Problem with spamlogd

2012-06-17 Thread Doug Hardie
I am using spamd on several systems and started encountering a problem awhile ago with FreeBSD 7.2 servers, but let it go since I am in the process of upgrading the servers. However, I now am encountering the same issue on FreeBSD 9.0 with spamlogd. It never reads pflog0. pflogd reads the

Re: Problem with spamlogd

2012-06-17 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 17/06/2012 11:45, Doug Hardie wrote: I am using spamd on several systems and started encountering a problem awhile ago with FreeBSD 7.2 servers, but let it go since I am in the process of upgrading the servers. However, I now am encountering the same issue on FreeBSD 9.0 with spamlogd.

Re: how to allow by MAC

2012-06-17 Thread Bill Yuan
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:18:18 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Bill == Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com writes: Bill I want to create a white list MAC address, Only the machine which it's MAC Bill in the white list will

Re: Problem with spamlogd

2012-06-17 Thread Doug Hardie
On 17 June 2012, at 06:29, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 17/06/2012 11:45, Doug Hardie wrote: I am using spamd on several systems and started encountering a problem awhile ago with FreeBSD 7.2 servers, but let it go since I am in the process of upgrading the servers. However, I now am

Re: UEFI Secure Boot Specs - And some sanity

2012-06-17 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Any server manufacturer who chooses to only support MS products is going to find they don't get much business from the academic market. such behaviour is even more stupid today as globally PC market is shrinking. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

Re: Why Clang

2012-06-17 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Clang is consistently faster at compiling than GCC and it is very clean and modular -- not bloated. -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 37025016 12 cze 21:46 /usr/bin/clang well.. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: dumping file system subtree (/var)

2012-06-17 Thread Wojciech Puchar
alternatively - use tar. What I was trying to achieve, which I haven't done yet, was a smallish dump of the core system. By that I mean system + ports, without distfiles, etc. Then a separate dump of user data, which is considerably larger. At this point I am thinking I should do this:

Re: Why Clang

2012-06-17 Thread Mark Blackman
On 17 Jun 2012, at 21:13, Wojciech Puchar wrote: Clang is consistently faster at compiling than GCC and it is very clean and modular -- not bloated. -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 37025016 12 cze 21:46 /usr/bin/clang well.. hope you just left the debugging symbols in and statically

Re: Problem with spamlogd

2012-06-17 Thread Doug Hardie
After many hundreds of tests, I have uncovered something that I never found in any of the pf documents or man pages. If an incoming packet is processed by an rdr rule, it will always be logged as rdr with the rdr rule number. The pass action is never logged, even if the rdr rule does not

Re: Why Clang?

2012-06-17 Thread Thomas Mueller
What is the current status of Clang vs. GCC as default compiler for ports and for make buildworld and make buildkernel in HEAD and 9.0-STABLE? Now one concern is wine not working when Clang is used to make buildworld. I see from reading the emailing lists that the intention is to make Clang the

Re: Why Clang?

2012-06-17 Thread Eitan Adler
On 17 June 2012 21:37, Thomas Mueller mueller...@insightbb.com wrote: What is the current status of Clang vs. GCC as default compiler for ports and for make buildworld and make buildkernel in HEAD and 9.0-STABLE? http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang Now one concern is wine not working when