for the ata driver only mentions 5 amd
chipsets. Is there perhaps a different chipset I should be looking for
to determine
23 matches
Mail list logo
