> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 05:48:48 +0100
> From: Polytropon
> Subject: Re: well, try here first...
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:20:51 -0700, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
> >
> > To be fair, a lot of the same rules exist for English. The comma
> > is not optional or left to preferences in Englis
Yeap. Same here:
pluto# portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from ec2-eu-west-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have.
No updates needed.
Ports tree is already up to date.
How can it
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:27:37 -0700, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:48 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > That matches what I've learned in school, but it doesn't match
> > realitiy anymore. :-)
> >
> > A famous thing is "comma in lists": Unlike German, where "and"
> > substit
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:48 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> That matches what I've learned in school, but it doesn't match
> realitiy anymore. :-)
>
> A famous thing is "comma in lists": Unlike German, where "and"
> substitutes a comma, in English it seems to be valid to put a
> comma infront of "and":
>
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:20:51 -0700, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> >
> > Ouch.
> >
> > Unlike in English, the comma in German is an important symbol
> > in grammar. It brings structure to sentences. In English, there
> > is the "word order" t
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:09:08 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 02:35:43AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > box. it's got a web interface and runs some flavor of firewall that
> > > I never studied. yuk.
> >
> > I assume your "HW firewall" protects you to the outside. Of
> >
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:01:20AM +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> 2012-11-13 06:22, Gary Kline skrev:
> >
> > guys,
> >
> > hold your flame-throwers, because this is about how to get ssh working
> > from an outside computer into my brand new "tao" that is running a
> > flavor of linu
On Nov 13, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>
> Ouch.
>
> Unlike in English, the comma in German is an important symbol
> in grammar. It brings structure to sentences. In English, there
> is the "word order" that achieves this goal, and a comma is
> mostly optional or "left to preferences". I
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 02:35:43AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > box. it's got a web interface and runs some flavor of firewall that
> > I never studied. yuk.
>
> I assume your "HW firewall" protects you to the outside. Of
> course it should allow SSH connections from the outside to
>
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 03:58:14AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:26:00 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:07:38 -0800
> > Gary Kline wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:47:48AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > >
> > Playboy alles wa
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:26:00 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:07:38 -0800
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:47:48AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:00:07 -0800
> > > Gary Kline wrote:
> > >
> > > > On
2012-11-13 06:22, Gary Kline skrev:
guys,
hold your flame-throwers, because this is about how to get ssh working
from an outside computer into my brand new "tao" that is running a
flavor of linux. I just got my quad i5 box to replace the old, broken
tao.
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
OK. I think that I always was doing that anyway. But I want to be sure
that I understand... If the size of the BSD partition is a multiple of,
say, !MB, then the _alignment_ of that partition will likewise (auto-
magically) be at least 1MB also?
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:50:40 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:08:12AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:57:21 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:39:52AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:22:00 -0800, Gary Kline wrot
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:07:38 -0800
Gary Kline wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:47:48AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:00:07 -0800
> > Gary Kline wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:12:55AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 13 Nov 201
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> >You can then easily use newfs with the -f parameter:
> >
> > newfs -U -f 4096
> >
> >This will make sure the proper fragment size will be applied
> >upon formatting the created partitions.
>
> OK. Thanks. I am guessing that th
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:47:48AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:00:07 -0800
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:12:55AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:10:33 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > > ja vohl
Втр 13 Ноя 2012 04:10:46 от Австин Ким :
> Hi, all,
>
> While attempting to build the KDE 4 port, the build of /usr/ports/astro/gpsd
> (which recursively got pulled in somewhere) failed because make(1) tried to
> build using a version of GCC that I had installed from ports at one time but
> lon
> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette"
> Subject: Re: Advanced Format Drive ?
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:07:50 -0800
>
>
> And while we are on the subject... Has anybody ever down any analysis
> (i.e. benchmarking) to find out if -f 4096 is even the best number for
> a modern high(er) capacity drive? I'
I have a server that I use to host ISO images, and mount them so they
are available via network shares. I ran into a problem today, I
temporarily made an ISO image accessible via a md device and mounted it
under /mnt just to check the data on the ISO image. My ISO mount script
ran its updated
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Jason Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:13 PM, ajtiM wrote:
>
>> On Monday 12 November 2012 17:46:44 Aldis Berjoza wrote:
>> > 13.11.2012, 01:27, "ajtiM" :
>> > > Hi!
>> > >
>> > > Is it something wrong with portsnap server or is something wrong with
>>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:13 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> On Monday 12 November 2012 17:46:44 Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> > 13.11.2012, 01:27, "ajtiM" :
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Is it something wrong with portsnap server or is something wrong with
> my
> > > system. When I run portsnap...:
> > > portsnap fetch upd
In message <50a2002b.9040...@qeng-ho.org>,
Arthur Chance wrote:
>According to the manual as of 9.0-RELEASE the default fragment and block
>sizes for newfs are 4k and 32k, so provided your partitions/slices are
>4k aligned everything Should Just Work. Before 9.0 fragments and blocks
>were 2k
In message <20121113073030.87bc0608.free...@edvax.de>,
Polytropon wrote:
>Note that 4k = 8 x 512 byte, and so 64 sectors would be a
>good alignment "grid", while 63 sectors is not. That implies
>that in case you use fdisk to create a slice holding your
>partitions, try to make it start at secto
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:08:12AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:57:21 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:39:52AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:22:00 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > > Anyway, linux is
> > > > installed; the bo
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:00:07 -0800
Gary Kline wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:12:55AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:10:33 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:57:21 -0800
> > > Gary Kline wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 13,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:12:55AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:10:33 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:57:21 -0800
> > Gary Kline wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:39:52AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:2
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:10:33PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:57:21 -0800
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:39:52AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:22:00 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > > Anyway, linux is
> > > >
> "Friedrich" == Friedrich Locke writes:
Friedrich> The http server is just an excuse, ok? Happy now?
So why lie to us, then? Not very nice to lie to people from whom you
want help and answers and advice... FOR FREE.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 77
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:08:12AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:57:21 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:39:52AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:22:00 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > > Anyway, linux is
> > > > installed; the bo
I am really sorry i offend you! It was not my wish!
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Randal L. Schwartz
wrote:
> > "Friedrich" == Friedrich Locke writes:
>
> Friedrich> The http server is just an excuse, ok? Happy now?
>
> So why lie to us, then? Not very nice to lie to people from whom you
Jesus Christ!
The http server is just an excuse, ok? Happy now?
I just need to know, for a tcp server which of those apporaches could
deliver best results!
That's really the question was all about !
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Randal L. Schwartz
wrote:
> > "Friedrich" == Friedrich Lock
> "Friedrich" == Friedrich Locke writes:
Friedrich> I am aware og ngnix, but i have to write my own http
Friedrich> server. Using someone else solution is not an option.
As this is a very unusual requirement (given that nginx is available
under the most free license available), I think you o
In the last episode (Nov 13), Karl Pielorz said:
> I've noticed on our systems (9.0-Stable, amd64) that starting smartd at
> boot time massively extends the startup time of the box.
>
> I think I've traced this down to smartd, and our use of the '-M test'
> config option (which sends a test messag
I am attempting to migrate a test box to pkgng, and have run into
difficulty:
When I run the pkg2ng script, it fails to register postgreql-jdbc because
one if its files, namely /usr/local/share/doc/postgresql/README-client,
is also installed by postgresql-client-9.2.1.
In this, pkgng is perfec
From lenzi.ser...@gmail.com Tue Nov 13 16:17:49 2012
That is one of the reasons I stop buying HP products
specially laptops.. and sony vaio as well..
the last one I have is a z6000 that is still working very well with
FreeBSD10.
HP notebooks are "c
That is one of the reasons I stop buying HP products
specially laptops.. and sony vaio as well..
the last one I have is a z6000 that is still working very well with
FreeBSD10.
HP notebooks are "closed" works only with windows, are expensive
consumes too much power, the bateries did not last...
On 11/13/12 14:21, Arthur Chance wrote:
Oops, sent this off too quickly.
I wrote that. It's only relevant if you have recent disks with 4k
hardware blocks. If you have, you ought to use 4k/16k filesystems
whatever your OS rev.
That should be 4k/32k. As "man newfs" says:
The optimal block:fra
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In message <20121113065602.ee2310d7.free...@edvax.de>,
Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:47:40 -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Is there _anything_ that I will have to do differently than I did for the
last 20 drives I've used with Fre
On 11/13/12 13:00, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I just read in another post about disklayout
_
According to the manual as of 9.0-RELEASE the default fragment
and block sizes for newfs are 4k and 32k, so provided your
partitions/slices are 4k al
Hello.
2012/11/13 14:55:21 +0100 Leslie Jensen => To FreeBSD
Questions :
LJ> I've just installed 9.1-RC3 on a machine.
LJ> When starting I get the error:
LJ> Starting default moused
LJ> moused: unable to open /dev/psm0: No such file or directory
LJ> I have moused_enable="YES" in rc.conf
LJ> Do I
Leslie Jensen wrote:
I just read in another post about disklayout
_
According to the manual as of 9.0-RELEASE the default fragment
and block sizes for newfs are 4k and 32k, so provided your
partitions/slices are 4k aligned everything S
I've just installed 9.1-RC3 on a machine.
When starting I get the error:
Starting default moused
moused: unable to open /dev/psm0: No such file or directory
I have moused_enable="YES" in rc.conf
Do I need to set some right in devfs for it to go away?
Thanks
/Leslie
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:00:15 +0100
Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> I just read in another post about disklayout
> _
> According to the manual as of 9.0-RELEASE the default fragment
> and block sizes for newfs are 4k and 32k, so provided y
I just read in another post about disklayout
_
According to the manual as of 9.0-RELEASE the default fragment
and block sizes for newfs are 4k and 32k, so provided your
partitions/slices are 4k aligned everything Should Just Work.
Befo
12.11.2012 14:07, Artem Kuchin:
The machines runs 4 jails. Everything is in the jails except NAMED.
Named is run on the root host (if i may say so) itself.
There is a zone file there which i changed last week.
Today in the morning i try to open a site and host name is not found.
It worked on fr
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
> On 13 Nov 2012, at 11:03, Friedrich Locke
> wrote:
>
> > Mark,
> >
> > when i say high performance, i am looking something at least as fast as
> the fastest performing http server on the market for a given set of
> requests on the same po
That's a shame, nginx is definitely a robust and fast server, it's
well maintained, it's patched quickly...
If you need proof of its prowess to convince your upstream managers,
I'd be inclined to provide you with a diagram of our architecture for
this particular project, as well as the graphs (net
On 13 Nov 2012, at 11:03, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Mark,
>
> when i say high performance, i am looking something at least as fast as the
> fastest performing http server on the market for a given set of requests on
> the same pool of static files.
>
> I am aware og ngnix, but i have to write
Mark,
when i say high performance, i am looking something at least as fast as the
fastest performing http server on the market for a given set of requests on
the same pool of static files.
I am aware og ngnix, but i have to write my own http server. Using someone
else solution is not an option.
Define "high performance" , what are your expectations in terms of concurrent
connections, requests/second and all ?
Allow me to shed some measure of light here, we're running 16x web servers with
nginx doing *permanent* (as in, for all requests) URL rewriting and serving 500
req/s each.
The
Hi,
I've noticed on our systems (9.0-Stable, amd64) that starting smartd at
boot time massively extends the startup time of the box.
I think I've traced this down to smartd, and our use of the '-M test'
config option (which sends a test message, apparently forking to 'mail' -
and, as the co
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:23:38 -0200
Friedrich Locke wrote:
> 0) To have a single process "accepting" incoming connection on port
> 80 and send the new socket fd to one of the http server in a
> round-roubin manner, or
if you have N cores, create N - X processes or threads for handling the
re
On 13 Nov 2012, at 10:23, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Hi list members,
>
> i would like to be an http server for static content only. Due to this
[snip]
>
>
> What you have to say
benchmark nginx to see if it does the job already.
- Mark
___
freebs
On 13 Nov 2012, at 10:28, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Thank you Mark for suggestion, but my doubt still remains.
perhaps some benchmarking/testing will help clear up the doubt?
- Mark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
Thank you Mark for suggestion, but my doubt still remains.
Regards.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Mark Blackman wrote:
> On 13 Nov 2012, at 10:23, Friedrich Locke
> wrote:
>
> > Hi list members,
> >
> > i would like to be an http server for static content only. Due to this
>
> [snip]
>
> >
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:10:33 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:57:21 -0800
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:39:52AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:22:00 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > > Anyway, linux is
> > > > inst
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:57:21 -0800
Gary Kline wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:39:52AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:22:00 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > Anyway, linux is
> > > installed; the box is on my internal IP net. I can ssh
> > > *out*. to my server, vut
On 11/13/12 06:30, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:14:11 -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Which "partitions" need to be aligned to the 4KB boundaries?
The FreeBSD ones, the MBR ones, or both?
The partitions, all of them. :-)
For MBR partitions, the "DOS primary partitions", which ar
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:57:21 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:39:52AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:22:00 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > Anyway, linux is
> > > installed; the box is on my internal IP net. I can ssh *out*. to my
> > > server, vut from
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:39:52AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:22:00 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > Anyway, linux is
> > installed; the box is on my internal IP net. I can ssh *out*. to my
> > server, vut from my server or wherever, I cant ssh back in.
> >
> > doi
61 matches
Mail list logo
