On 02/05/13 04:22, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:04:40 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
I've almost always built from source since I switched to FreeBSD (I
sometimes, during the initial installation, used pkgs), it's longer but
more reliable.
There was a message on the stable list
h
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:04:40 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> I've almost always built from source since I switched to FreeBSD (I
> sometimes, during the initial installation, used pkgs), it's longer but
> more reliable.
I'm also doing this since I have sufficient CPU and RAM. :-)
However, fo
On 02/04/13 20:55, Joshua Isom wrote:
On 2/4/2013 8:34 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
I really think a message needs to go out on the announce list (as well
as ports@ and questions@, others as appropriate) about the fact there is
no official pkg repo at the moment. I'm constantly seeing emails a
On 2/4/2013 8:34 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
I really think a message needs to go out on the announce list (as well
as ports@ and questions@, others as appropriate) about the fact there is
no official pkg repo at the moment. I'm constantly seeing emails about
this on this list.
I changed to
On 02/04/13 13:03, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:53:40 +0100
mhca12 wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:48 PM, mhca12 wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote:
I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted
to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice an
Ronald F. Guilmette writes:
> My question is just this: Is it possible that Something Bad might
> happen if, in one terminal session, the root user does
> "portinstall A" and if, which that instance of portinstall is
> still running, he then immediately switches to his other terminal
> sessi
On 02/04/2013 3:25 pm, Michael Powell wrote:
dweimer wrote:
I have ran into a recent issue, after a lot of trouble shooting I
have
narrowed it down to something in my /etc/src.conf
the full file just has:
WITHOUT_BIND="YES"
WITHOUT_NTP="YES"
WITHOUT_FLOPPY="YES"
WITHOUT_FREEBSD_UPDATE="YES"
I am, at long last, moving my main system over onto a new drive where
I have just installed a fresh copy of 9.1-RELEASE, and where I have
built and installed essentially all of the ports I had on my old
(8.3-RELEASE) system... at least the ones that I am actually still
actively using.
A problem a
One question about portupgrade has been nagging me, in the back of my
mind, for some time now.
Assume for the moment that on some given system, the root user has two
terminal sessions open, i.e. either two instances of xterm or else two
console sessions.
Also assume that there exist three ports,
dweimer wrote:
>
> I have ran into a recent issue, after a lot of trouble shooting I have
> narrowed it down to something in my /etc/src.conf
>
> the full file just has:
> WITHOUT_BIND="YES"
> WITHOUT_NTP="YES"
> WITHOUT_FLOPPY="YES"
> WITHOUT_FREEBSD_UPDATE="YES"
> WITHOUT_PROFILE="YES"
>
> Of
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:19 PM, dweimer wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 2:56 pm, mhca12 wrote:
>>
>> Is there some overhead associated with the geli setup as
>> described earlier?
>>
>> $ df -h
>> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
>> /dev/ada0p3.eli127G6.9G119G 5
On 02/04/2013 2:56 pm, mhca12 wrote:
Is there some overhead associated with the geli setup as
described earlier?
$ df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ada0p3.eli127G6.9G119G 5%/
devfs 1.0k1.0k 0B 100%/dev
/dev/gp
On 04/02/2013 19:44, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> real memory = 34359738368 (32768 MB)
> avail memory = 33167446016 (31630 MB)
>
>
>
> where did 1GB of memory go?
Used by the kernel.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpke
Wojciech Puchar wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes:
>
> new dell server:
...
> real memory = 34359738368 (32768 MB)
> avail memory = 33167446016 (31630 MB)
>
> where did 1GB of memory go?
- new BIOS firmware available ?
- BIOS - preallocation - graphics card ?
- $ sysctl -a |grep -i mem
jb
___
On 02/04/13 11:54, Alberto Mijares wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm finally playing with my net4801 and nanobsd. SanDisk CF is recognized.
>
> At my first try I had to disable DMA in ATA because it hanged out. Now
> it hangs when trying to mount root filesystem and mountroot> prompt
> appears. However,
> ada0: Previously was known as ad0
> GEOM: new disk ada0
> GEOM_PART: partition 2 has end offset beyond last LBA: 7999487 > 7813119
> GEOM_PART: partition 3 has start offset beyond last LBA: 7999488 > 7813119
> GEOM_PART: partition 3 has end offset beyond last LBA: 8002511 > 7813119
> GEOM_PART: i
On 4 Feb 2013, at 18:53, mhca12 wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:48 PM, mhca12 wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote:
>>> I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted
>>> to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there
>>> a handy guide how to get
new dell server:
Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #2: Sat
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:53:40 +0100
> mhca12 wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:48 PM, mhca12 wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote:
>> >> I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted
>> >> to install r
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:53:40 +0100
mhca12 wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:48 PM, mhca12 wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote:
> >> I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted
> >> to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there
> >> a handy guid
Hi list,
I'm finally playing with my net4801 and nanobsd. SanDisk CF is recognized.
At my first try I had to disable DMA in ATA because it hanged out. Now
it hangs when trying to mount root filesystem and mountroot> prompt
appears. However, if a stop in loader prompt and type ls, files and
dirs a
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:48 PM, mhca12 wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote:
>> I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted
>> to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there
>> a handy guide how to get started or should I use pkg_add -r?
>>
>> Is th
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote:
> I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted
> to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there
> a handy guide how to get started or should I use pkg_add -r?
>
> Is this any different for i386? It used to be that there's
I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted
to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there
a handy guide how to get started or should I use pkg_add -r?
Is this any different for i386? It used to be that there's
no i386 pkgng repository.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Fabian Keil wrote:
> mhca12 wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Fabian Keil wrote:
>> > mhca12 wrote:
>> >
>> >> I followed the guide on dan.me.uk to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64
>> >> but I get always stuck because the kernel doesn't ask me for the
>> >> pass
mhca12 wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > mhca12 wrote:
> >
> >> I followed the guide on dan.me.uk to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64
> >> but I get always stuck because the kernel doesn't ask me for the
> >> passphrase and doesn't find the /dev/gpt/enc.eli where enc is th
I have ran into a recent issue, after a lot of trouble shooting I have
narrowed it down to something in my /etc/src.conf
the full file just has:
WITHOUT_BIND="YES"
WITHOUT_NTP="YES"
WITHOUT_FLOPPY="YES"
WITHOUT_FREEBSD_UPDATE="YES"
WITHOUT_PROFILE="YES"
Of course bind and ntp are added in by
On Jan 31, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Albert Shih wrote:
> Well I've server running FreeBSD 9.0 with (don't count / on differents
> disks) zfs pool with 36 disk.
>
> The performance is very very good on the server.
>
> I've one NFS client running FreeBSD 8.3 and the performance over NFS is
> very good :
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:10:09 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin articulated:
> Thanks, I will take a look. I got Zoneedit for free though..
As always, you get what you pay for. I have had a few instances when I
had to contact the technical support team at DynDNSs and was quite
impressed. They got back to me
On 2013, Feb 4, at 5:48, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a similar issue about my emails not getting forwarded by Zoneedit.
> Now I am using the Google SMTP server to collect the emails for my domain.
> Maybe I should also switch the DNS to another service. I need my router to
> be able
On 2/4/2013 at 9:48 AM Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
|Hi,
|
|I had a similar issue about my emails not getting forwarded by
Zoneedit.
|Now I am using the Google SMTP server to collect the emails for my
domain.
|Maybe I should also switch the DNS to another service. I need my
router to
|be able to updat
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:48:06 -0500
> Pierre-Luc Drouin articulated:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mike. wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 2/3/2013 at 3:04 PM Fbsd8 wrote:
> > > | [snip]
> > > |
> > > |After reviewing zoneedit new website looks like
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:48:06 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin articulated:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mike. wrote:
>
> >
> > On 2/3/2013 at 3:04 PM Fbsd8 wrote:
> > | [snip]
> > |
> > |After reviewing zoneedit new website looks like they are no longer
> > free
> > |and there now in the domain regis
Hi,
I had a similar issue about my emails not getting forwarded by Zoneedit.
Now I am using the Google SMTP server to collect the emails for my domain.
Maybe I should also switch the DNS to another service. I need my router to
be able to update the DNS information for my dynamic IP address though.
On 2/3/2013 at 3:04 PM Fbsd8 wrote:
| [snip]
|
|After reviewing zoneedit new website looks like they are no longer
free
|and there now in the domain register business
=
Zoneedit was purchased by Dotster a while ago (few months? couple of
years?)
If you look at an legacy zonee
Whoops. Initially sent a message to the poster directly.
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 05:26:52PM -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> What is the category / port name to install svn?
/usr/ports/devel/subversion
I assum you meant that.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org m
I think it's just a spam, and I would not recommend to answer that mails
2013/2/4 Jerry
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:12:15 -0600
> ogidiagba obaroene articulated:
>
> Seriously dude, the crystal ball is hung over from watching the Super
> Bowl yesterday. You are going to have to do it the old fashio
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Fabian Keil wrote:
> mhca12 wrote:
>
>> I followed the guide on dan.me.uk to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64
>> but I get always stuck because the kernel doesn't ask me for the
>> passphrase and doesn't find the /dev/gpt/enc.eli where enc is the
>> label I gave to the roo
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:12:15 -0600
ogidiagba obaroene articulated:
Seriously dude, the crystal ball is hung over from watching the Super
Bowl yesterday. You are going to have to do it the old fashioned way
and actually write your question out in long hand.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followu
mhca12 wrote:
> I followed the guide on dan.me.uk to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64
> but I get always stuck because the kernel doesn't ask me for the
> passphrase and doesn't find the /dev/gpt/enc.eli where enc is the
> label I gave to the root partition. I also tried with /dev/ada0p3.eli
> without s
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 452, Issue 11, Message: 9
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:45:05 -0500 Nick K wrote:
> I am posting here hoping that a "Dan" from ZoneEdit.com still monitors this
> mailing list.
> I am in a very bad situation and my mail forwarding has been down for over
> a week -- no r
41 matches
Mail list logo
