- Original Message -
From: "Lowell Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Lee(HINET)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: question for portupgrade
> "Michael Lee(HINET)"
Hi all,
I only have a NIC on my FreeBSD Box.
Here is my configuration:
ifconfig de0 aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd netmask 255.255.255.0 ( My External Interface )
ifconfig de0_alias0 192.168.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 ( My Virtual
Internal Interface )
and this is the result shown for ifconfig -L
de0: flags=8
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: Question for ipf setting on single NIC box
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 03:38:11PM +0800, Michael Lee(HINET) wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I
Have you read the Handbook ?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-wireless.html
- Original Message -
From: "Vinicius Brasil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 9:30 AM
Subject: help on 802.11
> Need to know what mai
Hi,
After cvsupping the port tree ( originally installed by FreeBSD 5.1 Release
CD ),
I tried to do a portupgrade -acCv last night.
Everything seems to be upgraded fine except for Apache.
The originally installed apache is apache-1.3.27_4. The portupgrade attempts
to upgrade it from
apache-1.3.27
Hi,
Is there anyway to avoid updating XFree86 related stuff while performing
portupgrade ?
XFree86 related stuffs are just too big and take too long for my poor PC to
compile them all.
I wonder if I should :
(1) disable fetching the XFree86 related stuffs in the port tree ( to set
something in pk
> On Monday 20 October 2003 01:18 am, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:49:33PM +0800, Michael Lee(HINET) wrote:
> > > Is there anyway to avoid updating XFree86 related stuff while
performing
> > > portupgrade ?
> > > XFree86 related stuffs ar
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:04:20 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 05:31:49PM +0800, Michael Lee(HINET) wrote:
>
> > Now I know the way to manipulate the actions of portupgrade for not
> > upgrading everything.
> > I just posted earlier another question f