I recently installed FreeBSD 5 on a server for one of my clients.
For some reason, the following messages CONSTANTLY appear in the
"messages" log file (and on the console)
kernel: usb0: 1 scheduling overruns
kernel: usb1: 1 scheduling overruns
These appear at random intervals between 20 sec
Since we're on the subject of archaic software, does anyone know of a
good PDP-11 emulator that will run on FreeBSD? I'd like one that can
run the RSTS/E operating system. This is strictly for nostalgic
purposes :-) I learned how to program on a PDP-11 with RSTS/E back in
1983. I still have cop
Hello all.
Is there a full explanation somewhere of what EXACTLY those six memory
usage figures mean that are displayed in 'top'? You know the ones:
Active, Inact, Wired, Cache, Buf, Free. The man page for top doesn't
explain them at all. What exactly is the difference between "active"
and "wi
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 10:34 AM, Thomas von Hassel wrote:
i know someone asked this question before:
But no one answered the man ...can anyone tell us if it can or cannot
be done ?
Personally, I doubt it. The Cobalt is not a generic machine, and it
runs a highly modified version of
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 02:48 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Most ports will print out a summary of the compile time options you
can set when you attempt to build the port.
Thanks for the reply Matt.
The trouble with that is that you have to build it first. It would be
nice to be able to f
Hello all.
I just installed a news FreeBSD 5.0 server for a company here in
Louisville. I keep getting the following errors, like every few
minutes, in the log:
kernel: usb0: 1 scheduling overruns
kernel: usb1: 1 scheduling overruns
I'v turned off usbd in rc.conf, but it's still giving m
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 10:20 AM, Daniel Bye wrote:
You shouldn't need to - the version form the ports gets installed in
/usr/local/. All you need to do is define named_program in
/etc/rc.conf,
and the system will do the right thing. The amount of disk space you
would save by removing
Hello all. I have a few questions about BIND on FreeBSD.
1) Since BIND 8 comes in the base installation of FreeBSD (4.8 and 5),
why is there a BIND 8 port in the ports collection?
2) Why doesn't FreeBSD 5 come with BIND 9 in the base installation
instead of BIND 8? Is there some problem with BI
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 12:26 PM, G D McKee wrote:
You need to remove the port and re make it with ' make deinstall
clean install WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=yes '.
That did it for me. Thanks a lot, everyone, for all your explanations.
Let me ask you this :-). When you go to install a partic
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 03:19 PM, Andrew Knapp wrote:
It now allows only encrypted connections by default. So, you must log
in via IMAP over SSL.
For my mailserver here, I use both WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT, but we
strongly suggest people to use IMAP over SSL.
Thanks.
When I do a portscan
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 12:26 PM, G D McKee wrote:
By deafult the port now complies with secure imap and no plain text
passwords. You need to remove the port and re make it with ' make
deinstall
clean install WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=yes '.
Cool.
What if I want to just leave it as not al
Hello all. I just set up a FreeBSD 5.0 server for a company here in
town. Previously they were using a Linux server for their email. I
installed IMAP-UW 2002 from the ports collection, and it's giving the
following error when users attempt to get their mail:
imapd[8769]: Login disabled user=dud
12 matches
Mail list logo
