Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion

2005-01-24 Thread Edward B. Dreger
PH> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:08:52 +0200 PH> From: Petri Helenius PH> To: Nick Pavlica PH> Are you sure you aren't comparing filesystems with different mount PH> options? Async comes to mind first. He _did_ say "as many default options as possible"... does Linux still mount async by default?

Re: Compiling FreeBSD 4.10 kernel with gcc native and gcc-3.4.3

2005-01-01 Thread Edward B. Dreger
KK> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 13:29:38 -0800 KK> From: Kris Kennaway KK> Actually, all the responses I've seen so far have been incorrect, or KK> haven't mentioned the real reason. FreeBSD 4.10 is using gcc 2.95 KK> because later versions of g++ produce incompatible object code, so we Ah. Of this I

Re: Compiling FreeBSD 4.10 kernel with gcc native and gcc-3.4.3

2005-01-01 Thread Edward B. Dreger
> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 13:22:03 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [ removed -performance from CC list ] > linking kernel > ncr53c500.o: In function `ncv_world_start': > ncr53c500.o(.text+0x415): undefined reference