Re: ati, radeon, dri (drm) confusion

2012-07-15 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Have you tried loading the radeon kernel module from /boot/loader.conf? Or even from the console, before starting X? Adam On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 00:08 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: My X behaves really weird lately [1,2], so I went back to basics. Can somebody please comment on whether what

RE: DRI for Radeon HD5450 on FreeBSD 9.0

2012-02-23 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Dear list, I own a radeon HD5450 and I would like to know how well it is supported by freeBSD 9, in partocular DRI and 3D accelaeration. I have a fresh 9.0/amd64 on my machine and Xorg fails to initialise the DRI. It says (from Xorg-0.log): (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable (II)

Re: X11 - radeon or radeonhd? (ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT)

2009-01-02 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Friday 02 January 2009 13:32:57 Ewald Jenisch wrote: Hi, I've got a PC (Dell) that came with a Radeon HD 2400 XT (RV610 chipset). Afaik there isn't 3D support yet with this card, so my primary goal is to get it working as far as 2D and speed is concerned (I don't want to go for vesa if

Re: X11 - radeon or radeonhd? (ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT)

2009-01-02 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 20:38 +0100, cpghost wrote: On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:42:38PM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: On Friday 02 January 2009 13:32:57 Ewald Jenisch wrote: Hi, I've got a PC (Dell) that came with a Radeon HD 2400 XT (RV610 chipset). Afaik there isn't 3D support

Re: X11 - radeon or radeonhd? (ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT)

2009-01-02 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:23:50 +0100 Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote: On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:42:38PM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: On Friday 02 January 2009 13:32:57 Ewald Jenisch wrote: Hi, I've got a PC (Dell) that came with a Radeon HD 2400 XT (RV610 chipset). Afaik

Re: loader.conf fbsd 7-release

2008-12-16 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 13:19 -0500, Gary Hartl wrote: Hi all; I need to add something to loader.conf which according to me should be in /boot Has something changed so that it wouldn't be there anymore. Or do i just create it and it will parse it out at boot. I need to add

Re: firewire vs IDE DVD.

2003-08-27 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
There is no /dev/acd0c on my system :-) Just a /dev/acd0 and a /dev/acd0t01 (neither of which work). Adam On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Matthew Graybosch wrote: On 15:03 Tue 26 Aug , Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Anyone? The same IDE drive plays back DVDs with mplayer under NetBSD without any

Re: firewire vs IDE DVD.

2003-08-26 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Anyone? The same IDE drive plays back DVDs with mplayer under NetBSD without any problems, however NetBSD seems to be using some IDE-to-SCSI emulation. Is it impossible to get IDE DVD drives to play back DVD videose under FreeBSD? On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Me again

firewire vs IDE DVD.

2003-08-25 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
I'm hoping someone can help me out here. I recently moved a firewire card and DVD drive that had been in my FreeBSD box to another computer. I replaced it with an IDE DVD drive. The probelm is that now I can't get mplayer or vlc to play any DVDs that had previously worked with the firewire

Re: About Sony i.Link

2003-08-25 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
FreeBSD -CURRENT recognized the firewire DVD-ROM drive I had attached to it. If the install floppies support IEEE1394 (and I don't know if they do), the DVD-ROM drive will just show up as /dev/cd* (depending on the number of SCSI or firewire drives on the machine) Have you tried booting off the

Re: firewire vs IDE DVD.

2003-08-25 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
: user 'adamk' is part of the 'operator' group. In addition, I've tried this as root just in case there's some strange permission thing going on. Still no luck. *Any* ideas? Adam On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: I'm hoping someone can help me out here. I recently moved a firewire

linux compatability

2002-12-28 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Hey folks, I'm noticing some odd behaviour with the linux compatability recently. I have this small gnome app called gnome-run. It links against a number of gnome libraries that I've copied from my linux partition over to /compat/linux and put in the appropriate directories.

Re: linux compatability

2002-12-28 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Mikko Työläjärvi wrote: On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Hey folks, I'm noticing some odd behaviour with the linux compatability recently. I have this small gnome app called gnome-run. It links against a number of gnome libraries

Re: VIA USB support problem...

2002-12-27 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
kernel configuration... Any more diffrances i don't see... See my kernel, if it will help you ... On Friday 27 December 2002 05:01, you wrote: On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Sergey V. Golitzyn wrote: On Friday 27 December 2002 02:44, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: I'm having a difficult time

VIA USB support problem...

2002-12-26 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
I'm having a difficult time getting any USB devices to work under -CURRENT with a VIA UHCI controller. uhci0: VIA 83C572 USB controller port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 5 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: VIA 83C572 USB controller on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev

Re: VIA USB support problem...

2002-12-26 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Sergey V. Golitzyn wrote: On Friday 27 December 2002 02:44, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: I'm having a difficult time getting any USB devices to work under -CURRENT with a VIA UHCI controller. uhci0: VIA 83C572 USB controller port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 5 at device 7.2