Since upgrading to 5.2.1-p4-RELEASE last night, I have seen the
following warnings a few times in my /var/log/messages:
Mar 31 16:49:14 jake kernel: Warning: pid 37735 used static ldt
allocation. Mar 31 16:49:14 jake kernel: See the i386_set_ldt man page
for more info
Trouble is, by the time I go
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:02:17 -0500
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems squid can no longer bind to ports <1024 (as of 2.5.4_6). I've
> been binding to port 85 for ~2 years, and all of a sudden today my
> squid
> started crashing immediately after upgradin
It seems squid can no longer bind to ports <1024 (as of 2.5.4_6). I've
been binding to port 85 for ~2 years, and all of a sudden today my squid
started crashing immediately after upgrading.
I was getting this in my cache.log:
2004/01/16 23:52:43| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 10 to 127.0.0.1:85:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:12:13 -0700
RYAN vAN GINNEKEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> getting this error for my portsdb -uU i just snipped part of it
> because
> it is huge almost all the ports i would say.
> Did a cvsup for all the ports and realized i did not have the space to
>
> spare for them s
Early today my machine froze up (I think it overheated), and ever since I get
this error when booting up my machine:
...
Enabling ipfilter.
IP Filter: already initialized
IP Filter: already initialized
IP Filter: already initialized
IP Filter: already initialized
ioctl(SIOCIPFL6): Invalid argument
On 18 Oct 2003 13:35:30 -0400
Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'pkg_version -v' and 'make search' are very useful, and depend on an
> up-to-date INDEX file.
'pkg_version -v' does NOT depend on an up-to-date INDEX.
> This is completely incorrect. Building INDEX.db is for portversion
Kris, maybe you can answer this definitively, once and for all. What are the
precise reasons why INDEX is needed? Also, what is the practical difference
between using 'make index' and 'portsdb -uU'?
I've been told by a few people that INDEX is unnecessary unless you're building
a package, which mo
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:30:24 +1000
nevle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for your reply,dmesg.boot,ppp.conf and ppp.log files are below.The man
> ppp seems to be saying that I connect with ppp -ddial myisp, is this
> correct?My modem is Simplecomputing netexpress 56K external modem.Hope
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:05:09 -0400 (EDT)
"Michael Sharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My yahoo username under GAIM isnt recognized.
That was a bug in 0.69. It was supposed to be fixed on 0.70 (works
here). If there are still problems with it, I suggest you take it up
with their developers.
Stop
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:51:55 -0400
"James A. Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Yahoo part of Gaim broke last week and is still not working.
Not true. It works (for now).
http://gaim.sourceforge.net/
"Our friends over at Cerulean Studios managed to break my speed record
at cracking Yahoo a
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:06:40 -0400 (EDT)
"Michael Sharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> who would like to go in with me on a full yahoo ban of their services.
> I
> am so damn tired of this freebsd camp writing services so that only M$
> users can enjoy them. The fucking chat.yahoo.com JAVA is writt
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:00:54 -0400 (EDT)
Dariush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its been over a few weeks now after installing freebsd
> 5.0 and still can not run cvsupdate and portupgrade on
> one my servers.
>
> We are behind a firewall and proxy server.
Try using '-P -' for passive mode. That s
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:57:04 -0500 (CDT)
"F. Even" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to upgrade a 4.0 machine to STABLE, or at least to the
> RELENG security level. How difficult will this be? Is there anything
>
> special that I need to be concerned about, so I don't get bit? This
>
ay to share files from FreeBSD to Windows on a dual-boot
> OS is to use a FAT partition which can be mounted on both OSes.
What about installing vmware (on XP), then install FreeBSD in vmware,
and mounting it that way? Maybe a lot of trouble, but at least he'd be
able to get at the da
tampered/modified tarball).
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
;m having the same problem. I think it has something to do with pcre,
but I'm not sure yet. I'll report back if I find something more.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
k |strings -a |head -n 3 |tail -n 1
I don't think it's safe to assume that it's always on the 3rd line, but
that seems to be the case quite often.
Thanks,
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
upports replication (it didn't at the time of
this post).
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 14:03, Alex Zivenko wrote:
> How to setup yhis printer on FreeBSD?
> Canon S200x, new model...
Did you check linuxprinting.org ?
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 07:15, ëéòäùë ÃÃÃÃÃ
Ã
ÃÃÃ wrote:
> How to boot FreeBSD by Windows XP loader?
I'd recommend checking out GAG. It's an excellent and easy boot manager.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
.ru/soft/chuchelo/
ftp/downloader
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
heck?
This is incorrect. My SB Live has worked just fine on 4.6.2, 4.7, 4.8,
and 5.1. I didn't do anything outside of what the handbook instructed me
to do.
I'd be suspicious of artsd causing you problems. I've heard of this
before, but I don't know the solution. Check the mailing
nfigure it. That'll
make life quite a bit easier.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ufficient to cite the location. Many thanks for your
> response.
This topic has been discussed at great length before. Check the mailing
list archives.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 00:06, KroNiC~BSD wrote:
> Is it possible to have more that one X session running on the same
> machine?
Yes, it is possible. From the console, type:
display=:1 startx
This will open up an X session on F10 (you can switch back to the old
one with CTRL+ALT+F9).
--
o do with
> sendmail security.
> I'm sure it's in the UPDATING file, I'm too lazy to check right now.
Maybe this is the cause for you. I'm pretty convinced its something in
the way I set things up, but I've never had anyone tell me that my setup
is wrong, so who know
available).
It's quite simple to set up, and there are dozens of pages out there to
pretty much hold your hand on every step. You'll just need to make the
effort to search and read!
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
e the solution that I found (chmod a-x
/usr/sbin/mailwrapper). This is a dirty hack, but it did the trick. I
don't use sendmail at all.
Let me know if you find a proper solution for this.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
tried using chflags to prevent the
permissions from being changed? This should do the trick, albeit a dirty
hack.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 10:04, Adam Bender wrote:
> XFree86-4.2.0_1,1
There's your problem. Portupgrade to 4.3.x and try Xft and xscreensaver
again.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
on,
but Google isn't serving me well on this issue.
Anyone care to enlighten me?
If it matters, I'm running 5.1-R-p2 with ipf+ipnat.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
P.S. If this is more appropriate for the Net mailing list, just let me
know and I'll take it there instea
faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation)
Which one of these is it suggesting I remove?
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:55, Adam Bender wrote:
> OK, sorry to deluge the list with questions, but now I've having serious
> problems compiling ports.
What version of XFree86 are you running?
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
asking why still a lot of people here who hadn't move to FreeBSD?
>
> Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
> FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
Let's all refrain from feeding this troll.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gs like this happen, and removing /usr/ports and starting over is
the simplest way to fix things. I've had to do it a couple times since I
started using FreeBSD 1.5 years ago.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
from /usr/ports instead of using
'portsdb -U'. Much more reliable!
However, it seems that INDEX builds are failing right now anyway. Kris
has been sending out emails to Ports all day with failure reports.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the Debug
Window (under the Help menu)?
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
eed to cvsup your source and follow the steps for
recompiling your world and kernel.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 22:41, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so your mail can be easily read.
Sorry, my client (Evo 1.4.4) is set to wrap, but for some reason it
occasionally decides not to. It's probably some weird GTK bug.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAI
7;t always do so immediately after a port is updated.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
your ports regularly (net/cvsup-without-gui). There
are many threads on the mailing lists with detailed information on how
to cvsup your ports tree and rebuild your INDEX.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
4.0, I'd first update to 4.3, then to 4.6.2, then to 4.8. Be sure
to read /usr/src/UPDATING *very* carefully each time. This is a huge
upgrade, and will take some work to get it done properly.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
cal/sbin/portsdb -u
/usr/local/sbin/portsclean -C
/usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -u
/usr/local/sbin/portversion -v |/usr/bin/fgrep "needs" >$OUTDATED_LOG
Note that you'll need net/cvsup-without-gui and sysutils/portupgrade to
run my script.
Read the Handbook for more information about up
on working after an
outage. I think my next modem will be an Alcatel ..
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ag=.",
> but I'm following the handbook and the sample file by leaving "tag=.".
> I also tried changing "." to the correct cvs tag (RELENG_5_0) and got
> the same results.
> What am I doing wrong?
> Thanks,
> ~John
I think you meant cvsup3, no
in the order you prefer.
Of course, this will only be effective if indeed it is the order of
execution that is causing your problems.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
46 matches
Mail list logo