On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:13:50AM +0100, Guillaume R. wrote:
> 2005/12/5, David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 06:50:55PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > >
> > > I recently bought a new Intel Xeon server, and when I put it tog
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:32:04PM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote:
> MSG In-short: what is, or where do I find info on, the current status of
> linux binary compatability on FreeBSD/amd64 platform
32-bit x86 Linux binaries should run just fine on FreeBSD/AMD64 5.4 or
later. You will have to install
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 04:25:55PM -0500, Michael W. Oliver wrote:
> CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+ (801.83-MHz K8-class CPU)
..
> OK, here is my question: Why is the CPU speed reported as 801.83MHz?
> Is there something really wrong with my setup here? I have this machine
> configured to
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:01:21AM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > Here's what we're proposing for the new hardware:
> >
> > AMD Athlon64 - 3200+ (Socket 754 - I know, but it's cheap)
> > MSI K8T-FSR (VIA Chipset)
> > 2048MB DDR400 Non-ECC RAM
>
> In my experience trying to put more than 1GB RA
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:07:44PM +0200, Eirik ?verby wrote:
> >Hey all, looking to upgrade a server used in a small business here,
> >looking for opinions and advice about migrating to an AMD64 system,
> >vs. using i386 box, also if it would not be just as feasible to use
> >i386 distribution on
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:17:35AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> Quoting Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >Me either. -current actually supports running i386 binaries in amd64 mode.
> >Thats one of the processor's features. :-)
>
> >You can't run amd64 binaries when booted into an i386 OS, of cou
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 02:37:54PM -0700, Remi wrote:
> Im in the market for a new laptop. Right now I'm looking at HyperSonic
> laptops.
>
> I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one would
> you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be easier to
> r
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 07:23:44AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:44:25AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> > In the mean time, you need a work-around. I'm not sure if you can run
> > FreeBSD 5.x in 32bit mode on an AMD64 box, but that might be a thing
> > to try.
>
> Yo
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 10:45:51AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Not to mention it's impossible to find clock frequencies on amd.com.
Agreed, the easiest public way I've found is:
goto http://ask.amd.com/
select Desktop, Server, Workstation Processor Products
search "CPU specs"
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:06:06PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> AMD, Cyrix. The amd64 arch is for the new 64 bit Opterons (i.e. FX64).
What is "FX64"???
"Opteron" is the server 64-bit CPU
"Athlon64 FX51" is the high-end desktop CPU
"Athlon64" is the desktop CPU
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 01:26:10PM -0800, Steve Wingate wrote:
> STABLE taking the entire first disk (works fine)
> CURRENT taking the first 1/3 of the second disk and
> backup data taking the remaining 2/3 of the second disk.
>
> I have installed CURRENT (at least 8 times) but I cannot get it to
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:14:30PM +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> Nothing against 'booteasy', it does the job - but it looks ugly :-)
If that is the only reason to use grub, try osbsbeta.exe that is in the
tools directory of your CDROM or ftp.freebsd.org.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM
12 matches
Mail list logo
