I have the latest 9.1-RELEASE memstick image burned to a USB drive.
I boot from that and connect to my device with a serial console. At some
point, the installer asks me what terminal emulation I am using - I choose
vt100.
But then things go to hell ...
I am not complaining that the screen
We created a few 8.3-RELEASE systems with boot mirrors using onboard Intel
ICH10R. The system picks up the mirror with ataraid and I see it in dmesg
like this:
ar0: 114312MB DDF RAID1 status: READY
But it seems that graid is a much better option, and ataraid has problems (I am
seeing chatter
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686
CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I
tried both:
cpu I586_CPU
and:
cpu I686_CPU
(I also tried them both lowercase, like i686_cpu)
But all of these fail:
GENERIC:
The big report that google published made it clear that even a single scan
error in the SMART data of a disk drive is a good predictor of eventual
failure...
However, when I run smartctl:
# smartctl -a /dev/da0 | grep -i pre-fail
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 016Pre-fail
I have a fairly simple ipfw ruleset, which looks like:
100 allow tcp from any to any established
110 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 0,3,8,11
120 deny icmp from any to any
130 allow ip from any to any via lo0
200 allow udp from me to any 53
210 allow udp from any 53 to me
220 allow udp
I'm going to run FreeBSD off of a flash drive on some older mac mini systems.
Before I begin, though, I'd like some advice on the best USB thumb drives for
this.
These systems will be deployed and left in place, hopefully for YEARS in a
remote, inaccessible location. So, I'd like to make sure
Old 6.4-RELEASE system.
Two filesystems exist, each of which is on its own raid controller.
(Background fsck is not workable for various reasons that are tl;dr.)
So, theoretically, doing both fscks at the same time is workable, since each of
them are on their own controller, and no
FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE system with two physical CPUs, each of which are HT
capable. From dmesg:
cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0
cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1
cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6
cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7
I also see this:
machdep.hyperthreading_allowed: 0
The problem is, I have reason to believe that my workload
