Re: Is ZFS production ready?

2012-06-21 Thread Евгений Лактанов
21.06.2012 21:32, Wojciech Puchar пишет: >>> Agreed. Wojciech Puchar is in my 'probable troll' file at this point, >> >> Here too, http://berklix.com/~jhs/dots/.procmailrc.lists >> > very good. just block me, instead of performing aggresive replies and > personal attacks. > > > __

Re: Is ZFS production ready?

2012-06-21 Thread Евгений Лактанов
21.06.2012 15:52, Wojciech Puchar пишет: > stick with UFS. It JUST WORKS(R), and is trusty. > And it works fast. > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any ma

Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program

2012-06-20 Thread Евгений Лактанов
21.06.2012 02:26, Wojciech Puchar пишет: >>> the answer. >> >> I'll try to help out, here. >> >> Christer Solskogen: I think the reason that is so very important to >> Wojciech Puchar is the fact that he is incapable of imagining: >> >> 1. other concerns that might apply >> >> 2. that things appear

Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program

2012-06-20 Thread Евгений Лактанов
21.06.2012 01:14, Chad Perrin пишет: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:40:56PM +0400, Евгений Лактанов wrote: >> 20.06.2012 18:47, Mark Felder пишет: >>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:43:14 -0500, Wojciech Puchar >>> wrote: >>>> [attribution lost by Wojciech Puchar a

Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program

2012-06-20 Thread Евгений Лактанов
20.06.2012 18:47, Mark Felder пишет: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:43:14 -0500, Wojciech Puchar > wrote: > >>> Why not make FreeBSD better for everyone by cooperating with the >>> CLANG project? >> >> because we already have great compiler - GCC. In spite of using GPL >> licence. > > GCC performs well,

Re: Why Clang

2012-06-19 Thread Евгений Лактанов
20.06.2012 00:50, Polytropon пишет: > On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:06:49 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: >>> GPL protects the freedom of the programmer who licensed his >>> code under those licenses: He wants it to be free for use, >>> but not to be turned into closed source products. >

Re: Why Clang

2012-06-19 Thread Евгений Лактанов
20.06.2012 00:06, Anonymous Remailer (austria) пишет: >> GPL protects the freedom of the programmer who licensed his >> code under those licenses: He wants it to be free for use, >> but not to be turned into closed source products. > What a lying sonofabitch. That is not called freedom. That is cal

Re: Odd error when doing pkg_version

2011-09-20 Thread Евгений Лактанов
21.09.2011 01:40, Alexander Best пишет: > On Tue Sep 20 11, Ron (Lists) wrote: Starting a couple of days ago, when I run pkg_version I get the following error: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgdbm.so.3" not found, required by "httpd" Everything seems

Re: Firefox clean installation but does not execute

2011-09-20 Thread Евгений Лактанов
21.09.2011 01:00, Chris Whitehouse пишет: > On 20/09/2011 15:04, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:44:31PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:40:42PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:

A FreeBSD HTPC

2011-09-15 Thread Евгений Лактанов
Thinking about doing an HTPC project, however I remember having problems with an avermedia tuner way back (damn I am old). Browsed through the hardware notes to the 8.2 and the situations seems to be pretty desperate, I've checked GNU/Linux and it is years ahead in this department. I also wonde