On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
>> custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed.
>> However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPD
On 10/03/2013 20:28, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Have tried that, but it rebuilds pixman, but then X bombs out blurting
> out messages that libpixman.so is missing :(
>
> I have tried to remove print/texlive-scheme-full; removed it, but then
> run portmaster -R pixman, and portmaster -r pixman a
On 03/10/2013 17:20, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> I am after a really specific use-case and the last minute transactions
> are important. Using a zpool over geli over a zvol. I'd like to know if
> during shutdown the kernel flushes all zfs files caches in order so
> these last minutes transactions wo
On 3 October 2013, at 11:58, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
>>> custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed.
>>
On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update
completed. However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been
upd
On 10/02/13 14:49, Gary Kline wrote:
> well, it just happened again. when I closed an unwanted URL, the
> other two instances of firefox vanished. I know the Hard way of
> getting them all back, but does is there an easy way of refilling
> both browsers? oh, and if ther
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a custom
> kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. However, I
> noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The first entry still
> says:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
> Antonio Olivares writes:
>
>> I tried your advice with the -R option, it worked, but for only pixman
>> the other ports that depend on it don't get rebuilt :(
>>
>> I try to use -x 'texlive-*' but it does not work :(
>> I get
>>
>> Could not
vBSDcon is a BSD-related conference occurring *this month* from 25th – 27th,
just 3 weeks away in the DC Metropolitan area. At a cost of only USD$75, the
time to register for this event is now! vBSDcon has an amazing list of
speakers from the FreeBSD and OpenBSD communities, but participation
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a custom
kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. However, I
noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The first entry still
says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct?
_
> From: hrkesh sahu
> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:09:02 +0530
> To: "Julian H. Stacey"
> Cc: Polytropon ,
> FreeBSD questions
Hi, No idea why it was To: me.
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I dislike MS & windows & quoted-prin
Hi John,
John Levine wrote:
> Dunno about Soekris, but I'm very happy with one of these
> mini-box systems that cost about $250 with a 60GB SSD disk:
>
> http://www.mini-box.com/MiniPC-Value-Systems
thank you for your detailed answer and useful suggestion, I will
probably look for a similar produc
Hello.
Does anyone have a clue why kernel always directs ESP packets via
default route (or default gateway in FIB 0), even if there are other
FIBs with per-interface routes?
I'm stuck with the gateway, which is connected to 2 ISPs and the
necessity to configure IPSec tunnels on both external
On 10/02/2013 08:13 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 02/10/2013 16:34, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Is there a way to know if a zfs pool had an unclean shutdown?
An attribute or maybe something during mount time similar to what ufs
does (WARNING: / was not properly dismounted)?
Other than looking at t
03.10.2013 17:36, dweimer wrote:
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
During the buildwo
Hello Bill,
thank you for your answer!
Bill Tillman wrote:
> The way technology has moved on these days I would approach this from a
> completely different manner. Soekris makes some cool little boxes, but the
> last time I looked they still had I486 cpu's...today may be different,
> probably
>
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
--
Thanks,
Dean E. Weimer
http://www.dweimer
Hi All,
I am facing a routing issue for the Interoperability 1.5 topology.
Please find the attachment of the exact topology map.
As per test setup –
Ø Configured REF-Router2 NOT to transmit Router Advertisement on
Network1. But REF-Router2 is able to transmit Router Advertisement on
Networ
Hi all,
Using freebsd 9.2 amd64 and poudriere, perl fails to build:
/bin/mkdir -p
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/.
install -o root -g wheel -m 444
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/BSDPAN-2007/BSDPAN.pm
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/
Hi,
I Am Ryan, ( SEO Marketing Strategist )
You want to get your website in front of as many people as possible. Our SEO
services give you long-lasting results that extend beyond a quick, temporary
boost in rankings. Well help you achieve better rankings, increased
traffic, and more
Hi,
I Am Ryan, ( SEO Marketing Strategist )
You want to get your website in front of as many people as possible. Our SEO
services give you long-lasting results that extend beyond a quick, temporary
boost in rankings. Well help you achieve better rankings, increased
traffic, and more
21 matches
Mail list logo