http://www.omegamusic.se/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> If these rootless people get control of what goes through the root servers
Thanks, I spewed coffee out of my nose when I read this.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ques
888 .d8b. 888
888 d88P" "Y88b888
888 888 88
888 888 88
888 888 88
888 888 88
888 Y88b. .d88P888
"Y8P"
> Who in their right mind would EVER want to run this crap?
You answered your own question. My guess? People who are too cheap to buy
Windows and too stupid to figure out how to find a free copy of XP or Win 7
on the net and do the activation or find a password. That's a pretty small
user space.
Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Dave U. Random
> wrote:
> > Polytropon wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >> > Having to pay Verisign instead of Microsoft makes no difference: the
> >> > point is why should I have to pay anything
> > But my point is that MS doesn't issue the updates, they have to ask the
> > BIOS vendors to do so, and then the MB vendors have to take the update,
> > and then the users have to install the update. The incentive at each
> > level is generally very small. It does create some confusion, but is
>
> Totally off-topic, but I actually used mine to run gameboy and gameboy
> advance emulators ^^'
And I use mine to write PPC code. But Sony's business model wasn't about
software development or doing what you and I are doing.
> > Windows activation can check the firmware level and Intel's manage
This is really missing the point. The issue is not open source
vs. proprietary although many people seem to try to steer everything into
that meaningless conflict.
The point is the WinTel Mafia's many years of collusion and screwing over
the customer. Try to buy a commodity PC in any major store a
Hi is there any update on this? I would like to be able to run FreeBSD MIPS
and I don't have a MIPS box!
You wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > The short answer is yes - I've seen this. I've not done it myself
> > though, I've just acquired cheap mips hardware.
>
> If you read Fedora's page they were planning to tighten their boot
> sequence to then only boot their approved binary kernels.
Save your old copies of lilo and grub. You're gonna need them if you want to
stay on Intel Mafioso hardware.
> Risk of key revocation later
> If hardware manufac
> clang already compiles the system perfectly well. I'm using it by
> default for that on my personal machines without problems. Any
> remaining clang-bugs in the system would be few and far between and
> generally in areas which are quite hard to trigger.
>
> clang with ports is less well cover
> Only facts? Well and good. Do you have any proof GNU is in any way
> connected to any communist movement?
Yes, see the Gnu Manifesto. Hint: it's named that way for a reason.
> Do you have any facts (NOT living in your head) GPLvX is in any way
> inspired/based on/even remotely connected to/ AN
12 matches
Mail list logo
