Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Adam Vande More wrote: On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Wojciech Puchar < woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: totally in error. SpinRite will attempt to read a damage sector up to 2000 times and through different algorithms determine what is most man dd Even be

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
read attempts. In worst case, there will be "gaps" in the result. Surely SpinRite is "more clever" than that, i would bet otherwise. simple tools and free tools are always better ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

re: Patch failed to apply cleanly [chromium-20.0.1132.57] FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE

2012-07-15 Thread Wayne Sierke
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 22:33 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > When attempting to upgrade chromium-19.0.1084.56_1 to > chromium-20.0.1132.57 on FreeBSD9.0 (FreeBSD box2 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD > 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC 2012 > r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i

Re: ati, radeon, dri (drm) confusion

2012-07-15 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Have you tried loading the radeon kernel module from /boot/loader.conf? Or even from the console, before starting X? Adam On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 00:08 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > My X behaves really weird lately [1,2], > so I went back to basics. Can somebody > please comment on whether wh

ati, radeon, dri (drm) confusion

2012-07-15 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
My X behaves really weird lately [1,2], so I went back to basics. Can somebody please comment on whether what I'm doing seems correct. Thanks HP Compaq 6715s laptop FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #9 r238259M amd64 vgapci0@pci0:1:5:0: class=0x03 card=0x30c2103c chip=0x791f1002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00

Re: where is LOCALBASE actually defined?

2012-07-15 Thread Eitan Adler
On 15 July 2012 15:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I though LOCALBASE has meaning outside > of the ports system too. Clearly I was wrong. > > So, if I happen not to have the ports tree, > I cannot use LOCALBASE in my makefiles, right? correct. LOCALBASE is a ports tree specific thing. you could

Re: where is LOCALBASE actually defined?

2012-07-15 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 03:06:14PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 15 July 2012 14:47, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > $ cat Makefile > > all: > > echo $(LOCALBASE) > > $ > > $ make > > echo > > easier way to test is "make -V LOCALBASE" > > > What do I need to do to use LOCALBASE > > in my

Re: where is LOCALBASE actually defined?

2012-07-15 Thread Eitan Adler
On 15 July 2012 14:47, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > $ cat Makefile > all: > echo $(LOCALBASE) > $ > $ make > echo easier way to test is "make -V LOCALBASE" > What do I need to do to use LOCALBASE > in my makefiles? You need to include "bsd.port.mk" (found in /usr/ports/Mk) -- Eitan Ad

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 23:29:39 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > totally in error. SpinRite will attempt to read a damage sector up to > > 2000 times and through different algorithms determine what is most > > man dd > > conv=sync,noerror Even though it doesn't use different algorithms, pro

where is LOCALBASE actually defined?

2012-07-15 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
$ cat Makefile all: echo $(LOCALBASE) $ $ make echo $ What do I need to do to use LOCALBASE in my makefiles? Thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 _

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Adam Vande More
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Wojciech Puchar < woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > totally in error. SpinRite will attempt to read a damage sector up to >> 2000 times and through different algorithms determine what is most >> > > man dd > Even better, recoverdisk /dev/da0 /dev/da1 --

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
totally in error. SpinRite will attempt to read a damage sector up to 2000 times and through different algorithms determine what is most man dd conv=sync,noerror ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 21:48:23 +0200 Polytropon articulated: > For example, make an 1:1 copy using dd (or ddrescue or dd_rescue) > of the disk. Work with a copy of that copy. Do not alter the disk. > Then use tools that do the job of recovery (see my list postings > about that topic, they contain a

Re: Is there a way to run FreeBSD ports through port 80?

2012-07-15 Thread mrkvrg
Hello All, I have a similar problem with passive ftp due to a self-imposed restrictive firewall. When "make fetch" is run on a port and ftp data is required, the PF firewall stops the program from completing. I got around this problem by restarting the firewall with a separate set of rules t

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 11:51:57 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > In message > > , Adam Vande More wrote: > > >On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette > >wrote: > >> > >> Is there any such a tool (as fsck for FAT32) available for freeBSD? If so, > >> where would I find it? > >>

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:43:57 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar articulated: > On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Bruce Cran wrote: > > > On 15/07/2012 09:56, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> but, in spite of some fanatics here my get worried, i do recommend > >> use windoze scandisk. > > > > I'd forgotten about scandisk

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <5002b996.2000...@cran.org.uk>, Bruce Cran wrote: >On 15/07/2012 09:56, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> but, in spite of some fanatics here my get worried, i do recommend use >> windoze scandisk. > >I'd forgotten about scandisk - for modern Windows (XP and newer) you'll >want to use chkd

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message , Adam Vande More wrote: >On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette >wrote: >> >> Is there any such a tool (as fsck for FAT32) available for freeBSD? If so, >> where would I find it? >> > >/sbin/fsck_msdosfs Thank you. That sure sounds like it ought to do the trick. _

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Bruce Cran
On 15/07/2012 19:43, Wojciech Puchar wrote: both do the same 'scandisk' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. -- Bruce Cran ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
If you absolutely, positively have to recover the drive, I would recommend SpinRite 6 . Its not free; again i would recommend standard windows scandisk. such tools as "the other" utilities are usually not better. make sure you have full disk backup anyway ___

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Bruce Cran wrote: On 15/07/2012 09:56, Wojciech Puchar wrote: but, in spite of some fanatics here my get worried, i do recommend use windoze scandisk. I'd forgotten about scandisk - for modern Windows (XP and newer) you'll want to use chkdsk ( e.g. 'chkdsk /F C:' ).

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread John Levine
>Is there any such a tool (as fsck for FAT32) available for freeBSD? If so, >where would I find it? There's fsck_msdosfs, part of the base system. Regular fsck should call it automatically if you run it on a FAT filesystem. R's, John ___ freebsd-quest

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Bruce Cran
On 15/07/2012 09:56, Wojciech Puchar wrote: but, in spite of some fanatics here my get worried, i do recommend use windoze scandisk. I'd forgotten about scandisk - for modern Windows (XP and newer) you'll want to use chkdsk ( e.g. 'chkdsk /F C:' ). -- Bruce Cran _

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:56:22 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar articulated: > > Is there any such a tool (as fsck for FAT32) available for > > freeBSD? If so, where would I find it? > > fsck_msdosfs > > but, in spite of some fanatics here my get worried, i do recommend > use Window's Scandisk. If y

Kernel panic while importing a pool

2012-07-15 Thread Jérôme Lebel
Hi, I had several kernel panics, and I finally understood that one of memory was bad. I removed it. But now, each time I try to import my pool, I get a kernel panic I'm using freebsd 9.0-release generic Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1; apic id = 01 fault virtual address

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Is there any such a tool (as fsck for FAT32) available for freeBSD? If so, where would I find it? fsck_msdosfs but, in spite of some fanatics here my get worried, i do recommend use windoze scandisk. When recovering data from FAT32 i've proven myself what is actually a better tool. unles

Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Adam Vande More
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > Is there any such a tool (as fsck for FAT32) available for freeBSD? If so, > where would I find it? > /sbin/fsck_msdosfs -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

fsck on FAT32 filesystem?

2012-07-15 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
I have a sizable (200GB) external USB 2.0 interface hard drive. (Actually, it's a plain old PATA drive in one of those enclosures that allows it to speak USB 2.0.) So anyway, to make this external drive work with things other than just my FreeBSD system, the drive has been formatted so that it