I've installed mpd5 and am using it to access a pptp VPN server at
work. I've got the config working but am trying to use the 'set iface
up-script
On 01/11/2012 02:25 AM, Glen Davenport wrote:
My name is Glen Davenport. I am trying to download freebsd but haven't a
clue as to how the FTP function works.When I go to download I am given a
directory listing. Needless to say, I have never downloaded anything for
UNIX/LIINUX. Can you help?
M
My name is Glen Davenport. I am trying to download freebsd but haven't a
clue as to how the FTP function works.When I go to download I am given a
directory listing. Needless to say, I have never downloaded anything for
UNIX/LIINUX. Can you help?
My e-mail address is gdd80...@gmail.com. Thanks.
>-Original Message-
>From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Mahan
>Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 4:28 PM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Problems building world with 9.0 RC3
>
>All,
>
>I am having an issue
El día Tuesday, January 10, 2012 a las 07:27:45PM +0100, Polytropon escribió:
> And now back to history. :-)
>
> > > > UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370)
> > >
> > > PDP-11 or K1600? Oh, and EC1056 here (OS/ES SVM OP1). :-)
> >
> > both, PDP-11 and the clone;
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:56:21 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Tuesday, January 10, 2012 a las 09:25:54AM +0100, Polytropon escribió:
Answer: Yes, but it's not as easy as it could have been.
Unlike nearly every other X11 program, notably the "old"
and
Hello,
I've just updated my laptop from 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE, everything
worked but the kernel complains about labels see :
g_dev_taste: make_dev_p() failed (gp->name=vol/root, error=17)
g_dev_taste: make_dev_p() failed (gp->name=vol/root, error=17)
g_dev_taste: make_dev_p() failed (gp->
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:56:21 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Tuesday, January 10, 2012 a las 09:25:54AM +0100, Polytropon escribió:
>
> > Answer: Yes, but it's not as easy as it could have been.
> >
> > Unlike nearly every other X11 program, notably the "old"
> > and "outdated" ones, Firefo
On 1/10/12 5:01 PM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Op 10-1-2012 15:30, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
>>
>> On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>>> Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build
On 1/10/12 4:34 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>>
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> Mine is, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to Dick, that people who
>> don't even *use* apache shouldn't get stuck with a *useless apache
>> module* just because they
Op 10-1-2012 15:32, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
A possible alternative that would keep everyone happy would be
*another* package that actually includes the module, like for example
a package called "mod_php5", it would install the stuff from php5 +
the apache module.
That is the way CentOS handl
Op 10-1-2012 15:30, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The PHP maintainer decides the default options,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
[...]
>
> Mine is, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to Dick, that people who
> don't even *use* apache shouldn't get stuck with a *useless apache
> module* just because they installed PHP.
>
>
> A possible alternative that would kee
Alejandro Imass writes:
Hi,
> IMO it's stupid as well and I second Dick's opinion.
You're at least two, great.
> The module doesn't hurt anyone, and reduces confusion. I think that
> PHP is still more heavily deployed on mod_php than on anything else.
> The Apache module should be built by def
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>> Op 10-1-2012 12:36, Eric Masson schreef:
>>
>>> Dick Hoogendijk writes:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
As I write in another reply: that's true and totally stupid imo.
>>>
>>> *You* think it's stupid.
>>
>> Yes, as I wrote: "stupid imo"
>> But th
On 1/10/12 3:09 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>> Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef:
>>>
>>> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter wrote:
>
> I created a
On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
>> On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
>>> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
>> The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the
>> precompiled packa
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 22:52, alexus wrote:
> I created a jail and within a jail I did
>
> pkg_add -r apache22
> pkg_add -r php5
>
> now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php,
> I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22
>
>
`grep php /usr/local/et
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef:
>>
>> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter wrote:
I created a jail and within a jail I did
pkg_add -r apac
Hello,
When upgrading from FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE using freebsd-update,
I'm asked to merge, what seems like, everything in /etc manually.
And all of the merges are trivial version controls lines.
E.g. my /etc/amd.map (which I never modified) begins with:
# $FreeBSD: releng/8.2/etc/a
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:56:39PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> > And that's just the way it is now. Try replicating the wealth of
> > information you get in various config files in FreeBSD in a GUI. Just
> > how hard it is to open a simple text file in an editor and just fracking
> > do what it
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Op 10-1-2012 12:36, Eric Masson schreef:
>
>> Dick Hoogendijk writes:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> As I write in another reply: that's true and totally stupid imo.
>>
>> *You* think it's stupid.
>
> Yes, as I wrote: "stupid imo"
> But thanks again for
Op 10-1-2012 12:36, Eric Masson schreef:
Dick Hoogendijk writes:
Hi,
As I write in another reply: that's true and totally stupid imo.
*You* think it's stupid.
Yes, as I wrote: "stupid imo"
But thanks again for your reply. You may be right but I still feel it's
better to *have* the pache mo
Dick Hoogendijk writes:
Hi,
> As I write in another reply: that's true and totally stupid imo.
*You* think it's stupid.
There's not one true way to serve php pages, more and more platforms use
a lightweight httpd daemon like nginx and php-fpm for example.
If you manage many servers, you can b
On 10-01-2012, Tue [10:16:06], Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 09:23, Dmitry Sarkisov wrote:
> > Would be nice to know if there any plans on switching to pkgng or any other
> > pkg management
> > system in a future.
>
> pkgng is under active development with the stated aim of replacing the
Op 9-1-2012 23:00, alexus schreef:
Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback!
One of the things I'm seeing is that unfortunately packages are
somewhat limited vs ports...
For example:
I'm trying to get Apache httpd + PHP to work, after pkg_add -r php5,
php5 doesn't have libphp5.so that lin
Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter wrote:
I created a jail and within a jail I did
pkg_add -r apache22
pkg_add -r php5
now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinf
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the precompiled
package you got used. While many people want PHP in the form
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, the wise Polytropon wrote:
Does this image boot successfully?
Unfortunately this is also a no go. I think Intel has done something
special to their iso's, considering that I'm missing 7MB of data.
Regards,
Marco
--
Men have as exaggerated an idea of their
rights as wom
On 10/01/2012 09:23, Dmitry Sarkisov wrote:
> Would be nice to know if there any plans on switching to pkgng or any other
> pkg management
> system in a future.
pkgng is under active development with the stated aim of replacing the
current packaging system. If you want to get involved, check ou
On 10-01-2012, Tue [08:51:33], n j wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Devin Teske
> > wrote:
> >> Of course, this is explicit to rather serious production environments.
> >> Desktop and casual usage ... ports may serve you better
[img_top.gif]
[img_skype_logo.gif]
[img_left_border.gif]
[spacer50.gif]
Dear Skype Member:
As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in the
Skype system.We recently contacted you after noticing an issue on your
account
This is the Last reminder to
El día Tuesday, January 10, 2012 a las 09:25:54AM +0100, Polytropon escribió:
> Answer: Yes, but it's not as easy as it could have been.
>
> Unlike nearly every other X11 program, notably the "old"
> and "outdated" ones, Firefox does _not_ seem to support
> the _standard_ -geometry WxH+X+Y parame
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:45:04 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there some way to start firefox3 in a defined geometry, something
> like
>
> $ firefox3 -geometry 1024x768
Answer: Yes, but it's not as easy as it could have been.
Unlike nearly every other X11 program, notably the "old"
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>> Of course, this is explicit to rather serious production environments.
>> Desktop and casual usage ... ports may serve you better if you like to stay
>> up-to-date rather than only upg
35 matches
Mail list logo
