Hello, I wish to torrent (with transmission) over one interface and access my
server from the web over another interface. I have compiled my kernel with 2
routing tables. Is there a way I can configure each table for each interface
automatically?
Thanks
Jordan__
>I'd like to experiment with having FreeBSD try to use less than the
>full 4 GB (e.g., to make it act as if memory ended at, say, 3 GB)
>but I'm not sure how to tell the kernel to do that.
In /boot/loader.conf set "hw.physmem" to whatever size you want it to use.
"man loader" for more info
R's
At 08:26 PM 9/3/2011, Adam Vande More wrote:
Call a shell script which preforms the actions you want.
Needlessly complex, and doesn't handle the case of stderr.
Since the utility has the ability to force mail to be sent, it
should also have an option not to send it, IMHO.
--Brett Glass
__
Have been doing more experimentation regarding this problem. It
doesn't occur with a 1 GB memory module in the machine, nor with a
2 GB module -- only a 4 GB module.
This makes me wonder if there's some sort of memory bank switching
or extended addressing mechanism here (like PAE). Perhaps it'
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 05:33:40PM -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
> Thanks. I knew it was published in Amazon but I want to purchase
> another format other than Kindle because I use B&N's nook.
> I want to locate the publisher to see if they have other formats like
> ePub or PDF.
I think the poi
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Monkeyfoahead wrote:
>I have a question that I thought that you could probably answer. I
> have setup a freebsd seedbox in my apartment. This box has two internet
> connections (multi-homed server.). One is an ethernet connection behind a
> firewall that is
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
>
> One way to avoid problems would be to create a file name from a timestamp
> and a pid.
>
> The key thing, though, is to avoid mailing on machines that don't have
> mail.
>
Call a shell script which preforms the actions you want.
Regular old
I have a question that I thought that you could probably answer. I have
setup a freebsd seedbox in my apartment. This box has two internet connections
(multi-homed server.). One is an ethernet connection behind a firewall that is
connected to a Comcast modem. The other is my apartment's
2011-09-03 18:39, Brett Glass skrev:
I'm setting up a FreeBSD appliance that won't be running a mail daemon.
I'd like the at(8) command to be there for scheduling of commands, but
do not see any way to prevent it from trying to send mail after it
executes a command. (There's not even a command li
> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 15:42:20 -0600
> To: questi...@freebsd.org
> From: Brett Glass
> Subject: Re: "at" command and mail
>
> At 02:35 PM 9/3/2011, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> >Is 'atrun' actually sending the mails or is 'cron' doing it? 'atrun' is
> >invoked by 'cron', from a specification in
At 02:35 PM 9/3/2011, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>Is 'atrun' actually sending the mails or is 'cron' doing it? 'atrun' is
>invoked by 'cron', from a specification in the system crontab file.
/usr/src/libexec/atrun/atrun.c shows an invocation of sendmail(8) directly
from atrun(8).
>Cron emails *whene
I've just seen something very peculiar. I have here a dual Atom
(D525) system which was running with 1 GB of RAM, and this morning
I put a 4 GB module into the system instead. Suddenly, the
systat(8) and top(8) commands were both reporting bursts of
interrupt overhead as high as 25% of total CP
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Sep 3 11:39:54 2011
> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:39:44 -0600
> To: questi...@freebsd.org
> From: Brett Glass
> Cc:
> Subject: "at" command and mail
>
> I'm setting up a FreeBSD appliance that won't be running a mail
> daemon. I'd like the at(8) com
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:09:33PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:43:12 -0400, Allen wrote:
> >
> > If the people who work on Gnome are going to go Linux only, than, f
> > them.
>
> Gnome, and maybe also Xfce (for using the same Gtk infrastructures)
> will _maybe_ turn into a Li
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011, the wise Коньков Евгений wrote:
Please describe your networks fully
also I ask to send output of:
ifconfig
netstat -nr
My computer has IP 192.168.1.11, and sits behind a ADSL router which has
IP 192.168.1.1, the router is the gateway to the internet. IP adresses are
assi
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
> If you redirect the output from the command to /dev/null or other file, you
> shouldn't recieve an email unless you've also specified -m.
>
> True. But that's awkward, and if you have a job that runs more than once,
> it'd be convenient to be a
Здравствуйте, Marco.
Вы писали 2 сентября 2011 г., 13:42:23:
MB> On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, the wise Коньков Евгений wrote:
>>> set iface route 130.115.0.0/16
>> you say that behind tunnele thereis 130.115.0.0/16 subnet, but
>> MB> [B1] 130.115.85.11 -> 130.115.3.35
>> you have address from subnet 13
At 10:55 AM 9/3/2011, Adam Vande More wrote:
If you redirect the output from the command to /dev/null or other
file, you shouldn't recieve an email unless you've also specified -m.
True. But that's awkward, and if you have a job that runs more than
once, it'd be convenient to be able to keep
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Brett Glass wrote:
> I'm setting up a FreeBSD appliance that won't be running a mail daemon. I'd
> like the at(8) command to be there for scheduling of commands, but do not
> see any way to prevent it from trying to send mail after it executes a
> command. (There'
I'm setting up a FreeBSD appliance that won't be running a mail
daemon. I'd like the at(8) command to be there for scheduling of
commands, but do not see any way to prevent it from trying to send
mail after it executes a command. (There's not even a command line
option that says "do not mail,"
On 09/02/11 21:33, Alejandro Imass wrote:
Anybody know the editorial/publisher of the psSense book?
Presuming you mean "pfSense: the Definitive Guide ...", from the front
page of my copy:
Publisher: Reed Media Services
Editor: Jeremy C. Reed
Web site: www.reedmedia.net
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Allen
> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 05:17:51 -0400
> Message-id: <4e61f0bf.9030...@comcast.net>
Allen wrote:
> Maybe I can play Diplomat here, considering that I use both BSD and
..^
> Linux and Windows, and I won't pretend to care ab
On 03/09/2011 10:17, Allen wrote:
> Try that on any version of BSD before PC-BSD came around. I get that a
> lot of BSD people are programmers and like looking at source code, but
> personally, not being a coder, I don't CARE what flags something uses
However, I, as a systems administrator tha
Maybe I can play Diplomat here, considering that I use both BSD and
Linux and Windows, and I won't pretend to care about any of your
feelings and just be Honest:
On 8/20/2011 2:09 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Dave Pooser
> wrote:
>
>> 3) Updates are a mess. It'
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Why
Sorry, it's looks roughly applicable here.
I'm guilty too, but I don't want/use binary upgrades.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/A-quality-operating-system-tp4717703p4765099.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions maili
Hi Rob
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rob wrote:
Anyone know if FreeBSD 8.2 supports the AMD 850 and/or 950 southbridge? I've
been looking on the web without much luck (unusual) and the hardware docs for
the release for the ata driver only mentions 5 amd chipsets. Is there
perhaps a different chipset
26 matches
Mail list logo
