On 19/09/2012 23:59, Polytropon wrote:
> The terminology is simple and as follows:
>
> A disk is a disk, e. g. /dev/ad0.
>
> A slice is a "DOS primary partition" on the disk, e. g. /dev/ad0s1.
>
> A partition is a subdivision of a slice, e. g. /dev/ad0s1a.
>
> Partitions can be used without a s
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:03:11 -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
> I just discovered a knowledge deficiency on my part that
> I can't seem to resolve.
>
> If one writes a loop of the following form:
>
> #!/usr/local/bin/bash
Just a sidenote: If you're not using bash-specific functionalit
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:03:11 -0500 Martin McCormick wrote:
> #!/usr/local/bin/bash
> ls -LF |grep \/ >/tmp/files
> while read dirname; do
> cd $dirname
> #Do whatever commands to be repeated in each directory.
> done < /tmp/files
>
How about:
ls -LF | grep \/ | while read dirname; do
cd $
I just discovered a knowledge deficiency on my part that
I can't seem to resolve.
If one writes a loop of the following form:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
ls -LF |grep \/ >/tmp/files
while read dirname; do
cd $dirname
#Do whatever commands to be repeated in each directory.
done < /tmp/f
- Original Message -
From: dweimer
To: FreeBSD Questions
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 1:53 AM
Subject: Anyone Tried to use iPXE to boot with iSCSI?
I was just trying some proof of concept testing to see if I could get a system
booting with no local disk using iSCSI running
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:18:02 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> I also find portsnap slower than either
> csup or svn.
That surprises me. Once the initial download and extract is done, I find
"portsnap fetch update" to be miles faster than csup. However, each to
his own, I suppose.
_
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:22:20 +0200, Fritiof Hedman wrote:
> On 19 September 2012 23:37, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:28:30 +0200, Fritiof Hedman wrote:
> >> Hi list!
> >>
> >> I must warn you, I'm quite new to FreeBSD (I'm mostly using Linux
> >> otherwise). I have inherited an old
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:26:45 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>
>> For ports, it's probably worth saving the distfile directory along with
>> local diffs. Move it back into place after the svn checkout of the
>> ports tree.
>
> PMFJI. Newbie here:
On 19 September 2012 23:37, Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:28:30 +0200, Fritiof Hedman wrote:
>> Hi list!
>>
>> I must warn you, I'm quite new to FreeBSD (I'm mostly using Linux
>> otherwise). I have inherited an old (yes, very old) BSD 4.7 machine on
>> my work that I need to clone. I
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:26:45 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
For ports, it's probably worth saving the distfile directory along with
local diffs. Move it back into place after the svn checkout of the
ports tree.
PMFJI. Newbie here: What's wrong with using
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:28:30 +0200, Fritiof Hedman wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> I must warn you, I'm quite new to FreeBSD (I'm mostly using Linux
> otherwise). I have inherited an old (yes, very old) BSD 4.7 machine on
> my work that I need to clone. I've setuped an identical copy of the
> slices on the
Hi list!
I must warn you, I'm quite new to FreeBSD (I'm mostly using Linux
otherwise). I have inherited an old (yes, very old) BSD 4.7 machine on
my work that I need to clone. I've setuped an identical copy of the
slices on the target machine, ran dump the source machine and restore
on the target
Walter Hurry writes:
> PMFJI. Newbie here: What's wrong with using SVN for src, and
> portsnap for ports?
_Wrong_? Nothing.
But a lot of people like the idea of using the same tool to
solve nearly identical problems.
Your experience may diverga.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:26:45 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> For ports, it's probably worth saving the distfile directory along with
> local diffs. Move it back into place after the svn checkout of the
> ports tree.
PMFJI. Newbie here: What's wrong with using SVN for src, and portsnap for
ports?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Stas Verberkt wrote:
> Jerry schreef op :
>
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 05:00:08 -0700
>> Michael Sierchio articulated:
>>
>>> We are really behind the curve here. Git assumes (correctly) that
>>> disk space is inexpensive, much cheaper per byte than network
>>> bandwi
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, pete wright wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> csup updates just the files that have changed without all the overhead.
>>> svn
>>> export can get a copy of all the current files,
Folks,
Seems that those (like me) concerned about 9.1 release branch activity
not having been exported to CVS, requiring moving to SVN and abandoning
c*sup source updating 'all of a sudden', can relax migration schedules a
bit, for now .. though it's been a good 'gee-up' for me, at least.
Prob
On Tue 2012-09-18 (23:31), Gareth de Vaux wrote:
> Looking at /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk and /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk -
> bins and libs get installed with schg if PRECIOUSPROG and PRECIOUSLIB are
> set respectively in their makefiles, both of which can be overridden by
> setting NO_FSCHG, pr
2012-09-19 07:23, saeedeh motlagh skrev:
thanks Bernt, i deinstall it and then try startx. startx works and
displays graphical page. but when i restart me system i do not have
desktop yet.
you know, startx displays graphical page when fbdev is installed too.
please let me know if you have any id
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:05:06 -0400
"Thomas Mueller" wrote:
> Script started on Wed Sep 19 04:15:02 2012
> fsck_ffs /dev/ada0p9
just to make sure: the partition was not mounted when you started fsck?
> Now I wonder if the file system is really fixed, with possibly some
> files in /pkgsrc su
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:05:06 -0400
"Thomas Mueller" wrote:
> THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 7584318, 7584319,
> ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
> ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
> ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
> ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
> 1475900 files, 4638292 used, 211624
I have or had a problem with a file system (FreeBSD UFS2) messed up, either by
errant software or system freeze/crash.
I successfully cross-compiled, from FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE, a NetBSD 5.1_STABLE
i386 system to install on 8 GB USB stick.
I have both the NetBSD system source as well as pkgsrc and
thank you a lot Steve;
it's worked very well.
Best regards
2012/9/18 Steve O'Hara-Smith
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:25:03 +
> ahmed elouadrhiri wrote:
>
> > Hi all;
> >
> > i tried to install yuma in freebsd by the command : "make freebsd=1"
> >
> > and it give me :
> > "Makefile", line 14:
mer...@stonehenge.com schreef op :
"Stas" == Stas Verberkt writes:
Stas> On a side note, using Git does mean that everyone has to
download a complete
Stas> repository. This makes using a csup-like architecture quite
Stas> "heavy-weight".
The entire history of the Linux kernel since switching
24 matches
Mail list logo
