On 06/27/04 03:06, Remi wrote:
See that's I'm thinking, the raw performance is very attractive to me!! So
what's this about a p4 1.7 outperforming a 2.8? You got link to benchmarks?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 8:23 PM
To:
On 05/31/04 21:40, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 05:29:38PM -0500, Jon Noack wrote:
What I envision: Packages are already being built (for example,
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-packages-5-latest/).
The ports system would default to using the package if available
ecause of how long it takes to upgrade ports. This would speed things
up for them while preserving the flexibility of compiling from source
for those who want to do so.
This is a simple enough idea; surely others have considered it as well.
Any thoughts?
Jon Noack
P.S. The opinion on the DragonFly
On 4/20/2004 2:46 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:15:19PM -0500, Jon Noack wrote:
I love the 'make config' option. Is there a way to recursively
'make config' before installing a port with a lot of dependencies
(similar to the way sysutils/portupgrade c
irst install (because the options
are saved), but it's rather annoying to start a kde compile before you
go to bed and wake up with only a few ports installed...
Thanks,
Jon Noack
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
elp posting it in my desire to
bring others into the fold.
Matt, let me know if this was unwanted/damaging -- I can help pay for
bandwidth as penance if needed...
Jon Noack
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
ge?rev=1.6&content-type=text/plain
I would really recommend using the port. It's built from source and has
been tested and configured to run on FreeBSD. People who ran into the
same problems you're facing came up with fairly elegant solutions which
are readily avai
This was resolved with the update to 3.7.1p2.
Jon Noack
Jon Noack wrote:
> On 4.8-RELEASE-p10 machines I can't connect after updating to
> openssh-portable 3.6.1p2-5. Updating steps:
>
> 1) cvsup
> 2) portupgrade -ar
> 3) /usr/local/bin/rc.d/sshd.sh stop
> 4) /usr/lo
for a lot of people.
Any enlightenment would be appreciated.
Jon Noack
Jon Noack wrote:
> On 4.8-RELEASE-p10 machines I can't connect after updating to
> openssh-portable 3.6.1p2-5. Updating steps:
>
> 1) cvsup
> 2) portupgrade -ar
> 3) /usr/local/bin/rc.d/sshd.sh stop
> 4) /us
n `int getopt(int, char*
const*,
const char*)' here
*** Error code 1
*********
Any ideas would be appreciated,
Jon Noack
---> Upgrading 'nmap-3.30' to 'nmap-3.46' (security/nmap)
---> Building '/usr/ports/secur
n no
PAMAuthenticationViaKbdInt no
UsePrivilegeSeparation yes
Subsystem sftp/usr/local/libexec/sftp-server
end sshd_config **
Thanks for any help and/or suggestions,
Jon Noack
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailin
> (find / | grep libqt resulted in libqt-mt.so, but no libqt.so)
I remember seeing something about this in the archives over at
http://freebsd.kde.org. We compile the multi-threaded version of the
library; thus the -mt. Not sure on the best way to fix it, but you try
symlinking libqt.so to li
> I believe it has been answered (no line-wrapping intended):
>
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1782165+0+archive/2003/freebsd-current/20030601.freebsd-current>
Sorry about that -- I did search the archives but those didn't come up.
Thanks for the answers!
Jon
_
;make all install" in this new location sufficient to update
/stand? I did that but it only installed the man page and copied
sysinstall to /usr/sbin. How does one update /stand in 5.x?
Thanks,
Jon Noack
This message was posted to both the doc@ and questi
14 matches
Mail list logo
