On 11/30/05, Grant Peel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And, the php (cli version) went fine, but it did come up with a few gui
> questions, but non about --with-gd -enable-mysql etc etc. How to do I deal
> with that? I was thinking, after make, do I go to the work directory and add
> them to the conf
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:39:16 -0800, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You missed a step. Your system clock is off and that makes the
> installworld try to use touch. Set your system clock and you may have
> to remake your world but it should install.
>
> Kent
Infact it was off - can you g
Hello World,
Just got 5.3-RELEASE installed yesterday on this system and was
cvsup'ing to 5-STABLE today. Used the following process, based on
/usr/src/UPDATING (as well as the countless times I've done this
before), and got the error below during 'installworld'. I did this
same update (from 5.
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 03:40:56 +0100, Hexren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could this not be circumvented by using a server in the
> Internet as second Gateway. If I route all traffic (both lines) from my LAN
> Gateway
> through a VPN to a second Gateway NAT it there and only then go to the
> Inter
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:52:12 -0800, Sean Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have more than one mail server. I would like to have all emails be
> able to be sent to @calarts.edu and go to the correct server with that
> email account on it. The current set up is @calarts.edu goes to our
> main
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:32:50 +0100, Hexren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the following problem, I have 2 ADSl Lines and would like to
> combine those 2 into 1 big. I have full control of both the gateway
> from my LAN and another Server in the internet which I coud use as a
> second gateway.
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:21:47 -0500, Andrew Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using ipf as my firewall, and I can't figure out why OWA is being blocked
> going to 172.20.0.11. Below is the current config file which works. But if
> I removed the fourth line, my users can't access OWA externa
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:21:47 -0500, Andrew Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using ipf as my firewall, and I can't figure out why OWA is being blocked
> going to 172.20.0.11. Below is the current config file which works. But if
> I removed the fourth line, my users can't access OWA externa
First hit on google:
http://sixshooter.v6.thrupoint.net/jeroen/faq.html
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:08:59 -0800, Loren M. Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FreeBSD's main file system is currently UFS2, but I've also heard
> reference to UFS and the Berkeley Fast File System(FFS). Looking
> through t
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:56:57 -0800, Tim Traver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ok, this may be a dumb question, but does anyone know where I can find a
> simple script that shows the network traffic to and from your local box ?
> there must be a simpler way...
If you are running 5.3-REL
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:00:35 +0200, Ksenia Marasanova
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need some help with Postfix, but I am asking it here, because I am
> not sure what causes the problem - Postfix or syslog.
Have you tried defining the following (yes, they are the defaults I
know) in
> I believe you'll have one additional problem to resolve. Even if you
> successfully modify the destination IP address and get it pointed to
> the upstream server, the source IP will be unmodified and will still
> be the originator. Since the source IP is unmodified - the upstream
> mail server wi
All,
I'm having a problem getting nat to work on a gif interface. My
goal here is to have a FreeBSD host (which is the gateway for a home
network) connect to a VPN using a "client vpn" setup and masquerade
(nat) the network behind the FreeBSD host using a single IP provided
by the corporate VPN
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:47:43 -0500, Michael Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Any suggestions for something compatible with Cisco's 3080 VPN
> > product? Something that will work from behind my home NAT box,
> > ideally?
>
> There is nothing that I know of, I have a 3000 at work and wanted t
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:14:21 -0600, Adam Seniuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is more for redundancy, I have 2 on board nic's so if I can use both of
> them to do basic dns round robin load balancing and manual failover its more
> useful then one network card doing nothing :D
There is a sysctl
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:00:45 -0600, Adam Seniuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > xl0
> > arp: 192.168.1.100 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:02:b3:9f:74:89 on
> > xl0
> > arp: 192.168.1.1 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:07:e9:10:43:78 on
>
> I get these messages in my logs (quite a few)
>
> So I a
16 matches
Mail list logo
