Re: Best mail setup for home server?

2012-05-06 Thread Daniel Staal
--As of May 5, 2012 10:21:10 AM -0500, Joshua Isom is alleged to have said: I currently use my FreeBSD system as my generic unix server and some coding, along with occasional multimedia. I'd installed postfix years ago and kept using it. Right now, I use getmail with cron, dspam, and dovecot t

Re: help debug bwn(4) wireless

2012-05-06 Thread Chris Whitehouse
On 06/05/2012 17:31, Ian Smith wrote: Anton, I'm not sure what the state of the art is for multiple network profiles for such as wireless vs wired, home and work etc, but look around. I recall one called just 'profile' from years ago, and more recently talk of 'failover' setups for wired/wireles

Re: kernel configuration file

2012-05-06 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 6 May 2012 13:23:08 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote: > > From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun May 6 08:36:52 2012 > > Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400 > > From: Carmel > > To: FreeBSD > > Subject: Re: kernel configuration file > > > > On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT)

Re: kernel configuration file

2012-05-06 Thread Robert Bonomi
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun May 6 08:36:52 2012 > Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400 > From: Carmel > To: FreeBSD > Subject: Re: kernel configuration file > > On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT) > Robert Bonomi articulated: > > > >If you use the "traditional" kernel-hui

Re: help debug bwn(4) wireless

2012-05-06 Thread Ian Smith
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 413, Issue 11, Message: 21 On Sat, 5 May 2012 19:26:00 -0400 (EDT) Chris Hill wrote: > On Sat, 5 May 2012, Robert Bonomi wrote: > > > Anton Shterenlikht wrote; > > [snip] > > >> ...I still find the whole networking area perfectly impenetrable. (If > >>

Re: kernel configuration file

2012-05-06 Thread Carmel
On Sun, 06 May 2012 14:58:39 +0100 Matthew Seaman articulated: >cuse4bsd is a third party module. This means that the sources aren't >available as part of the base system, so making work as compiled-in >code in the kernel will require you to create patches for your kernel >source tree. Not impos

Samba acting oddly.

2012-05-06 Thread Graeme Dargie
I have a problem with Samba, well I "think" it is samba as one machine I have access to when I try to perform an action like create a new folder in my home folder windows spouts that I need permission and would I like to try again. I guess some background would be useful at this point, I have 3

Re: kernel configuration file

2012-05-06 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 06/05/2012 14:34, Carmel wrote: >>> Is there a way that I can simply compile it into the kernel? Would a: >>> >>> device cuse4bsd# Required by webcamd >>> >>> entry in the kernel file work? I cannot find any documentation on >>> that. cuse4bsd is a third party module. This means that th

Re: kernel configuration file

2012-05-06 Thread Mario Lobo
On Sunday 06 May 2012 10:34:12 Carmel wrote: > On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT) > > Robert Bonomi articulated: > >Carmel wrote; > > > >> In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do > >> not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry? > >> > >> # Fl

Re: kernel configuration file

2012-05-06 Thread Carmel
On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT) Robert Bonomi articulated: >Carmel wrote; >> >> In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do >> not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry? >> >> # Floppy drives >> device fdc > >Definitely, "yes". >> >>

Re: kernel configuration file

2012-05-06 Thread Robert Bonomi
Carmel wrote; > > In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do > not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry? > > # Floppy drives > device fdc Definitely, "yes". > > Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have a > floppy

kernel configuration file

2012-05-06 Thread Carmel
In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry? # Floppy drives device fdc Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have a floppy drive? Also, according the the "webcamd" documenta

Re: problem with dhclient after update to FreeBSD-8.3

2012-05-06 Thread Carmel
On Sun, 06 May 2012 10:48:31 +0100 Matthew Seaman articulated: >On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote: >> I just updated my system to "FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0" from version >> 8.2. I was getting warning messages regarding "webcamd" at boot-up; >> however, I got them fixed (I think) I loaded: cuse4bsd_lo

Re: problem with dhclient after update to FreeBSD-8.3

2012-05-06 Thread Carmel
On Sun, 6 May 2012 04:25:52 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block articulated: >On Sun, 6 May 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote: > >>> All I guess I really have to get corrected is the "dhclient" thing, >>> assuming it is a real problem and just not some useless noise. >> >> The

Re: Best mail setup for home server?

2012-05-06 Thread Jerry
On Sat, 05 May 2012 10:21:10 -0500 Joshua Isom articulated: >I currently use my FreeBSD system as my generic unix server and some >coding, along with occasional multimedia. I'd installed postfix years >ago and kept using it. Right now, I use getmail with cron, dspam, and >dovecot to handle my

Re: problem with dhclient after update to FreeBSD-8.3

2012-05-06 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 6 May 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote: All I guess I really have to get corrected is the "dhclient" thing, assuming it is a real problem and just not some useless noise. The 'dhclient already running' message is untidy, but harmless. It's the rc system

Re: problem with dhclient after update to FreeBSD-8.3

2012-05-06 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote: > I just updated my system to "FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0" from version 8.2. I > was getting warning messages regarding "webcamd" at boot-up; however, I > got them fixed (I think) I loaded: cuse4bsd_load="YES" in the > loader.conf file and placed: webcamd_enable="YES"

Re: OpenLDAP 2.4.31 on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 broken!

2012-05-06 Thread O. Hartmann
On 05/06/12 01:55, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-05-05 17:54, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> Since Friday, I have on all of our FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 boxes >> massive trouble with net/openldap24-server (SASL enabled, so it is >> openldap-sasl-server). >> >> Last time OpenLDAP worked was Thursday las